Until the end of 2019, Trump‘s administration report card was very beautiful, whether it was economic, political, or social policies that the Democrats could not win through a normal election – the chief architect of the election-stealing strategy (The Architect), Michael Podhorzer, is known as (The Architect ) fully recognized this reality in 2019 and mobilized all his forces for it, from organization to funding to bills to manpower.
A vast, octopus-like network of election manipulation
Podhoretzer is the assistant to the strategic research chairman of the AFL-CIO, a federation of 55 unions representing 12.5 million members. With more than 20 years of experience in campaign politics and a book touting his campaign skills and accomplishments, “The Victory Lab,” Podhoretzer has established himself as an early leader in the business of political campaigning in the Internet age: data-driven politics.
In the new field of data-driven politics, the only person who can stand alongside Podhoretzer is Dominic “Mr. Key” Cummings, the “Mr. Key” of Britain’s exit from the European Union. But Cummings and Podhoretzer, both pioneers of data-driven politics, have played opposite roles in globalization (the Great Reset): Cummings helped Britain leave the EU by denying globalization, and Podhoretzer helped the Democrats get elected in order to promote the Great Reset.
But what Podholzer did was far more difficult than what Cummings did back then. Cummings’ task was mainly to get real voters in real Life, Podholzer knew that it was far from enough to get real voters in real life, he had to create voters and also decorate these virtual voters as real voters, so the plan was much more elaborate.
The organization Podhoretzer created for the 2020 U.S. election is called the Democratic Defense Coalition, and various secondary organizations are formed underneath it to take various political actions as needed. Although this loose coalition is a temporary aggregation with a limited purpose – to ensure the Democratic Party’s victory in the 2020 election – it has all the mobilization, absorption and integration, driving force, and control mechanisms that an organization should have. The organization has built a huge campaign network, like a giant octopus, reaching out to all corners of American society: uniting more than 150 NGOs and various organizations, including Planned Parenthood, Greenpeace, Indivisible, and Move The most important of these are the regular meetings of the Secretaries of State and Attorneys General of the 37 states, and the at least weekly Zoom meetings of the 22 Democrats and 22 Republicans of the National Commission on Election Integrity. Each meeting sets the immediate course of action and principles, and is responsible for contacting the right people to implement the plan.
After Election Day, the Alliance Defending Democracy monitored every pressure point in real Time to ensure that Trump could not overturn the results. Norm Eisen, a prominent attorney and former Obama administration official, recruited Republicans and Democrats to join the board of the Voter Protection Program. For 78 days, from Nov. 3 to Jan. 20, they laid out a detailed 78-day “coup-proof plan” that The Shadow Campaign History breaks down into five steps: the first step is to win the election; after that comes winning the count, winning the certification, winning the Electoral College, and winning the often pro forma transitional steps. The thrill of election night was also documented in the article. At around 11:00 p.m., when six states announced they had stopped counting votes, Trump won big, and the Democrats were so desperate that hundreds of coalition stalwarts immediately called an emergency Zoom meeting, but Podhoretzer, who had the whole picture in hand, had already planned to flood Election Day with a “blue wave” of mail-in ballots. The “red phantom”, calmly reassured the participants and showed his plan with data. This detail explains why the six swing states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Nevada stopped counting shortly after 11:00 a.m. and resumed counting with the famous “Biden curve” in Michigan. The steady stream of mail-in ballots after Election Day was almost exclusively Biden’s (the blue wave). There have been some people who believe that the six states stopped counting at the same time on whose orders, and after reading this article, it should not be difficult to get an answer, because nine out of ten of the 37 state secretaries of state include those six.
The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign highly recognizes Republican officials such as Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger for their work in this election, but forgets to recognize Michigan’s Democratic Secretary of State, Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson. Ms. Benson was instrumental in thwarting the Republican opposition to Biden’s election by ordering county clerks to “destroy specific election data and software” in Michigan, where fraud was rampant in the 2020 election. She has published a monograph, Secretary of State: Guardians of the Democratic Process (Election Law, Politics, and Theory ), an analysis of the important role of secretaries of state in elections. Through a series of case studies, anecdotes, and interviews with secretaries of state, the book is the first in-depth study of the role of voter registration, enforcement of voting laws and regulations, oversight, and supervision, and is a guide to the secretary of state’s electoral work. Benson’s strong political manipulation and her performance in election certification have made her what some call “Trump’s nemesis.
Big money
The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign confirms that the coalition’s unified anti-Trump front with Silicon Valley and the business community has enabled the Democratic camp to raise unprecedented amounts of money. How much were these funds? According to data released by the Federal Election Commission on Feb. 10: The Democrats raised more than $3.2 billion, four times the amount raised by Trump, and spent it all. Such a huge investment of election funds is indeed enough to feed the election manipulation system from top to bottom during the election, with tens of thousands of people participating nationwide. The article “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign” says that Zuckerberg alone contributed over $300 million in funds. This huge amount is smaller than the figures published by The Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society. on December 17, 2020, the Amistad Project released a report that Zuckerberg funded 10 nonprofits through five foundations to funnel up to 500 million in private funds into the public administration of elections. The report also revealed that this dark money network was created to collect, aggregate and analyze information gathered from third parties that have direct access to voter files in each state, with the goal of encouraging lawlessness (encouraged lawlessness) and influencing U.S. elections and election policies.
An important way to harvest votes is to buy them. With such a large financial back-up, the Democratic Party’s paid social workers can be permanently stationed at various community events, especially nursing homes and communities where low-income people congregate, to train people to buy and harvest votes in various ways. A senior Democratic Party worker in charge of elections in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, who led teams of election fraudsters in all three states and mentored at least 20 Democratic Party workers in New Jersey alone, has opened up about his various techniques and activities in engaging in election fraud in an interview with a New York Post reporter in August 2020. These included helping Michael Rubens Bloomberg (also known as Michael Bloomberg), the 10th richest man in the United States, buy votes for his third term as mayor of New York for about $174 per vote. Bloomberg himself, at the February 26, 2020 Democratic presidential debate in South Carolina, has claimed that he bought 21 seats for Democrats in the 2018 midterm elections, thus giving Nancy Polosi a chance to be speaker.
Key Layouts Involving the Big Picture: the Democratic House Bill 2019-HRR1
The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign recounts that Mike Podhoretzer, founder of the Alliance to Defend Democracy, has been studying why Trump won in 2016 since 2017, and after discovering that it was the betrayal of the union base – manufacturing workers – to the Democratic Party that led to this point, he believes that to win the 2020 election “The first task is to overhaul America’s shaky electoral infrastructure,” and by overhaul, of course, he means paving the way legally.
After Democrats took control of the House in the 2018 midterm elections, a 600-page bill, House Resolution 1 (H.R. 1 Act), was released in January 2019 specifically for “election reform.” Some of the legislation is designed to weaponize campaign finance laws and give Democrats more control over political speech and intimidation of opponents, including two major categories: 1. The bill would require states to vote early and must allow Election Day and online voter registration, thereby undermining the accuracy of the voting rolls. Would allow states to automatically register voters from government databases, including federal benefit recipients. High schools would be designated as voter registration centers, and 16-year-olds would be registered to vote two years in advance.2 The bill requires “no-fault” absentee voting, allowing anyone to vote by mail for any reason.3 It retains “ballot collection” rules. rules. This rule allows paid radicals to prowl the community to boost absentee ballots.
It is particularly puzzling that the Republicans and the Trump campaign did not pay attention to such an important bill that was designed to change the rules of the election. It was not until Nov. 10 after the 2020 election that Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation in Washington and a former FEC member and election law expert, mentioned in an interview with prominent conservative host Mark Levin that The bill was the Democrats’ preparation for vote-harvesting: Before the election, the Democrats and their surrogates filed hundreds of lawsuits – an unprecedented intensity of litigation against election law, all of which sought to eliminate existing absentee and mail-in ballot security measures, such as witness signatures, signature comparisons, and to plunge the election into electoral fraud and vote-harvesting. fraud and vote-harvesting.
After the 2020 U.S. elections, the Democrats have eaten their words and H.R. 1 bill, with additions, would give Congress full authority over future national elections and seek congressional passage at some appropriate time. one America News Network devoted a program on February 3, 2021 to the highlights of the bill’s contents.
- mandatory national online voter registration, with no way to verify voter status
- registration as a voter on voting day
- nationwide harvesting of ballots.
- allowing felons (including murderers and rapists) to vote.
- DC and Puerto Rico becoming states (this is in preparation for Pack Court, which adds two senators to each new state, and the Democrats can add four, and from then on always have a majority in the Senate, and then take the majority of high law justices by nominating leftist justices).
- 16 year olds can register to vote (16 year olds are mentally immature and susceptible to leftist educational demagoguery)
- prohibiting the removal of non-citizens from the voter rolls
- banning voter ID cards and changing the Federal Election Commission from bipartisan control to control by the ruling party
- severe penalties for those who “harass” poll workers and government officials over elections.
- a constitutional amendment that would make it clear that it is no longer the state legislatures that decide elections, but that Congress has broad authority to decide when, where and how elections are held.
The moderator commented that this bill “sanctifies voter fraud” and that if passed, “this bill is the death of democracy.
It should be acknowledged that the Democratic camp’s plan to manipulate the election is indeed very well thought out. Both Trump and the Republican House and Senate are far less prepared for the 2020 election. In the era of data in the election method of major changes, the Republican Party to the traditional campaign to deal with the well-organized data manipulation of the election, can only be admitted. If not seriously re-organize the Republican Party, mobilize the party’s elite to devote their efforts to study and plug various system loopholes, the Republican Party is unlikely to have a chance to win in the future.
Recent Comments