Close the election loophole! Trump praised the Democratic Party for its strong protest against the tough law amendment in Joe State
The new bill in the state of Joe is aimed at the “Georgia Code” (Georgia Code), related to elections, voting to make comprehensive changes. The bill was passed by the state Senate on the 8th by a vote of 29-20 and sent to the state House of Representatives. The state House of Representatives passed the amendment by a vote of 100-75 on the 25th and immediately handed it to the state Senate for passage by a vote of 34-20.
The World Journal reported that Georgia Republican Governor Brian Kemp formally signed the Republican-led state election reform bill on the night of the 25th in the midst of strong protests from the Democratic Party, limiting communication voting and expanding the legislature’s electoral control.
Biden 26 criticized the new law in Joe State as the “Jim Crow laws of the 21st century” (Jim Crow laws, segregation laws), calling on Congress to pass the election reform bill.
Kemp countered that the new election law does not discriminate, and said Biden and his assistant did not read it properly.
According to the new law, voters must show identification to apply for communication voting, and will set up a voter registration system to cross-check voter eligibility, the number and location of ballot boxes will also be limited; people are also prohibited from providing Food and drink to those waiting to vote, violators of the law.
The picture shows former U.S. President Donald Trump making his first speech at CPAC since leaving office on February 28.
Trump issued a statement on Friday, Feb. 26, praising the efforts of Joe Republicans for their success in promoting election reform.
In a statement released Friday through his Save America PAC, Trump said, “Congratulations to Georgia and the Georgia legislature for changing their election rules and regulations. They have learned from the tragic experience of the 2020 presidential election and won’t allow it to happen again. It’s unfortunate that these changes weren’t made sooner!”
Former President Trump is pictured issuing a statement praising Joe State Republicans for passing the election reform bill.
General Flynn’s Family sues CNN for $75 million for defamation
General Michael Flynn, President Trump’s first national security adviser, is pictured.
Two family members of Trump’s first national security adviser, General Michael Flynn, recently sued CNN for $75 million.
The two plaintiffs are General Flynn’s brother, John Flynn, and sister-in-law, Leslie Flynn, Voice of Hope compiled reports. They say CNN has defamed them by linking them to the far-right QAnon conspiracy theory movement in a video report on Feb. 4 of this year. The lawsuit has now been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
In a related report, U.S. media outlet Breitbart News said that people have been waiting a long, long Time for the left-wing media’s ongoing smear campaign against conservatives, and now they are finally suing media outlets like CNN and The New York Times.
The aforementioned lawsuit claims that in a CNN video titled “CNN Goes Deeper into QAnon Followers Rally” broadcast in early February, CNN reporter Sullivan reported on a pro-QAnon rally in Arizona, saying, “‘Where one person goes, everyone else goes. everywhere he goes, everyone else will follow,’ which is the tagline of QAnon as promoted by Michael Flynn.”
In support of this claim, CNN also aired a video that General Flynn posted on social media on July 4, 2020. The video showed members of the Flynn family saying the phrase before General Flynn took the oath of allegiance to the U.S. Constitution.
The plaintiffs point out that the phrase was originally inscribed on a sailboat owned by President John F. Kennedy and had nothing to do with the QAnon movement, and that CNN’s defamatory intent is clear in that the video deliberately ignores that they were actually swearing allegiance to the U.S. Constitution and does not mention that they said “God Bless America,” but rather “Instead, it “deceptively suggests that the Flynns were pledging allegiance to QAnon.
Booming: Beijing Targets U.S. Companies, Intends to Influence U.S. Government Decisions
Former U.S. Deputy National Security Adviser Matt Pottinger is shown in this photo.
Former deputy national security adviser Matt Pottinger warned in an article in the Wall Street Journal on 26 June, titled “Beijing Targets U.S. Businesses,” that the Chinese Communist authorities are making every effort to bring in U.S. companies, because as the U.S. and Chinese Communist governments compete fiercely over strategy and ideology, corporate tendencies will determine As the U.S. and Chinese Communist governments battle it out over strategy and ideology, corporate tendencies will determine which side wins.
The article, quoted by RFE/RL, said Bo Ming told U.S. companies about what is happening in China and the United States, “The message from Beijing is clear and unmistakable. You have to make a choice, and if you want to do business in China, you have to do it at the expense of American values. You will meticulously ignore the ethnic cleansing of ethnic and religious minorities in China; you must ignore Beijing’s reneging on its major commitments, including the international treaty guaranteeing Hong Kong a ‘high degree of autonomy’; and you must stop engaging with security-conscious officials in your own capital unless you are lobbying them on behalf of Beijing. “
At the same time, Beijing wants the world to rely on China forever, and in doing so, achieve political goals,” argues Booming. Xi Jinping made it clear at this year’s National People’s Congress that he wants China to stop relying on developed countries for high-end products, and instead wants developed countries to rely heavily on China for high-tech products and raw materials. In other words, ‘decoupling’ is precisely Beijing’s strategy, as long as decoupling benefits Beijing. More importantly, the Chinese Communist government is no longer hiding this strategy”.
He said that Australia was previously blackmailed by the Chinese Communist Party‘s tactic of “using the economy to force the government”.
Bo Ming stressed that the United States and China are “running a marathon, and only one side can win. If the U.S. can’t get things right in the next four years, it will lose the race, although it may be many years before it realizes it lost long ago. “Beijing is correct in its view that U.S. business leaders, boardrooms and investors, will be the key to determining who gets to the next level in the U.S. and China.”
Communist China Sanctions U.S. Religious Freedom Commission Commissioner Blinken for Condemnation
On Saturday (March 27), the Chinese Communist Party imposed retaliatory sanctions on the United States, three Canadian individuals and a Canadian congressional agency. The U.S. State Department issued a statement that evening condemning the CCP’s move.
On Saturday, the Chinese Foreign Ministry issued a statement on its website sanctioning Gayle Manchin, chairman of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom; Tony Perkins, vice chairman of the Commission; Michael Chong, a Canadian member of Parliament; and the International Human Rights Commission, part of the Canadian Parliament’s Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development.
In a statement on the State Department’s website, Secretary Blinken said the United States condemns the unfounded sanctions imposed by the Chinese Communist Party on two commissioners of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), in an apparent retaliation for U.S. sanctions against Chinese (Communist Party) officials involved in serious human rights abuses in Xinjiang. “Beijing’s attempts to intimidate and silence those who speak out for human rights and fundamental freedoms will only exacerbate international scrutiny of the ongoing genocide and Crimes Against Humanity in Xinjiang.”
The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom is an independent, cross-party U.S. federal government commission that monitors overseas violations of freedom of religion or belief and makes policy recommendations to the president, secretary of state and Congress.
Canadian President Justin Trudeau also called the Chinese Communist Party’s sanctions “unacceptable action. He tweeted, “We will continue to work with our international partners to defend human rights around the world.”
Chinese Communist Party counter-sanctions against U.S.-Canadian individual entities Canadian lawmaker says he was awarded “Medal of Honor”
The photo shows Canadian federal Rep. Michael Chong.
The European Union, the United States, Britain and Canada have joined forces to sanction officials in Xinjiang, and the Chinese Communist Party has announced “counter-sanctions” against the EU and Britain. On Saturday (27), the Chinese Communist Party announced sanctions against three individuals and one entity in the United States and Canada. The sanctioned Canadian lawmakers said they would be proud of this.
Zhuang Wenhao, a Canadian federal Conservative Party politician, was sanctioned by the Chinese Communist Party on Saturday (27). In a tweet, Chong responded that people living freely under the rule of law have a responsibility to speak out against the Chinese Communist Party’s crackdown on Hong Kong and its genocide of the Uighurs. Chong also said he would wear the Chinese Communist Party sanctions “as a badge of honor.
Canadian Conservative Party leader Erin O’Toole also tweeted that she was proud of the work done by Chong’s MP. He added that the actions of MPs Chuang and Kenny Chiu also demonstrate how Canadians of Chinese heritage can be proud of their Chinese history and Culture while making a firm critique of communist repression.
Worried about border crisis, Trump may visit U.S.-Mexico border in recent days
Photo shows U.S. President Donald Trump visiting the U.S.-Mexico border in Arizona last June to inspect the border wall.
In an interview with radio station The Michael Berry Show on the 25th, President Trump’s aide Jason Miller said that Trump may visit the U.S.-Mexico border soon amid the growing border crisis. “It’s something that President Trump really cares about, so at some point in the future, we’ll see him make that trip.” “I know he’ll do that.”
Miller also said the reason Trump hasn’t been to the southern border since Biden took office is because he wants Biden himself to see firsthand the failure that reversing Trump’s immigration policies has brought. He also said Trump told him that if he remained in the presidency, there would not be the current surge in illegal immigration.
Lightning birth change who said? Harris was appointed by Biden on Wednesday to head the U.S. border crisis, and on Friday she stated [compiled by Apollo.com
“No conscience” U.S. Heritage Foundation rejects 6-figure donation from big tech giants
The Heritage Foundation, one of the oldest conservative think tanks in the U.S., recently rejected a six-figure donation from big tech companies Google and Facebook to defend free speech and resist censorship of conservative speech by big tech companies.
According to U.S. news site Axios, Kay Cole James, president of the Heritage Foundation, sent a letter to Google CEO Sundar Pichai and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg stating that the conservative nonprofit would reject about $400,000 in donations from the two companies.
This is a major move for the Heritage Foundation. In the past, they have accepted large donations from big tech companies such as Google and Facebook. Google has reportedly donated $1.55 million to the organization, and Facebook has given $275,000.
James told Pichai, “We cannot in good conscience accept money from a company that repeatedly and blatantly suppresses conservative speech on its platform.”
Axios reports that the foundation turned down a huge $225,000 donation from Google. They also said they would refund Facebook’s $150,000 donation.
In his letter, James stressed that the organization is helping Congress change the antitrust law that currently effectively protects big tech companies from liability for content posted on their social media platforms; the Heritage Foundation is reviewing those proposals and cannot allow anyone to think that the foundation’s conclusions were influenced by donations from big tech companies.
Recent Comments