At the 5th China-International Organ Donation Conference held by the Communist Party of China (CPC) from December 18-20, 2020, Wang He Sheng, deputy director of the National health and Wellness Commission, said that despite the impact of the Epidemic, the number of organ transplants on the mainland had reached 16,307 by the end of November, and the annual number of organ transplants had secured the second place in the world.
Leaving aside the veracity of these figures (all indications are that the actual number is much larger), there is one crucial thing that Wang He Sheng did not say – where do the transplanted organs come from?
For a long Time, the CCP has refused to release detailed data on organ transplants in China and refused to allow international third parties to enter the country for independent investigations, making organ transplants a “black zone. At the same time, the CCP has used its state power to concoct data and fabricate materials to fool the public and the international community. For example, in 2020, the CCP invited Zhang Yimou to direct the film “The Road to Transplantation”, which is supposedly “a true account of five years of organ donation and transplantation in China”.
However, 2020 did at least three things that poked holes in the CCP’s big lie – “Chinese citizens donate organs voluntarily” – and allowed the massive live organ harvesting to slip through the cracks The first event: the internal verification report came to light.
First: Internal Verification Report Reveals Seven Deadly Sins of CCP Organ Transplantation
First, a little background. In 2011, under international pressure, the Chinese Communist Party launched and promoted the so-called “China Computerized Organ Allocation and Sharing System” (COTRS) and began to set up human organ procurement organizations (OPOs) in Chinese hospitals, mainly composed of transplant surgeons, neurosurgeons, intensivists and nurses. In 2014, the COTRS system was implemented in 165 hospitals qualified for organ transplantation in China, and it was announced that the use of organs from convicted criminals under sentence of death as a donor source would be completely discontinued on January 1, 2015, making organ donation the “sole” source for organ transplantation.
The COTRS system is said to consist of four steps: 1) the Red Cross is responsible for organ donation; 2) organ acquisition can only be done by the OPO office set up by the recipient hospital; 3) organ distribution is done by the COTRS system without human intervention; and 4) the recipient hospital (or transplant hospital) is responsible for organ transplantation. However, the two most critical parts of this system in the CCP, OPO acquisition of organs and COTRS allocation of organs, are not open to public data.
On July 5, 2020, an internal document entitled “Data Verification Report of China’s Human Organ Allocation and Sharing Computer System (Zhejiang Province)” was revealed. The document disclosed problems in the allocation and sharing of donated organs in medical institutions in Zhejiang Province between January 1, 2015 and April 13, 2018, with a total of twenty-one problems in eight major categories. The seven most serious problems in the document divulge some of the evils and hidden secrets in organ transplantation in the CCP.
One, the source of transplanted organs is unknown. The report disclosed that liver and kidney transplanted in Zhejiang Province from unknown sources accounted for 7.82% and 4.51% of the illegally sourced organs nationwide. According to the regulations of the CPC Health Planning Commission, “organs not entered into COTRS allocation and organs obtained without COTRS allocation will be treated as illegally sourced organs.”
Second, transplantation before allocation: alleged manipulation of organ flow. Manipulation of organ flow implies that organs are selectively and purposefully directed to specific recipients.
Third, “special case registration” is too high: suspected of manipulating the flow of organs. The “special circumstances registry” applies only to the allocation of organs outside the organ allocation system to prevent waste of organs in the event of force majeure circumstances. The report indicates that the proportion of “special circumstances registry” is too high, indicating that there may be abuse of the special circumstances registry by hospital OPOs, which may lead to artificial manipulation of the flow of organs.
Fourth, the hospital-level OPOs altered donor data one hour before allocation. The report does not provide any explanation or justification for this. Some commentators have argued that the tampering with donor data 1 hour before allocation – a mess in itself – implies that human organs are most likely not voluntarily donated and that hospital OPOs may be covering up the true source of transplanted organs.
Fifth, transplant hospitals change waitlist data 1 hour before allocation. One hour before the allocation of transplant hospitals, the data of liver and kidney transplant waiters was massively changed in 3 digits, a phenomenon that triggered suspicions that the transplant hospitals were finding donors with shorter waiting times in hidden organ banks outside the COTRS allocation system?
Sixth, the temporary addition of waiters to the waiting list and access to allocated organs is suspected of artificially manipulating the flow of organs.
Seventh, liver and kidney organs were abandoned at high frequencies and their destination was unknown. In the verification report, one tenth of the liver organs allocated to the First Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine were abandoned and their destination is unknown.
In short, the many problems revealed in the COTRS Zhejiang verification report reveal that outside the CCP’s COTRS system, there is a much larger underground human organ transplant system that is able to defy investigation by the CCP’s judicial, health and other government departments – able to quickly match patient demand and even “kill on demand. This is what the international community has been accusing the CCP of for years. (Note 1)
In addition, the above analysis is supported here by a statement made by Ye Qi, a professor of organ transplantation at Zhongnan Hospital, at the 2014 Hangzhou Organ Transplant Conference. He said that about 70% of hospitals are not interested in organ transplants from post-mortem donations and have a negative attitude because they prefer “living” transplants with high success rates.
The second incident: several doctors in Anhui illegally removed organs from 11 cadavers
In late 2020, the Bengbu Intermediate Court in Anhui Province ruled in a final case of illegal organ harvesting from cadavers. The court found that the livers and kidneys of 11 deceased people had been illegally and unauthorizedly removed, and six defendants were sentenced to prison terms ranging from two years and four months to ten months for the crime of intentional destruction of a corpse.
The court found that the defendants violated the Regulations on Human Organ Transplantation by not having Red Cross personnel present to supervise and witness the process of human organ donation; they were not authorized to donate human organs across regions and did not have their spouses, adult children, Parents In the absence of the spouse, adult children and parents’ signatures, 11 cases of cadaveric organ removal were performed in Huaiyuan County against the wishes of the deceased or the wishes of their close relatives.
Among the six defendants, four doctors were involved: Huang Xinli, chief physician of Nanjing Gulou Hospital; Lu Sen, chief physician of Jiangsu Provincial People’s Hospital; Yang Suxun, former director of ICU of Huaiyuan County People’s Hospital in Anhui Province; and Wang Hailiang, a doctor of Huabei Mining General Hospital. Among them, Huang Xinli and Lu Sen were OPO (Organ Procurement Organization) staff at their hospitals, and Wang Hailiang was an OPO liaison.
The court noted that the human organ allocation and sharing computer system, which has been mandatory nationwide since September 2013, “automatically allocates” organs based on medical needs. However, Huang Xinli and others illegally removed human organs from deceased persons in the name of organ donation and under the lure of “state compensation,” and “whitewashed” the illegally obtained human organs by means of transplantation before allocation, falsifying and altering medical data, and manipulating the flow of human organs into the system. The hospital’s official website describes Huang Xinhua’s work as a “new” hospital.
According to the hospital’s official website, Huang Xinli is a high-level talent of Jiangsu Province’s “Six Talent Summits” and a member of the Organ Donation and Management Group of the Jiangsu Provincial Medical Association’s Organ Transplantation Branch. In January 2018, Huang Xinli was transferred from the Hepatobiliary Center of Jiangsu Provincial People’s Hospital to Nanjing Gulou Hospital through “Talent Introduction”. Huang worked with Lu Sen when he was working at Jiangsu Provincial People’s Hospital. Lu Sen also has a doctorate degree. (Note 2 and 3)
The Third Thing: The “Vertical Chain of Evidence” of the CCP’s Live Organ Harvesting Revealed by Chen Jingyu’s Lung Transplant Supply Chain
On March 1, 2020, the Chinese Communist Party claimed to have successfully performed the world’s first double lung transplant for a patient with pneumonia in Wuhan. The lead surgeon, Chen Jingyu, is known as “the first person to perform a lung transplant in China”. Over the years, Chen alone has performed 70 percent or more of all transplants in China.
On March 24, 2020, a major article was published under the byline “Zhaori” – “Uncovering the ‘Vertical Chain of Evidence’ of Live Organ Harvesting in the Chinese Communist Party “. The article “provides a more accurate perspective on the operation of the entire transplant industry chain” through the “lung transplant chain” with Chen Jingyu as a witness.
First, it is well known that the cold ischemia of the donor lung (i.e., the period from the time the organ is cut down and immediately cold perfused to the start of the post-transplant blood supply) is very short, typically 8 to 12 hours. However, the paper presented by Jing-Yu Chen to the 26th International Congress on Organ Transplantation in Hong Kong in 2016 showed that “100 cases of lung excision and transplantation” had a very short cold ischemia time of less than 3 hours. Common sense tells us that if the lungs are taken off-site + transport time, it is difficult to control the time within 3 hours, unless the lungs are taken on-site (live) for transplantation.
Second, in the official information and Chen’s own microblog, the organs for lung transplantation are almost always from “brain dead” donors. “Brain death” refers to a patient’s ability to rely on a ventilator to maintain breathing and heartbeat for a period of time after total brain function has been lost and voluntary breathing has ceased. The medical community has proposed the criterion of “brain death” to distinguish it from the traditional criterion of “respiratory and cardiac arrest”. In addition, there is also the criterion of “cardiac and cerebral death”, which means that there is no breathing and the heartbeat has stopped, and the patient is dead in any sense.
However, in the standard manual “Chinese Lung Transplant Donor Criteria and Transfer Guidelines” (hereinafter referred to as “Guidelines”), which was authored by Chen Jingyu, the term “brain death” is not used, but rather the term “cardiac and cerebral death” is used. “Since 2015, citizen heart and brain dead organ donor donors have become the only source of donor lungs for organ transplantation in China.” Why did the Guidelines deliberately avoid using the term “brain-dead donors” directly? One important reason is that, at the legal level, the criterion of “brain death” has not yet been confirmed by Chinese legislation. In other words, Chinese law does not recognize that a “brain dead” person is dead. Chinese law still uses a “composite criterion” consisting of spontaneous respiratory arrest, cessation of heartbeat, and cessation of pupillary reflexes. This leads to the shocking conclusion that the use of “brain-dead donors” for organ transplants is illegal in China!
Third, the Guidelines’ “Donor Lung Selection Criteria” indicate that “brain-dead donors” in the normal sense are not necessarily suitable for lung transplantation because brain-dead donors who have suffered traumatic brain injury or who have failed to receive serious medical treatment usually have a variety of lung injuries or pneumonia, including pulmonary edema, pulmonary solids, and infections. This is one of the reasons why the number of lung transplants is so low. Jing-Yu Chen has stated on several occasions that there is a shortage of donor lungs.
However, something bizarre happened quickly: from 2017, the number of lung transplants performed by Chen Jing Yu doubled from more than 100 cases/year to more than 200 cases/year, propelling China to the number one position in the world in terms of lung transplants. By the end of 2018, Chen had declared that there was “no shortage of donors”. What happened to solve the worldwide shortage of donor lungs within two years? Excluding the normal scenario of “brain death,” what other scenario could there be to obtain a healthy, functioning, living lung with continued breathing and heartbeat?
Fourth, at the end of 2017, the South Korean documentary “TV Chosun” produced and broadcast a feature film “Kill to Live” based on a survey of 20,000 South Koreans who had their organs transplanted in mainland China. In the documentary, Wang Lijun’s invention of the “primary brainstem injury impactor” device was shown to the public. “TV North Korea found that the device was used to prepare organ donors for use in Chinese Communist hospitals.
The “Primary Brainstem Injury Impactor”, which was approved in 2012 with patent number CN 202376254 U, is able to precisely create brainstem death without damaging other brain tissues. By simulating the scene of lung extraction through an imaginary test, one would see the victim being placed on the device, his head being fixed, and then the metal ball being pushed by a huge impact force to precisely strike the skull, creating instant brainstem death and immediate cessation of breathing and heartbeat; at the same time, the person is put on a ventilator to maintain breathing and blood circulation; the rest of the brain immediately falls into a deep coma, the cushion dissipates the impact function, and brain tissue The rest of the brain immediately falls into a deep coma, the cushion dissipates the impact function, the brain tissue is not damaged in a large area, and no lung damage is caused.
In this way, in addition to the normal “total brain death” and “vegetative state”, the CCP has created a new type of “brain stem death”, which is only used for live organ harvesting. The CCP’s “efficient mechanization” of live organ harvesting has also given rise to “brain death” centers. The fact that “brain death” centers were set up in various places was revealed in July 2015 by transplant doctors at the First Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, where Huang Jiefu is the honorary director of the transplant center. Prior to the suspension of the use of death row inmates, the CCP had set up “brain death centers” throughout the country to ensure the availability of live donors. (Notes 4, 5, 6)
It is clear that the CCP’s “brain death” is not “brain death” as defined by the international medical community, but merely murder under the guise of it. If the Nazis were the devil, then the Chinese Communist Party’s crime of “live extraction” is beyond even the devil’s reach. The devil only creates death, but the CCP creates a precise anti-human state of “non-Life and non-death, both life and death” in the transient gap between life and death, and creates a huge money empire based on it (organ transplantation in China is a super-profitable industry).
Conclusion
The illegal harvesting of 11 cadaveric organs by several doctors in Anhui Province partly confirms the problems listed in the “Verification Report on China’s Human Organ Allocation and Sharing Computer System (Zhejiang Province)”; and the verification report of Zhejiang Province reveals a hidden human organ bank on the mainland; this hidden human organ bank is also used by Zhaori through This hidden human organ bank was locked by the “vertical chain of evidence” presented by Zhaori through the analysis of the “supply chain” required for Chen Jingyu’s lung transplant; thus, there is no escape from the crime of “mass organ harvesting by the Chinese Communist Party”.
Recent Comments