A few days ago, the Shanghai authorities’ newly revised “Shanghai Real Population Service and Management Regulations” (hereinafter referred to as the regulations) policy was introduced and will be officially implemented from today (April 1). It is mentioned that people who come to Shanghai to stay more than 24 hours need to do registration, otherwise they will face a fine of up to 5,000 yuan (RMB), the news has attracted a large number of netizens’ hot debate.
Since April 1, Shanghai will implement the above-mentioned new rules. The regulations mentioned that, in addition to the original residence in Shanghai city and foreign provinces and municipalities, people who come to Shanghai for medical treatment, schooling, tourism, official activities, visiting friends and relatives and other short stay in Shanghai are also included in the scope of management. If such people stay in Shanghai for more than 24 hours, they need to take the initiative to register their personal information on the online “one network to do” platform, including name, current place of residence, type of identity documents and other details.
In addition, the hotel industry, B&B, online rooms and other places providing accommodation services, employing people to work in Shanghai employers, also need to “one network to do” timely registration of information related to personnel. The “one-day tour”, the same day of official activities and transportation to and from the people are not included.
The new provisions of the penalty also from the original “200 yuan to 1000 yuan” to the current “500 yuan to 5000 yuan”, since the date of implementation of the provisions, do not fulfill the information registration obligations, will face the aforementioned penalties.
Once the news came out, it attracted a lot of widespread concern among netizens, netizens have said, the late Qing Dynasty are not so engaged, is this engaged in Shanghai alone?
Under the relevant topics, netizens have left messages spitting.
“Start restricting the movement of people, history is repeating itself again.”
“The Shanghai government may be bad in the head, landing visa really have you, Shanghai independent, Shanghai State or called Shanghai Special Administrative Region, the fancy government.”
“I want to go to Shanghai to play in the near future, may I ask if the exclusion of Chinese in Shanghai is still serious now?”
“Nothing to do? Why don’t you just get a cross-province visa.”
“Awesome Shanghai country, when the leek, can not have ideas.”
“It seems that the light ‘with the application code’ is not enough, or the provisions through the ‘pen tip’ implemented down, Shanghai is the first pilot, the next is Beijing.”
For “a network to do” registration information, netizens said: “Now people have enough no privacy, and cell phones can be monitored, what is the point of engaging in this? The traffic is so few, the camera is so advanced, directly count the number of heads on the line, the population information is reported, that privacy can guarantee confidentiality? Why not just implant a GPS in the ID card?”
Some netizens ridiculed: “Shanghai seems to be back to the rent era, running to join the one country two systems, another round of the start of the rent visa to start, Shanghai took the lead on China to implement the visa on arrival, simply build a country, if I exceed 24 hours and 1 minute, will be arrested by the police, or repatriated? Or be killed?” There are also netizens who say that it is better to send “Shanghai” photos directly.
The Shanghai government’s response is not well received by the public
As the above “24 hours in Shanghai to register” the “new rules” in the network caused a lot of concern and trolling, April 1, the Shanghai Municipal Government issued a response that the netizens on the interpretation of the provisions of the wrong, and re-explained that The “regulations” clearly include people who come to Shanghai for a short time in the scope of the actual population, in order to enhance the effectiveness of services, individuals can register voluntarily according to their needs, not mandatory requirements.
After Shanghai’s new regulations were tweeted by a large number of Chinese netizens, the Shanghai government issued a response on April 1, saying it was a misinterpretation.
In this regard, netizens do not buy it, have left messages questioning: “Yesterday, I saw clearly is not registered to find a fine, since it is not mandatory requirements, then send this regulation what? Sick? Non-stop squeeze the space of freedom, see everyone’s opposition to the big, and to explain? Issued in the vernacular, but also let people misinterpret? How is it misinterpreted? The whole country is misinterpreted? The people who wrote the document and reviewed it did not misinterpret it?”
There are also netizens said that arbitrary decisions, changing overnight, as child’s play, began to say that fines now become voluntary, who is bluffing? See the strong reaction of the masses, and take back the words. This release a collection, the old routine, when the number / purchase restrictions are not the whole thing? The first release of harsh words, found that the masses reacted too strongly, waved their hands and said that people misunderstood. Many regulations love to leave ambiguous space in order to enforce the law when the flexibility of the “law” to deal with, this time unlucky to be uncovered only.
Recent Comments