During the two sessions of the National People’s Congress, Zhao Chao, a delegate to the Communist Party of China National People’s Congress, suggested raising the admission rate of general high schools to more than 80 percent. Photo is a file photo.
During the National People’s Congress of the Communist Party of China, Zhao Chao, a delegate to the National People’s Congress of the Communist Party of China, suggested raising the admission rate of general high schools to more than 80 percent. But most mainland netizens do not seem to approve of this proposal.
According to the 21st Century Business Herald, in 2019, the number of junior high school graduates in China will be more than 14.54 million, and the number of high school enrollment will be about 8.4 million, with a national junior high school to high school ratio of 57.73 percent.
Zhao Chao said that in 2020, although the proportion of junior high school graduates around the country has increased, it still cannot meet the public’s “strong desire” for high school enrollment expansion, and “middle school anxiety” has become a popular Education topic in recent years.
He said, “Junior high school children are young, plasticity is great. Prematurely large proportion of diversion will make some children with development potential lose the opportunity to high school retrograde, but also will cause a great waste of social human resources.”
In Zhao Chao’s opinion, the admission rate of High School Entrance Examination has exceeded 80%, and even if they are not satisfied with the results, students can still repeat. However, if they fail to pass the high school entrance examination, students can only face the two choices of secondary school and employment. Therefore, he suggested that the admission rate of general high school should be increased to more than 80%.
In contrast to some odd proposals that appeared in the previous days, some Weibo users said, “Finally, I see a ‘yang proposal’.” Others expressed support saying, “It’s long overdue for universal twelve-year compulsory education.” “Not being able to go to general high school after middle school would really be a waste of a lot of talent, and could be just a little short of changing the fate of a person or a Family.” “Support, there are many students really high school retrograde.”
However, most netizens are still opposed, criticizing Zhao Chao for “opening his mouth”.
Some said, “Do not like to study also have a way out, why bother?”
“Have you ever been a teacher, you know there are people who really do not understand?” “rural teachers want to say, first make compulsory education, I teach students poor foundation to elementary school content did not learn to read junior high school, many Chinese characters can not write, ‘people into’ can not distinguish, ‘has been their own’ can not distinguish. “
“Not everyone is good at book knowledge, can not focus on vocational and technical skills training? Mentioned 100%, can’t learn in or can’t learn in, to teach according to the material, understand?”
Some people also suggested that the main problem at present is the quality of vocational education is not.
“Deep Sea…”: I can only say that vocational education is too watery, secondary school and high school is equal to nothing, simply can not teach the real technical personnel.
“Wei…”: Vocational education has been shouting for many years, but it has not seen any development.
“KiK⋯”: It is strongly recommended that vocational education be built at a high level, otherwise it will only ruin these young people.
“Wine…”: Vocational education is really water, to put it bluntly, it’s a money spinner.
There are also netizens who say that such a proposal to take care of the front and not the back will lead to other related problems.
Some people say, “That college students are not ‘worth it’.” A bunch of muddled college students out, low not high not. Do technical work without stamina no technology, do research without knowledge no wisdom. A big pile of negative assets.”
“The first line of work who still do?” “It is not necessary. Waste three years, it is better to learn some technology. Now the education bubble is obvious, social construction needs more skilled people, not 5 years of college books! Raising the wages of skilled workers’ jobs and fostering technical schools is much more useful than a 12-year consistent system!”
Recent Comments