The U.S.-Tsunami war, the network world, the global civil society can comment, each from the perspective of the interests of which one hopes to win.
Netizens are not the government, if Hong Kong people want Trump to win, it is not the same as “political betting”. If the world’s only Hong Kong emerged one million support for Trump march, demonstrators displaying American flags and hundreds of portraits of Trump, and some women in tears shouting that Trump is their heart brother Zhang Guorong, this scene, in English, is more Awkward.
Most Hong Kong people who support Trump are only concerned about the trilateral relationship between the United States, China and Hong Kong. However, it can also be stated at another high level: not “supporting Trump”, but just academically, scientifically, supremely that “Biden is more unfit to be president than Trump”.
The reason can have nothing to do with politics: Trump is more energetic than Biden, and Trump has the same charismatic personality as the Monkey King, the protagonist of “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest” and the “King of Thieves”; Biden has the same weak character image.
It is more likely that: I hope Trump wins, not a Jack Nicholson fanatic, Trump is just a totem, the Trump team is more representative of Western civilization since the Renaissance and the original values of the U.S. Constitution in Washington.
On Biden’s side: What are the signals from the “Gone with the Wind” movie, the censorship of the mainstream media based on subjective preferences, the “Black Lives Matter” and the establishment of a whistleblower hotline for Trump supporters, and the so-called McCarthyism that such people have been denouncing for decades, all of which represent that kind of “liberal” reactionary trend?
The people of the rest of the world are not obligated to accept the moral standards of the American White Left, because world opinion and the brains of anyone outside the East or West coasts of the United States are not the colonies of Twitter, Google, Hollywood, CNN, or Harvard-Berkeley.
As for Trump or Biden, who is more anti-communist? In the eyes of the wise, it is a low-level question. It’s like asking a monk: There are two actresses in front of you, one is Anne Hathaway, the other is seventy-year-old Charlotte Rampling. The monk and I both said, “I choose Charlotte Rampling, because what you think is young and beautiful, in the eyes of the monk is a smelly skin.
Because what you see as young and beautiful in your eyes is after all a smelly skin in the eyes of the high priest; choosing Charlotte Rampling is Preferring her connotation and flavor. There are different levels, so you don’t have to force it.
In other words, if you want Trump to win, you can support Pence much more than Hoggett. You can like the American Christian evangelicals represented by Pence, a force represented by Sturgeon, who established many universities in the Republic of China to enlighten the Chinese people, enlighten reason, and introduce the sunshine of civilization. Everything is just a matter of drinking water and thinking of its source.
Therefore, if you hope that Trump will win, the reason does not have to be explained to the left rubber public opinion in the United States, because you judge bye powder its intelligence and insight, will never understand. Just like Fei Zhengqing’s stream, his yearning for Mao Zedong and Yan’an, in Hu Shih’s eyes, is ignorance, but to the American sinologists, as told by Zhu Yuanzhang, the first emperor of Qin, with his intelligence and insight, he also does not understand.
In the eyes of the former, Trump is the manifestation of all superficiality, in the eyes of the latter, flesh and color are not important, values and meaning, how to transcend Trump, is the summer insects can not speak in ice controversy. Indeed, the whole life of an ant does not understand that the world has three dimensions: length, breadth and height. One does not argue with ants about this.
As for the election, Trump’s accusation of systematic cheating by the Democratic Party needs evidence.
During the election, Hong Kong’s political protesters can and do connect with Biden, because they are in politics, politics and PR as much as strategy, try to unite the majority, not only no problem, but necessary.
But as an audience, you can insist on freedom of speech. Of course, it’s one thing to want Trump to win, it’s another to insist after the election that there must be solid evidence to believe that the Democrats systematically cheated and that a foreign power was involved in the development of the voting software to cheat, and that there must be evidence to accept the accusation.
Some netizens in Hong Kong are still unsettled in this regard and are in a state of information confusion. The mainstream media, which has been in the West for a hundred years, is no longer credible due to its ideological obsessions; the alternative media, which supports Trump, has not yet risen to the level of establishing credibility.
Hong Kong netizens rely on intermediaries of the Chinese language Internet media, including those who strongly support Trump, mostly lack news investigation training, and many facts and evidence. Those who are anti-Trump have been a long-time overseas colony of CNN of the New York Times. During that time, foreign powers tried their best to provide provocative rumors and comments, pushing the American-invented Internet technology towards the Orwellian goal of “1984”, taking advantage of the internal turmoil in the United States, but no time was wasted.
In Hong Kong, a city with a long history of stock trading and horse racing, the mind is permanently dominated by the mythology of “betting on the winning side,” “cutting off positions,” and “betting on treasure. In this century-old magic game, even Western intellectuals, not to mention Hong Kong, which grew up with colonial genes, were confused and bewildered. In such a chaotic world, to insist on very clear and independent thinking is also a serious choice between being a human being, an animal, and a slave.
Recent Comments