After yesterday’s posting, there are still many followers who disagree with the article. It’s okay to disagree, but some followers are mean to the old pan-democrats and despise Lai Chi-ying‘s attitude.
In the anti-sending movement, there is a “brothers climbing the mountain, their own efforts” purpose, in the middle of the movement, the development of the brave faction and the divergence of the Rei Fei, this is normal, some people take a radical attitude in dealing with things, some people focus on rational, people have different personalities, can not be forced to agree. Most of my friends around me are Woori-Filipinos, and I did not agree with some of the practices of the Yongmu faction at first, but when the enemy was at hand and internal unity was needed, many Woori-Filipinos adopted a tolerant attitude.
Throughout the whole movement, the Woolly Bishops did not back down from the beginning to the end, and some of them even went to the front line. A friend of mine, who emigrated to Australia, came back to Hong Kong and participated in almost every demonstration with his children, and even went to the front line and took tear gas.
The vast majority of the two million people demonstrating peacefully were Ralph Lauren. We saw pan-democratic Legislative Council representatives and party cadres participating in the planning and organizing, and many of them also stood on the front line of the conflict, confronting the police, protecting the people, taking pepper spray themselves, and being injured and bleeding. In the July 21 incident, Lam Cheuk Ting was injured on the front line, as well as Ho Chun Yan, Kwong Chun Yu, etc. They all suffered flesh and blood.
The older generation of the Democratic Party, Szeto Wah and Martin Lee, were the initiators of the democratic movement in Hong Kong, and they fought for democracy at a Time when many young people were not yet born. Without strong convictions and the spirit of sacrifice for the public interest, there is no way to sustain them for decades.
When millions of people participate in a common political movement, you can’t expect everyone to share the same views. If others have different views from you, they are betrayed and treated as enemies. If Hong Kong people can’t even tolerate their own people in their own camp, what kind of democracy can they expect to pursue? Democracy is not a matter of your opinion, democracy is a matter of mutual tolerance.
The more difficult it is, the more unity and mutual understanding is needed. The main reason why I advocate a merger of the three parties is that in the face of the current difficult situation, there needs to be a backbone, a flag, and unified action. The Million Man March, wasn’t it organized by the FDD? One rally and one march, someone has to apply, someone has to organize, someone has to plan, someone has to make on-site arrangements. Can you do it? Do you have enough appeal, do you have the manpower and material resources, do you have enough experience, if not, then why not allow a group to take the leadership responsibility?
There is no more election for the Legislative Council, no more election for the District Councils, no more peaceful demonstrations, no more rallies, so what is left? Some people say they want to go on strike, others say they want to go underground, go underground for what, an armed uprising? If the whole movement is full of defeatist and decentralist ideas, what else can be done? If you want to go on strike, why don’t you organize? If you want to go underground, you can go underground, but you can’t oppose the building of a big station just because you are not a big station.
It is easy to scold people, it is the actual doing that is the hardest. The old pan-democrats have made mistakes, but why can’t you remember how many things they have done? Over the past 20 to 30 years, if the old pan-democrats had not persisted, the bloodline of democracy in Hong Kong would have been broken. The old pan-democrats were present during the June 4, 1989, Article 23, the Occupy Central Movement, and the Anti-Send-China Movement. Chen Jianmin, Dai Yaoting and some of their scholars even entered the Liaison Office of the Central People’s Government and negotiated with the Chinese Communist Party. Chen Jianmin also led some people to the mainland, and was the head of an exchange group? Is everyone’s position wavering, only you are the greatest? Is it also wrong for Chen Jianmin and Dai Yaoting to go to jail and betray the interests of Hong Kong people?
I suggested a merger of the three parties, the three parties may not listen, we can discuss, but some people have already denounced me as an agent of the Chinese Communist Party, I am an agent of the Chinese Communist Party, I eat so much, every day racking my brains to write a thousand words, each piece to get 20 cents pay?
There must be a radical, a middle and a conservative wing within a political movement. The three parties really merged, they build a big station, you can participate, or not, you can also go to build a big station yourself, someone to follow you, that’s fine, but do not take others to build a big station are treated as a treacherous thing, first see how people do, will not build a big station to sell out the interests of Hong Kong people, and then only to speak out, this is the rational attitude.
These reasons are very shallow, but unfortunately some people say that the pole is still not clear. Destruction sometimes starts from within, their own internal confusion of ideas, the pressure comes, divided, the Chinese Communist Party has not done, we ourselves first scattered.
We talk sense, can convince each other the best, if not, each do their own, and then the bottom of the pot to meet.
Recent Comments