California’s collapse: a haven for pedophiles and LGBTQs, a hell for normal parents, all likely to go to prison

Sexual abuse of minors, even young children, is a crime against God and humanity.

In fact, I strongly object to the use of the word “Pedophila” as if raping young children is a psychological disease like “fetish” or “foot fetish”. Pedophila has succeeded in alleviating the existing feelings of disgust and disgust towards the rape of young children.

Just last August 31, the California House and Assembly passed a bizarre and evil bill called SB 145. It was questioned by the public as an attempt to “legalize pedophilia” and allow these demons to continue to harm and rape uneducated children. What is this new bill all about?

The bill passed the California State Senate by a vote of 41 to 18, and the State Assembly by a vote of 23 to 10. Lawmakers who oppose the bill argue that it provides criminals with the opportunity to justify sex with minors under 18, in any way, and to avoid mandatory registration.

The outrageous bill was signed by Governor Gavin Newsom on September 11 of last year.

Far-left California Governor Gavin Newsom (D)

Under current California law, because minors under the age of 18 cannot have consensual sexual intercourse, it is a crime and offense for an adult to have sex with a minor between the ages of 14 and 17, even if both parties are consensual.

The bill amends the age limit for registering sex offenders to add: “If the difference in age between the parties involved is less than 10 years, the judge shall determine directly whether to place the offender on the California sex offender registry, regardless of the form of sexual intercourse, including oral or anal sex with a minor.

In other words, if a 20-year-old adult sexually assaults an 11-year-old girl, a California judge may find the adult not guilty because the difference is only 9 years old.

As we can see here, the new bill gives judges greater discretion in cases of “sex with minors,” while at the same Time blurring the law on whether sex with minors is illegal, directly harming the legal interests of some minors. The new bill was severely rejected by the public, who questioned the 10-year age gap that would allow criminals to legally abuse minors, even young children.

Once the matter broke out, it suffered numerous strong accusations from netizens, who have tweeted on Twitter that: reject the new bill, minors never consent to sex, they are still children.

Some people also said, “The authorities are disgusting, this is the worst bill ever seen.”

Not only that, but the bill has even been opposed by some lawmakers. Even California Democratic Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez, who debated the bill in the Assembly on Aug. 31, said, “In my opinion, as a mother, I can’t understand how sex between a 24-year-old and a 14-year-old can be consensual and not be a registrable offense “?

Gonzalez made it clear: a 10-year age gap is just too big! She stated that as a mother, no matter who the object of intercourse is? In what form? These are not reasons to condone a 24-year-old having intercourse with someone 10 years younger than herself.

California Democratic Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez was interviewed and said she could not accept SB 145.

Republican Senator Shannon Grove also said with great abhorrence: “How ridiculous it would be if the bill was signed by the governor and it was legal for a 24-year-old adult to have any sexual relations with a 15-year-old.”

The surface speaks of gender equality. In fact, it is legalizing pedophilia?

As we can see from the bill’s fine print, parts of the bill actually stand in the interests of the LGBTQ community (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning) and are somewhat anti-discriminatory. This is because a large part of it refers to the rationalization of oral and anal sex in sexual relationships, which requires only consensual sex.

Scott Wiener, the state senator who authored SB 145, said that Senate Bill 145 is an anti-discrimination law that would end discrimination against LGBTQ people who commit sex crimes. They are often unable to have vaginal intercourse and are therefore vulnerable to mandatory registration as sex offenders. He pointed out that the California sex offender registry is outdated and “thinks oral sex is worse than vaginal sex.

Not only that, Scott Wiener argues: It used to be that a 19-year-old boy with a 17-year-old girlfriend would be legally convicted of rape if they had sex. But not anymore, “SB145” law states that judges do not have to treat 19-year-old boys as criminals because of their sexual behavior …… This is a great recognition of the youthfulness of sexual freedom and a democratic equality.

However, these claims were not well received by the internet, with a posting directly on Facebook: “PEDOPHILIA (pedophilia) is now legal in California.” The text said, “Now a 21-year-old can have sex with an 11-year-old and not be classified as a sex offender. This is unbelievable California”! The post went viral and has now been read by tens of millions of people, bringing SB 145 to the attention of the public and the public’s opposition to it.

PEDOPHILIA is now LIGAL in California Facebook post that has been viewed by tens of millions of people

It was once accused by the internet of being “the worst bill in California for somehow allowing pedophilia to exist. But even in the face of such righteous criticism, the authorities have yet to provide a reasonable response.

And the pedophile groups involved in the legislation attempted to deflect the conversation. Los Angeles County District Attorney Jackie Lacey argued that the bill, which allows judges and prosecutors to make their own judgments about whether an alleged offender’s behavior constitutes sexual assault, regardless of sexual orientation, is a much-needed equality.

This rhetoric sounds very “politically correct” and in the interest of gender equality, but in reality it is absurd. Why should a group of victims with an age difference of 10 years be excluded, and should children who are 10 years different from the offender deserve to be sexually abused? Is this the so-called equality? The connivance of the law will only breed more evil.

In fact, not only the United States today is legally permissive of child sex crimes, but also many countries around the world are ambiguous in their legislation on underage sex crimes. The leniency of lawmakers has largely allowed these demons to start doing whatever they want. They are happy to prey on defenseless children who will not be sentenced to death anyway.

These “politically correct” leftist politicians and so-called “progressive affirmative action” activists have become the umbrella for the pedophile criminal enterprise. And children will go to hell at a young age and become hunted objects.

In California, young children will become the prey of pedophile rings

Biden Administration Encourages Military Transgender

In October 2020 Harris campaigned on California being a national role model to govern America as California if Biden and she are elected. California is a pedophile and LGBTQ paradise, and the Biden Administration has indeed followed California’s example by immediately overturning Trump‘s ban and signing an executive order allowing transgender and transsexual people to join the military on January 25.

In the executive order on transgenderism signed by Biden on January 25, a clause was inserted to “allow all qualified Americans to serve our country in uniform. The order calls for “the establishment of a process by which transgender service members can change their gender while serving in the military.”

Transgender U.S. Army Capt. Jennifer Sims shows her uniform during an interview with The Associated Press in Beratzhausen, near Regensburg, Germany, July 29, 2017. (AP Photo/Matthias Schrader)

Later, both Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and Veterans Affairs Secretary Denis McDonough specifically marked in their memos that “gender reassignment surgery is now an additional benefit.” Austin wrote that “all servicemembers will be ensured access to all medically necessary and legally authorized gender reassignment care.” In an email from the VA to employees, McDonough also said the necessary steps will be evaluated to eliminate the exclusion of “gender reassignment” (gender confirmation surgery) from the medical benefits package.

Online charts from the Philadelphia Center for Transgender Surgery show that gender reassignment surgeries for men and women come in a variety of forms and cost $100,000 to $200,000 cumulatively. In his order, Biden said the cost of military sex changes has a minimal impact on health care costs, but a USA Today 2019 survey refutes his claim. The investigation revealed that the Defense Department spent $8 million just to treat 1,500 transgender officers, including hormone treatments and some surgeries. It’s unclear why the surgeries were allowed at the time. A federal study shows that more than 15,000 active-duty service members and 134,000 veterans have identified as transgender.

California SB1322: Legalizing Teen, Child Prostitution

SB1322 was introduced by Senator Holly Mitchell (D-Los Angeles) and introduced in 2017 to legalize underage prostitution. The bill was introduced by Senator Holly Mitchell (D-Los Angeles) and started in 2017, and it was designed to brutalize teenagers under the banner of protecting them. California Governor Jerry Brown signed SB1322 into law in September 2016, and it took effect on New Year’s Day 2017.

Dissenting California Republican Assemblyman Travis Allen wrote to the media to express his displeasure, headlining his article, “California Democrats legalize child prostitution. (California Democrats legalize child prostitution). In his submission, Allen expressed concern that SB 1322 would increase the number of minors in street prostitution (due to the exemption from criminal penalties) and bring a larger cash flow to prostitution rings. He also cites legal opinion that the bill would open the door to human trafficking and that children would be used in criminal activities, trapping them in more serious exploitation.

In June 2012, the FBI and police rescued 79 children and arrested 104 alleged pimps in a three-day law enforcement crackdown on teen prostitution. Photo: CNN

Republican Assemblyman Travis Allen: As of January 1, underage prostitution will be legal in California. Yes, you read that right.

SB 1322 prohibits law enforcement from arresting sex workers under the age of 18, whether they are soliciting, involved in or intending to engage in prostitution. As a result, young girls (and boys) in California will soon be free to trade sex for money without fear of arrest or prosecution.

This highly destructive legislation was sponsored and passed by the progressive Democrats who control California’s state government with a two-thirds super majority. To their credit, they sincerely believe that decriminalizing underage prostitution is a good public policy to help victims of sex trafficking. Unfortunately, the reality is that legalizing underage prostitution suffers from a fatal flaw characteristic of “progressive left” policymaking: it ignores experience, common sense and, most importantly, human nature – especially its dark side.

The consequences of how the real villains – the pimps and other traffickers of tragic children – will respond to this new law are not hard to foresee. Prostitution rings and traffickers will still be illegal, whether it involves running adult women or underage girls. But legalizing child prostitution will only incentivize the increased exploitation of underage girls.

Immunity from arrest means that law enforcement cannot interfere with minors engaging in prostitution – which means a larger and more lucrative cash flow for pimps. In short, more time on the streets and less time in jail means more money for pimps, who can exploit more victims.

As Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O’Malley, a national leader on human trafficking, told the media, “It just opens the door for traffickers to use these kids to commit crimes and exploit them even more “. Another prosecutor insightfully pointed out that if traffickers wrote legislation to protect themselves, it would read like SB 1322.

Minors involved in prostitution are clearly victims, but it is far better to have our law enforcement officers arrest these underage prostitutes and keep them away from pimps in detention than to have them prostitute themselves. That would only deepen their victimization and make law enforcement powerless to stop the cycle of sexual abuse. The bill, SB 1322, is not only misguided, its consequences are immoral.

On the other hand, because the bill was passed under Democratic leadership, the pro-Democratic leftist mainstream media naturally defended it, such as NBC, which sanitized public opinion by reporting on the claims of the sponsoring Democratic legislator (Holly J Mitchell).

Democratic Rep. Holly J Mitchell: That’s true – the law does say that if a minor is caught in this situation, he or she will not be treated as a criminal. But state Democrats say the distinction is necessary so that kids aren’t blamed or punished for their situation. Instead, they are to be treated as victims and can be placed by the Department of Social Services in a safe environment that keeps them out of the criminal justice system and with the possibility of getting off the streets and being forced into prostitution again.

California AB 329: Inducing and Encouraging Adolescents and Children to Change Sex

Puberty usually occurs between the ages of 10-16, but gender identity Education in California begins in kindergarten. California’s deviant sexuality education teaches children from kindergarten that there are multiple genders in addition to male and female biological genders, such as genderless, bi-sexual, biological and psychological genders, and so on.

AB 329, deviant sex education and the induction of school children into sex change, has been implemented in California public schools. Parents of underage children between the ages of 13 and 18 are not allowed to see their children’s medical records without their children’s permission; children are taught to conceal their pregnancies and abortions, take sex hormone drugs, and administer transgender injections in school, all without their parents’ prior knowledge.

Lilly Curran (second from right), 11, is transgender in Texas. Photo: GETTY IMAGES

On May 8, 2019, the California Department of Education (CDE) adopted a controversial new sex education curriculum under the California Healthy Youth Act (AB329), which went into effect in 2015, to overhaul the previous The California Department of Education, under the California Healthy Youth Act (AB329), passed a controversial new sex education curriculum that would overhaul sex education by introducing the concept of “sexual orientation” into kindergarten and providing young people with perverse and obscene sex education materials.

California allows kindergarten through 12th grade (K-12) schools to provide comprehensive sex education to students, encouraging youth to identify with, express, experience, and even change their gender from their biological sex. If a child is taught to be influenced to change gender, the school health center counselor will refer the student to a doctor or Planned Parenthood worker; and the student does not need parental consent to seek “sexual health” help at school, including medication and sexual experiences, and the counselor can contact the doctor without telling the parents.

According to Ed Source and Church Militant, under AB 329, California public schools will teach gender identity from kindergarten through third grade; sexual feelings, including masturbation, in grades 4-6; consent to sex and sexual abuse in grades 7-8; and contraception, including advice for LGBTQ students, in grades 9-12. In addition, it would allow students who want to have an abortion, sex change, or be tested for sexually transmitted diseases to do so directly through the school, without parental notification or consent.

Brenda Lebsack, a school board member of Orange Unified School District, said, “Gender cool kids, fluid people, transgender people, unisex people and many more different genders for people to choose from, to correspond to their own feelings. They can choose what they feel. Many parents are having a hard time accepting the idea of “male and female as they wish”.

Rebecca Friedrichs, founder of Kids & Country, an organization of parents, teachers, and students dedicated to restoring traditional educational curriculum and Culture, says the teachers’ union is the root of the problem, not the teachers. The teachers’ unions and their left-wing allies, including Planned Parenthood, the American Civil Liberties Union, the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Kinsey Institute, are in partnership with each other. She added that the teachers’ union has used anti-bullying as an excuse to quietly bring issues such as gender diversity and gender fluidity into education.

Following the release of the previous curriculum, many parents protested that the new curriculum was part of the LGBTQ “agenda” and confused the gender identity of California’s schoolchildren.

Many parents protested that California’s new AB 329 curriculum had become part of the LGBTQ agenda and confused the gender identity of schoolchildren. Photo: Associated Press

California AB2218: Providing Transgender Medical Coverage for Minors

The California Senate Health Committee passed a Transgender Wellness and Equity Fund (AB2218) bill on August 10, 2020, which was sent to the House of Representatives in June, allowing the government to use tax dollars to The bill, which allows the government to use tax dollars to help minors “change their sex”, was voted on and passed by the Senate in late August.

According to Breitbart, the “Transgender Wellness and Equity Fund” was introduced by Democratic State Representative Miguel Santiago (D-San Diego) and would allocate $15 million ($440 million) to hospitals, clinics and other services that provide transgender treatment to transgender people. The proposal is for hospitals, clinics, and other services that provide gender reassignment programs for transgender people, including minors, to allocate $15 million (approximately $400 million) to provide gender reassignment programs for transgender people.

The program includes the provision of puberty blockers, transgender hormones and mastectomies for minors and transgender hormones and sex reassignment surgery for adults. The bill passed the House 59-13 on June 10 and the California Senate Health Committee 7-1 on June 10, and will go to the Senate for a final vote at the end of August.

However, the bill, which is a “personal needs” medical treatment for sex reassignment surgery, will be paid for by the state taxpayers, which has already led to public discontent, and the bill also includes minors, who can undergo the procedure without the consent of their guardians.

First of all, teenagers and children are not fully mature in their thinking and often behave irrationally during their rebellious teenage years, so how can we tell if they really have gender identity disorder? What if they regret after undergoing surgery or hormone treatment? There are also cases that show that some children think they have gender identity disorder during puberty, but suddenly change back after puberty. Second, the damage caused by such surgery and hormones is completely irreversible.

Bruce Jenner, the 1976 Summer Olympics men’s decathlon champion, began hormone replacement therapy years ago, and was photographed on the cover of Vanity Fair magazine as Caitlyn Jenner, a transgender woman. Photo: The Daily Beast

Dr. James Dobson, director of the Family Research Institute, said the bill is like “sterilizing” children because it has been medically proven that giving them puberty blockers, which prevent them from going through puberty, can lead to permanent infertility. If they regret it, they will never be able to have children again.

In addition, the bill funds double mastectomies, genital mutilations and individual reconstructive surgery for girls, which can be brutal for children under the age of 18.

We don’t even need a medical degree to feel that this is immoral for both children and adults, and it’s hard to believe that the government would fund something so evil,” said Dr. James Dobson. Transgender people need care and tolerance, not drugs or devastating surgery, especially for kids in elementary school,” said Dobson.

Jonathan Keller (D-Calif.), president of the California Family Council, also said, “Our senators seem to be ignorant of the effects of hormones causing gender dysphoria in adolescents, “You don’t have to be a doctor to know that hormones are likely to cause lifelong sterility in children who are not experiencing puberty “.

Hormones (hormones) cause gender splitting, deformities, and infertility in adolescents.

Endocrinologist Michael Laidlaw, who has publicly advocated on more than one occasion for the irreversible harm caused by gender transition drugs in preteens, and whose findings have been certified by Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, says, “In addition to causing health problems in children or adolescents, hormones can cause sterility… These children, after treatment These children will not have sperm or eggs after treatment, which is tantamount to having their tubes tied”.

Whatever the purpose, it is highly unethical to provide such transgender medical services to physically and psychologically immature minors, perhaps in the name of gender affirmative action by the left to achieve population reduction.