The government of the United States questioned the process of reaching a conclusion after the international expert group went to China to study the source of the Epidemic, to which WHO Secretary-General Tan Desai said today that this is an independent study by the experts, stressing that “it is not a WHO investigation, WHO is only in the coordination role”.
The government of the United States questioned the process of experts studying the source of the epidemic, and said that the WHO is only playing a coordinating role. The government’s decision to use the “new” method to investigate the issue was made by the government.
The government’s decision to use the “new” method to investigate the origin of the Chinese Communist Party‘s viral disease (COVID-19) was made at a press conference held in Wuhan on February 9, and the preliminary results of the investigation were published on the origin of the virus, the spread of the seafood market, the role of bats and the “leakage of the virus” by the Wuhan Institute of Virus Research.
In this regard, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said today at the WHO online press conference, regardless of the conclusions of the future summary of the investigation report, these are the independent study of experts.
Tandse explained that only two of the international panel of experts are from WHO, and the other 10 experts are from 10 institutions in different countries. WHO does not guide them on what to do, it is up to the experts to provide an independent report.
He said he had heard repeatedly that this was a WHO study and survey, but “it is not”, stressing that it was not a WHO survey, but an independent study, with WHO only coordinating.
However, WHO has recently taken the initiative to speak out on behalf of the international team of experts, and in early January this year, Tandse expressed his disappointment that some of the experts had been on a flight to China but still had not been granted Chinese visas, saying that he himself was in constant contact with Chinese Communist Party officials to make it clear to China that this task was a priority for WHO and the international team of experts.
U.S. national security adviser Jake Sullivan expressed deep concern Feb. 13 about the way the preliminary results of the international experts’ investigation were released and questioned the process by which the WHO reached its conclusions. He stressed that the findings should be independent and free from Chinese Communist interference or fabrication.
Sullivan said, “This (investigation) report should be independent and the experts’ conclusions should not be subject to interference or falsification by the Chinese Communist government.”
The international panel of experts announced its preliminary findings at a press conference in Wuhan on Feb. 9, including that the South China Seafood Market was only one of the outbreak sites and not the only one; in addition there was no evidence that the virus was present in Wuhan before December 2019.
The day attended the press conference of the WHO expert panel leader Ben Embarek (Peter Ben Embarek) said that the possibility of leakage from the Wuhan virus laboratory is very low, directly indicating that therefore will not be studied again from the direction concerned, and also refers to the Food cold chain is one of the possible ways of transmission of the virus, worthy of further investigation.
As the Chinese Communist Party has long stressed that the virus leak from the Wuhan laboratory is a conspiracy theory, and even said that there are many reports of the virus detected from the cold chain food packaging in China, making the wording of the group of experts is questioned whether it is inclined to the Communist Party’s big foreign propaganda.
Recent Comments