The Gateway Pundit exclusively reported Monday that international financial interests and the global scientific establishment, never wanted to disclose the true source of the Chinese Communist virus, despite suspicions that the virus was lab-created early in the outbreak.
There is now evidence that some within the U.S. government acted in coordination with specific members of the U.S. scientific community, no doubt with the help of the international business community and media, to protect the CCP from any liability, with the ultimate goal of protecting their own interests.
On January 13, 2020, there were already comments on the internet that the CCP virus was created in the labs of the CCP and that U.S. scientists may have helped the CCP scientists gain the knowledge to create the virus, specifically, in the lab of Dr. Zhengli Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virus at the University of North Carolina (the University of North Carolina), Barry Dr. Ralph Baric of the University of North Carolina created the CCP virus with the assistance of Dr. Ralph Baric.
On January 26, 2020, Bill Gertz, a respected investigative journalist and defense expert, wrote in a Washington Times article that “the deadly Chinese Communist virus spreading around the world may have originated in a laboratory somewhere in Wuhan associated with a secret Chinese Communist biological weapons program.”
On February 3, 2020, Kelvin Droegemeier, a product of the Republican establishment and then director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), sent a letter to Dr. Marcia McNutt, president of the National Academy of Sciences (NASEM). Marcia McNutt, requesting in the letter, “that the National Academy of Sciences promptly examine information and identify data requirements that will help determine the origin of the CCP virus, particularly from an evolutionary/structural biology perspective.”
Based on the findings given by the scientists enlisted to develop a response to the White House request, a complete exoneration of the CCP was doomed.
The eight scientists are.
Kristian G. Andersen of Scripps Research, the Scripps Research Institute based in San Diego, California, whose research spans basic Medicine, chemistry, and biology.
Ralph Baric of the UNC School of Public health, which was ranked No. 1 in public health in the United States in 2020.
Trevor Bedford of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Institute (FHCI).
Aravinda Chakravarti, a geneticist at the State University of New York School of Medicine (SUNY).
Peter Daszak, a zoologist with the EcoHealth Alliance, who has visited China several times and appeared on Global TV.
Gigi K. Gronvall of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Tom Inglesby of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.
Stanley Perlman, a microbiologist at the University of Iowa.
In a letter to the White House, the National Academy of Sciences cited an article from the Wuhan Institute of Virology that said the outbreak “began in a local seafood market,” clearly supporting the Communist government’s contention that the pandemic was a natural transmission from animals to humans.
In addition, the three presidents of the National Academy of Sciences recommended that the United States continue to work closely with China, particularly the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Most of the scientists who appear in the National Academy of Sciences response above have a long history of working with the CCP or later strongly support the theory that the CCP virus originated naturally.
Based on the email correspondence between the National Academy of Sciences and the consulting scientists, it seems clear that the scientists were working to support the theory that the virus was naturally occurring and to eliminate or downplay any suggestion that the CCP virus viruses were engineered with unique human binding properties and could mutate toward higher infectivity.
These scientists above then embarked on their own public relations campaign to support the theory that the CCP virus virus was naturally transmitted from animals to humans.
In an article published in the British medical journal The Lancet on March 7, 2020, zoologist Dazak and microbiologist Pullman stated, “Together, we strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that the CCP virus is not of natural origin.
On March 17, 2020, the Scripps Research Institute’s Anderson, a senior author, stated in his article that the CCP virus “is not a deliberately manipulated virus.
Hopkins’ Grunwald team wrote an article criticizing Chinese whistleblower Dr. Yan Limeng for presenting evidence that the CCP virus was produced in a laboratory.
It is also known that Barrick of the School of Global Public Health has a long history of collaboration with “Batgirl” Shi Zhengli of the Wuhan Institute of Virus, including conducting experiments involving high-risk “gain-of-function” research.
According to the Daily Signal, the only U.S. representative on the World Health Organization team investigating the source of the Chinese Communist virus, zoologist Datsak, is also a close associate of Shi Zhengli and a key figure in directing U.S. taxpayer funds to the Wuhan Virus Institute.
Datsak even organized a public relations campaign to portray the hypothesis of a lab leak as a “conspiracy” before any thorough investigation was conducted. His spokesman later said the campaign was designed to protect the lab’s scientists. The Gateway Pundit suggests that ultimately, perhaps intentionally, the beneficiaries were China, international financial interests and global scientific institutions.
Recent Comments