Hong Kong‘s new Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor (2nd R) leads Hong Kong government officials as she takes the oath of office before Communist Party President Xi Jinping (1st R) at the Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Centre on July 1, 2017.
Before the opening of the two sessions of the Communist Party of China (CPC), 47 people who had participated in the pro-democracy primaries in Hong Kong were arrested in a mass arrest; as soon as the sessions opened, the CPC announced that it would revise Hong Kong’s electoral system. Subsequently, a Chinese scholar wrote an article claiming that he would escalate the demands on the pro-establishment camp in Hong Kong, and that the Central Government does not need “loyal losers”. Some commentators have pointed out that after the CCP has completely trampled on the democrats, the “three types of people” in Hong Kong may become the new target of the CCP’s rectification.
According to Taiwan‘s Central News Agency, during the Communist Party’s two sessions, Tian Feilong, director of the National Association of Hong Kong and Macau Studies, published a political article focusing on “patriots ruling Hong Kong,” claiming that the introduction of a new Hong Kong election law in 2021 will be a “constitutional moment” and that Beijing is giving Hong Kong While Beijing will give more seats to Hong Kong’s pro-establishment camp, its demands on the pro-establishment camp will also be upgraded, and if they do not do a good job, they will have to step down, because the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China needs “not rubber stamps or loyal losers”, but “virtuous patriots”. The article also shouted at the moderates in the pan-democratic camp in Hong Kong, urging them to cut themselves off from the “radicals” and asking them to “work hard to become patriots”.
After the article was published, it soon attracted widespread attention from Hong Kong public opinion. According to some sources, the Hong Kong pro-establishment faction has already started to discuss who the party considers to be the “loyal losers” in their cell phone groups.
In an article written by veteran Hong Kong commentator Lau Siu-leung, it was pointed out that the Communist Party has an “unconditional and absolute” nature of struggle, but among the many contradictions, those in power in the Communist Party will first seize the “main contradiction” to fight. Before the enactment of the Hong Kong version of the National Security Law, the conflict between the opposition’s fight for genuine universal suffrage and the Chinese Communist Party‘s control over Hong Kong was the “main conflict” in Hong Kong.
According to the article, the pan-democratic organizations in Hong Kong have been disbanded, and pro-democracy activists are either in exile or arrested and imprisoned. After Hong Kong Reset, the CCP has drastically reduced the political space of the opposition from the institutional point of view, so that the “main contradiction” in the eyes of the CCP authorities has been removed. However, according to the Communist Party’s thinking, after winning the struggle against the main contradiction, the problem will not end there, and the CCP will inevitably target three other political forces in Hong Kong, turning the “secondary contradiction” of the past into the main contradiction for the future struggle. The three new targets of the struggle are: the Hong Kong pro-establishment camp, the Hong Kong government officials (the “AO Party”), and the Hong Kong business sector.
The article further analyzes that since the handover of Hong Kong’s sovereignty to the Chinese Communist government in 1997, the AO Party, represented by Anson Chan, has been “watched” by the Chinese Communist Party, but because this group numbers in the hundreds and is responsible for However, because this group has hundreds of members and is responsible for all aspects of the Hong Kong government’s operations, the CCP has not dared to act rashly, but has taken some actions to weaken the power of the AO Party, such as publicly criticizing Anson Chan and establishing the accountability system for senior officials.
According to the article, although the Hong Kong pro-establishment camp has sufficient political resources, they are only a group of people whose Education has become a laughing stock and who have no political discourse skills. They have now become “loyal waste” in the mouth of the Chinese Communist Party’s hawkish think tank. As for the business sector in Hong Kong, it is just “going through the motions to eat political free lunch, basically even the level of professional politicians also lack, the Liaison Office of the United Nations blow chicken, on the hand-raising machine, rubber stamp.”
Hong Kong columnist Tao Jie also wrote an article ridiculing the Chinese Communist Party threatened not to “loyal waste”, which is its allegation that “political officials AO party is the largest anti-China political party,” after another “thunderbolt This is another “thunderbolt” after the allegation that “the AO Party is the biggest anti-China political party”, which made the “patriots” in Hong Kong look at each other and start to discuss who is a “loyal loser”. It is not yet known when the Chinese Communist Party will set up a hotline for reporting “loyal losers” in addition to the “AO Anti-China Party members” hotline.
Recent Comments