Recently, it was rumored that the Chinese Communist netizens were brainwashing the unification of Taiwan. Pictured is mainland netizen Li Ziqi. (Photo source: video screenshot)
Recently a number of media kicked out that the Beijing authorities have expanded the training of weblebrities and e-commerce broadcasters to engage in unification warfare brainwashing against Taiwan. Taiwan’s Ki Progressive Party Chairman Chen Yiqi suggested that the “Foreign Power Agents Act” should be passed as soon as possible, which can also balance freedom of speech and prevent malicious infiltration by the Chinese Communist Party. The outside world also believes that how to avoid Taiwan by the Chinese Communist Party deliberately create internal confrontation, has become a major challenge for national security.
According to the Central News Agency, the national security unit pointed out that China has recently adjusted its cognitive warfare against Taiwan, and has instead expanded its training activities for weblebrities and e-commerce broadcasters, and is actively using new media as a propaganda channel to influence various online opinion leaders in an attempt to dominate Taiwan’s online opinion environment and thus conduct unified warfare brainwashing against Taiwan.
Chen Yiqi, chairman of Taiwan’s Ki-jin Party, disclosed that the Beijing authorities have absorbed netizens as opinion leaders who do not talk about politics but speak for the government at critical moments. Although some netizens do not talk about political topics, they quote the interpretation of the Chinese Communist Party’s official media in the process and brainwash through entertainment.
Chen Yiqi said that the Chinese Communist Party is using Taiwanese weblebrities and live broadcasters, which is tantamount to using Taiwanese to disintegrate young people internally or to brainwash them before they develop political sensitivity, but because freedom of speech is involved, the ROC government has no way to prohibit weblebrities and live broadcasters from propagating for the Chinese Communist Party.
He argued that netizens and live broadcasters are long-running groups, and in order to take into account their freedom of expression in Taiwan and prevent malicious infiltration by the CCP, the “Foreign Agents Act” is the best way to prevent the CCP from taking advantage of the loopholes in a democratic society to infiltrate.
Tseng Chien-yuan, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Chinese Academy of Democracy, believes that with the world’s extreme reliance on the Internet, Internet surveillance, infiltration or political propaganda has long been an important part of the CCP’s foreign propaganda strategy.
Tseng pointed out that when Taiwanese people watch mainland news, they are not able to clearly grasp the content of mainland reports, and it is also difficult for mainland propaganda on Taiwan to accurately grasp the language habits and values of Taiwanese people, so even if the CCP invests more manpower and resources, the propaganda effect is limited.
Zeng Jianyuan said that Taiwanese people will not be foolish enough to read only mainland news, and there are no restrictions on the freedom of the Internet, and messages from the mainland and other countries will be viewed at the same Time, so on the Taiwan side, mainland information is only considered a few sources.
According to Tseng, the advantage of freedom of speech is the diversity of information, which allows the people of Taiwan to make their own judgments, especially on major values, without relying on the instructions of the state or the party, and it is easy to form antibodies to inappropriate political propaganda.
Public TV reported that in order to prevent the brainwashing of Taiwan’s United Front by Communist Chinese netizens, DPP legislator Fan Yun suggested that “the Ministry of Digital Development should have to be set up at an accelerated pace to help deal with online speech.”
Wang Zhisheng, secretary general of the Chinese Asia Pacific Elite Exchange Association, also believes that “the government needs to grasp and understand the so-called online golden stream, especially when specific comments are inflammatory, and should strengthen the control of politically antagonistic comments.”
Recently, it was rumored that the Chinese Communist netizens were brainwashing the unification of Taiwan. Pictured is mainland netizen Li Ziqi. (Photo source: video screenshot)
Recently a number of media kicked out that the Beijing authorities have expanded the training of weblebrities and e-commerce broadcasters to engage in unification warfare brainwashing against Taiwan. Taiwan’s Ki Progressive Party Chairman Chen Yiqi suggested that the “Foreign Power Agents Act” should be passed as soon as possible, which can also balance freedom of speech and prevent malicious infiltration by the Chinese Communist Party. The outside world also believes that how to avoid Taiwan by the Chinese Communist Party deliberately create internal confrontation, has become a major challenge for national security.
According to the Central News Agency, the national security unit pointed out that China has recently adjusted its cognitive warfare against Taiwan, and has instead expanded its training activities for weblebrities and e-commerce broadcasters, and is actively using new media as a propaganda channel to influence various online opinion leaders in an attempt to dominate Taiwan’s online opinion environment and thus conduct unified warfare brainwashing against Taiwan.
Chen Yiqi, chairman of Taiwan’s Ki-jin Party, disclosed that the Beijing authorities have absorbed netizens as opinion leaders who do not talk about politics but speak for the government at critical moments. Although some netizens do not talk about political topics, they quote the interpretation of the Chinese Communist Party’s official media in the process and brainwash through entertainment.
Chen Yiqi said that the Chinese Communist Party is using Taiwanese weblebrities and live broadcasters, which is tantamount to using Taiwanese to disintegrate young people internally or to brainwash them before they develop political sensitivity, but because freedom of speech is involved, the ROC government has no way to prohibit weblebrities and live broadcasters from propagating for the Chinese Communist Party.
He argued that netizens and live broadcasters are long-running groups, and in order to take into account their freedom of expression in Taiwan and prevent malicious infiltration by the CCP, the “Foreign Agents Act” is the best way to prevent the CCP from taking advantage of the loopholes in a democratic society to infiltrate.
Tseng Chien-yuan, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Chinese Academy of Democracy, believes that with the world’s extreme reliance on the Internet, Internet surveillance, infiltration or political propaganda has long been an important part of the CCP’s foreign propaganda strategy.
Tseng pointed out that when Taiwanese people watch mainland news, they are not able to clearly grasp the content of mainland reports, and it is also difficult for mainland propaganda on Taiwan to accurately grasp the language habits and values of Taiwanese people, so even if the CCP invests more manpower and resources, the propaganda effect is limited.
Zeng Jianyuan said that Taiwanese people will not be foolish enough to read only mainland news, and there are no restrictions on the freedom of the Internet, and messages from the mainland and other countries will be viewed at the same time, so on the Taiwan side, mainland information is only considered a few sources.
According to Tseng, the advantage of freedom of speech is the diversity of information, which allows the people of Taiwan to make their own judgments, especially on major values, without relying on the instructions of the state or the party, and it is easy to form antibodies to inappropriate political propaganda.
Public TV reported that in order to prevent the brainwashing of Taiwan’s United Front by Communist Chinese netizens, DPP legislator Fan Yun suggested that “the Ministry of Digital Development should have to be set up at an accelerated pace to help deal with online speech.”
Wang Zhisheng, secretary general of the Chinese Asia Pacific Elite Exchange Association, also believes that “the government needs to grasp and understand the so-called online golden stream, especially when specific comments are inflammatory, and should strengthen the control of politically antagonistic comments.”
Recent Comments