A few days ago, the WHO released a report on the investigation of the traceability of the Chinese Communist virus pneumonia virus, almost ruling out the possibility that the virus originated from the Wuhan laboratory. Chinese virologist Yan Limeng subsequently published a report debunking the WHO report as misleading internationally.
A team of international WHO experts visited China in February to investigate the origins of the Wuhan pneumonia outbreak, and on March 30, WHO released its report on the investigation into the traceability of the virus. The 123-page report claimed that the source of the outbreak had not been found, but that it was highly unlikely to have spread to humans through the laboratory, and that it could have been transmitted to humans through intermediate hosts, that is, from bats through other animals, and “possibly” through frozen food.
On March 30, the United States, Britain, Japan and 14 other countries issued a joint statement accusing the WHO of delaying the study of the source of the virus for too long, and the investigation team did not obtain all the information.
A White House spokesman said he did not believe the report was consistent with the importance and impact of the outbreak on the global community, and said China was not transparent and called for a second phase of the investigation.
Former U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo condemned WHO Director General Ted Tam for helping the Chinese Communist Party cover up the outbreak and said WHO was complicit in the Chinese Communist Party. The report is a double-cross between WHO and the Chinese Communist Party to deceive public opinion, with Tan conspiring with Xi Jinping to cover up the truth.
In a rare turn of events, WHO Director General Tan Desai, who has been whitewashing the Chinese Communist Party, joined in the condemnation.
For the first time, he questioned the “highly improbable laboratory leak” and said that the WHO mission had been blocked from obtaining data in China, “and I don’t think this assessment is broad enough” and that he might send an additional mission back to China to investigate.
On March 31, Dr. Yan Limeng, a Chinese virologist who fled the United States, published her third report on the Chinese Communist virus (New Coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2) on the zenodo website, debunking the WHO report as misleading internationally. Her report refutes the leftist media’s labeling of the laboratory theory of origin as a “conspiracy theory”.
Yan Limeng, who published two reports on the CCP virus in the fall of 2020, was the first scientist to reveal the CCP’s cover-up of the outbreak. In her first report, she used extensive evidence and logical analysis to demonstrate why the CCP virus must be a laboratory product and how it could be easily manufactured according to well-known concepts and established techniques.
The second report reveals the nature of the CCP virus as an unrestricted biological weapon. In both scientific reports, Yan Limeng and her team concluded that the virus came from the CCP’s Wuhan P4 laboratory and was a biological weapon for the military.
After the publication of Yan Limeng’s team’s first report, it was attacked in two “peer-reviewed” articles by four scientists, including Dr. Gigi Gronvall of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.
These two reviews were used by CNN and other media outlets to refute Dr. Yan’s report, describing the laboratory origin theory as a “conspiracy theory. On the basis of these media reports, the CCP again promoted the idea that the virus came from outside the laboratory.
The third scientific report by Yan Limeng’s team, entitled “Two uninvited “peer review” failures further prove the Wuhan laboratory origin of the CCP virus and the validity of Dr. Yan Limeng’s report,” is a 68-page report that again focuses on the truth about the origin of the virus.
The following links are available to download the third scientific report by Yan Limeng.
Yan Limeng believes that the reason why the truth of the epidemic is not known to most people is because many so-called scientists, out of interest, deliberately concealed and covered up, lab origin theory labeled as “conspiracy theory”.
The first part of the third scientific report is Dr. Limon Yan’s response to a review by the MIT Press, and the second part is a response to a review by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health and Safety.
In addition, Dr. Yan includes an opening statement at the beginning of the report that summarizes the major incidents of “unfettered scientific misinformation,” including the various cover-ups by individuals close to the Chinese Communist regime, and Dr. Yan’s own continuing efforts to uncover the truth about the CCP virus.
The report’s introduction states that the origin of the CCP virus is an issue of worldwide concern. The laboratory nature of this virus is obvious, and certain individuals portray it as a great mystery. The root cause of this state of affairs is massive, multi-disciplinary, and deliberate scientific misinformation. To overcome this scientific misinformation and reveal the true nature of the CCP virus, we have published two scientific reports.
The first report uses extensive evidence and logical analysis to show why the CCP virus must be a laboratory product and how it can be conveniently built by following well-known concepts and established techniques.
The second report exposed the massive, organized scientific fraud through which the CCP virus was discovered as an unrestricted biological weapon. Our efforts were immediately met with great resistance.
The third report noted that within ten days of the publication of the first report, two self-proclaimed “peer-reviewed” articles appeared that specifically criticized our report. The first review was published by four scientists at the Johns Hopkins University Center for Health Security, led by Dr. Gigi Gronvall.
The second review was published in the MIT Press by Robert Gallo. A team of four scientists led by Dr. Robert Gallo produced the review. While we welcome critical reviews of reports, such reviews must be honest, logical, evidence-based, and conducted by qualified scientists.
However, neither of these reviews met any of the criteria. Unfortunately, these poor reviews continue to be used by the media to smear our reporting, labeling laboratory origin theories as “conspiracy theories,” and further suppressing the truth about the origin of the CCP virus.
Yan Limeng points out that the CCP has built on these media reports to amplify its own voice and put forward the falsified theory that the CCP virus must have come from nature. To combat this misinformation, a point-by-point response to these comments is provided in this report.
Yan Limeng expressed her hope that the third report will help the world recognize the ongoing campaign of misinformation and that the virus is an unrestricted biological weapon developed by the Chinese Communist regime. This is critical to defeating the CCP virus pandemic and protecting the global community from future biological weapons attacks.
Recent Comments