What will happen if the Chinese Communist Party dares to declare war on Taiwan?
According to an op-ed by former newspaper editor-in-chief Hong Boxer, if the Chinese Communist Party still sees the annexation of Taiwan as a goal that cannot be changed, then a confrontation is inevitable.
If the Chinese Communist Party dares to declare war, the United States has already set up a posture to surround the Chinese Communist Party, the United States, Japan, Australia, India and Taiwan allied forces, the Chinese Communist Party is looking for Russia to help the fist, North Korea’s economic deterioration, the appearance of a fight, fireworks can still be, really join the war, is tantamount to South Korea into the war, North Korea’s hungry people will definitely revolt, Russia is also stuck in economic difficulties, the war capital is insufficient, the final or the Chinese Communist Party alone on the field, the South China Peninsula countries can only
The only thing the countries of the South China Peninsula can do is to watch the show.
If there are smart people inside the Chinese Communist Party, they will definitely advise Xi not to go on, modern warfare is not based on the number of people, relying on money and technological power, although the Chinese Communist Party does not eat this set of universal values, but, want to defeat the world, no money or can not do things, look at history, no money countries first surrender, this is the truth.
Please Department of souvenirs think clearly, engage in Boxer Rebellion, announced that China woke up, so that primary and secondary school pink inner boiling a little, this is okay, if the war is taken seriously, the first to be destroyed is the Chinese Communist Party red regime.
Ko Wen-je: Anti-Communist is the world situation in the next 15 years
Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je recently said that human rights in China really need to be improved and that the anti-communist wave will be the world trend for the next 15 years. The Chinese Communist Party has incited domestic public opinion to attack international brands, including H&M, Nike, and Adidas, for refusing to use “Xinjiang blood cotton. The term “Xinjiang blood cotton” refers to cotton from Xinjiang that the Chinese Communist Party authorities force laborers to pick. The Chinese Communist Party is trying to blackmail these brands to put pressure on the international community.
Some pro-communist artists in Taiwan have also come out to stand up for the Chinese Communist Party and participate in the boycott of foreign goods. In response to the phenomenon of Taiwanese artists choosing sides, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je said in a media interview on March 28 that the Chinese Communist Party really needs to improve in terms of human rights and that the anti-communist wave will remain a world situation for the next 15 years.
He said frankly that globalization has become “hemispheric”, which is an international trend, and frankly speaking, it is choosing sides.
The president of Taiwan’s Legislative Yuan, You Xi-kun, commented on Facebook, “The boycott of Xinjiang cotton is no longer a political issue, but a human rights issue!”
U.S. media: Chinese Communist Party’s United Front groups target black American groups
According to a March 28 report in the U.S. media outlet The Daily Caller, U.S. officials have discovered that the Chinese Communist Party’s United Front Group think tank has been reaching out to traditionally black American universities and the Congressional Black Caucus since 2014, and has established close ties with its members.
Compiled by Voice of Hope, it refers to pre-1964 institutions of higher Education in the United States that were exclusively for blacks. There are 105 (Historically Black Colleges and Universities, HBCUs) such universities in the United States.
CIA Director William Burns testified at his Senate confirmation hearing in February that he was suspicious of the activities of the China-U.S. Exchange Foundation (CUSEF) during his Time leading the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, the report said. He severed ties with CUSEF out of concern for “Communist influence operations” because of the foundation’s ties to Communist organizations.
The China-United States Exchange Foundation is considered a Communist think tank based in Hong Kong and is also suspected of being a Communist front organization. Its outreach program to the black community is part of its larger plan.
Most of the foundation’s contacts with traditionally black universities and members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) are arranged by Wilson Global Communications, a Washington, D.C.-based communications firm, the report said.
According to the company’s most recent Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) filing on March 22, the Mid-America Exchange Foundation has paid the company $89,844 over the past six months to hold virtual meetings with leaders and students at traditionally black colleges and universities.
Since January 2017, CACF has paid Wilson & Company $667,641 to provide “communications and public relations services, including outreach to U.S. elected officials” to CACF. The firm also coordinated travel to China for CACF-sponsored college students and traditional black college leaders, and arranged contacts between CACF and members of the Congressional Black Caucus.
According to documents filed by the U.S. Department of Justice, the FBI provided security briefings to the heads of traditionally black universities before they traveled to China.
Burns said the Chinese Communist Party deployed such organizations to contact U.S. institutions as “part of a government-wide program …… to try to influence political, economic and cultural developments in the United States for the benefit of the Chinese Communist Party.”
San Francisco Asian Anti-Discrimination March: No Anti-Communist Strife Within Chinese
Signs and banners carried by anti-communists who support equal rights for Asians. (Courtesy of Wyatt White)
Radio Free Asia reports that Asians in San Francisco held a massive anti-discrimination march on March 27. Among them, anti-communists from mainland China and Hong Kong and pro-communist ralliers engaged in verbal and physical confrontations, reflecting the differences in political views among the marchers.
A clash between participants of the 11:00 a.m. event.
Anti-communists and rallyists in a close verbal altercation. (Photo by Sun Cheng, first published exclusively by RFA)
At that time, several anti-communists from China and Hong Kong were holding signs with the words “Stop Asian Hate”, “Free Uyghurs” and “Stop Asian Hate”, “Free Uyghurs” and “Restoration of Hong Kong, Revolution of the Times” banners in the square. Some of the other rally participants became disgusted with the anti-communists, shouting insults and asking them to “get out”, and there were close verbal and even physical confrontations.
During the confrontation, some anti-Communists were confronted by each other. Bay Area pro-democracy activist Hu Jinwei said that when he held up a “Stop Asian Hate” banner and a “Restoration of the Hong Kong Revolution” flag, the rallyists reacted violently: “They kept pushing me, pushing me out into the street, very much wanting to beat me up. They wanted to beat me up, but because there were police officers present, they intervened and said we could stand across the street.”
Another event participant, Mr. Wu, said, “I held up a sign, and one side of the sign said ‘Stop Asian Hate’ and the other side said ‘CCP is real racist’, and a young man came over and tried to rip my sign off.”
Ethan Liu of “Hokies in the Bay Area” asked the anti-communists to leave the meeting. According to public information, current Fujianese in the Bay Area President Yang Baohai and Vice President Yang Xiaochuan initiated and organized a rally against the Hong Kong protests in San Francisco on August 20, 2019.
Why is the Chinese Communist Party tough on the United States? Why is the Chinese Communist propaganda missing a year of Xinchu
alt=
After the U.S.-China meeting in Alaska, the People’s Daily and other official media immediately launched the hashtag “A Comparison of the Two Xin Chou Years,” which set off a wave of discussion on the Chinese mainland internet and has been on Weibo’s hot search list for days. The official propaganda of the Communist Party of China (CPC) suggested 120 years, referring to the period from 1901 to this year.
Commentator Shi Shan said in an opinion piece in Epoch Times that there should actually be three Xin Chou years, not two, out of the 120 years. The third Xin Chou year that the CCP skipped was particularly tragic.
1961 was the 12th year of the CCP’s establishment of power in mainland China, and 1961 was also the last year of the CCP’s three-year famine. From 1959 to 1961, tens of millions of people in mainland China died unnaturally.
How many people died in those three years? One of the most conservative estimates found was actually by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, which reported in 1962 that at least 5 million people had starved to death in the Great Famine in mainland China. By the end of the last century, after various official and semi-official figures came out from within the Chinese Communist Party, the basic Perception was that a minimum of 25 million and a maximum of 45 million people had died in mainland China in the previous three years, including 1961, the year of Xin Chou.
According to information, during the Great Famine, 1.05 million people died of starvation in Xinyang, Henan Province, and many villages were completely dead, needless to say, hundreds and thousands of extinct families, extinct villages, the number of deaths in a village is not a small number.
Man-eating people
Throughout history, as long as the phenomenon of cannibalism, it means that the famine has reached a fairly serious degree.
In the three-year famine, most of the cannibalism is to eat the corpses of the dead. Generally divided into two categories, one is to the field to steal the newly buried dead body to eat, the second is not buried before the dead in the ground slaughtered and eaten, this situation occurs more within the Family or neighbors.
In the case of cannibalism, there is nothing more tragic than to kill the living, especially their relatives to feed the hungry. Such cases were not uncommon in the three-year famine.
According to Liang Zhiyuan’s article, “People Eating People in Bo County, Anhui Province during the Great Famine”, Zhang Zuogang recalled that in the spring of 1960, my family, Zhang Han, a family of four, died of starvation after two people died, with only a thin daughter by her side, and she was forced to starve and lost her mind, killing her daughter and cooking her to eat, after which she became insane and sometimes called her daughter’s name.
The Chinese Communist Party refused to rescue the starving people
According to the recollection of Zhang Shufan, former commissioner of Xinyang Executive Office of Henan Province, “At that time, so many people died of starvation in Xinyang area, not that there was no Food, the granaries of all sizes belonging to were full.”
Zhang Shufan’s secretary Yu Dehong also later confirmed that the top was indeed not allowed to open the warehouse to release grain. He said, “We still had 1.1 billion pounds in the whole region at that time, and that was the grain of the national treasury, which could not be touched.”
The CCP also refused foreign aid, such as the U.S. offer to provide China with 5 million tons of wheat at the time, but it was rejected by CCP envoy Wang Bingnan, who conveyed Mao’s suggestion that if the U.S. needed Chinese help, China was willing to tighten its belt to aid some rice and wheat.
In addition, while China was starving to death, the Communist Party was still engaged in foreign aid, nuclear weapons, building palaces, the Sanmenxia Project, Gold reserves, grain storage and brewing, etc. At the same time, the Communist Party also blocked famine victims from fleeing the famine, which aggravated the disaster.
Beijing “Counter-sanctions” British Doctor on Xinjiang, Over 400 Scholars Worldwide Sign Letter Condemning Political Censorship
Last Monday (March 22), several countries in Europe and the United States announced on the same day that they would sanction four Chinese officials and one entity over human rights issues in Xinjiang. On Friday, the Chinese Communist Party announced sanctions against nine individuals and four entities in the United Kingdom, including Dr. Joanne Nicola Smith Finley, a scholar on Xinjiang issues at Newcastle University.
Dr. Finley has studied Xinjiang issues for 30 years and has been providing information to law firms, refugee organizations and NGOs in the UK, US, Canada and various European countries since 2017.
The Chinese Communist Party’s sanctions against academics have sparked discontent among more than 400 Western academics, who published an open letter in the British newspaper The Times denouncing the Communist Party’s political censorship as a serious danger to academic freedom in universities around the world. The open letter points out that universities are not branches of the state, but autonomous academic institutions dedicated to the pursuit of truth.
Andreas Fulda, a professor in the Department of Sociology at the University of Nottingham, UK, who participated in the joint open letter, pointed out that the CCP does not understand academic freedom, and that Finlay not only criticized the CCP, she also criticized the British government! This is academic freedom. It is normal for academics to criticize the Chinese Communist Party, and the American government, the British government, and the German government have all been criticized by academics. Can we only criticize Trump and not President Xi? The Chinese Communist Party does not accept such academic freedom because it is afraid of our criticism. A political party like the CCP makes such unreasonable demands, so we should say “no”!
According to Froda, this open letter signed by more than 400 scholars is a turning point in the “rejection of self-censorship” by mainstream scholars in the West. In the past, self-censorship was very common in Western academia, and many scholars were afraid of offending the Chinese Communist Party, not being able to go to China, not getting a visa, or being blacklisted.
Marie Holzman, a French sinologist, says that many professors in China must obey the authorities, and that scholars abroad who publicly mention the human rights of the Uyghurs will be punished by the Chinese Communist Party. The Chinese Communist Party wants to control professors all over the world, which is very unacceptable to professors. The Chinese Communist Party wants to control professors all over the world, which is very unacceptable to professors.
Because for professors, the basic principle is to be independent and have a conscience.
Recent Comments