How can we explain Aung San Suu Kyi’s coming to power and joining forces with the “elected government” to suppress the Rohingya minority at the border?
I used an analogy in English in a group of Western friends in Hong Kong: Just imagine that one day China finally allows universal suffrage in Hong Kong and Hong Kong people elect Claudia Mo as Chief Executive and Chief Secretary for Administration Fernando Cheung.
But the two of them, together with the Commissioner of Police, Deng Bingqiang (PK Deng was still around at that Time, and he was working as a part-time employee), sent the military police to raid Chungking Mansions, arresting all the South Asian illegal immigrants inside, lining up all squats in Nathan Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, and shooting at them.
Claudia, wearing a light green dress, white shawl, long hair in a bun, and an egg flower called Frangipani, said in English, which is second only to the former Sir Joseph Tang in terms of pronunciation, “Well, this may be a bit messy in your eyes, I admit there is room for improvement, but only mainstream Public opinion supports us to do so.
Don’t forget that Burma has been a Buddhist country since ancient times.
Why are the so-called Liberals as racist as they are? Aung San Suu Kyi is the perfect case.
Sun Yat-sen and Huang Xing, like Qiu Jin, were among the first Liberals in China. On November 11, 1911, a New York Times reporter described the tragic events in Nanking, where thousands of Manchus, young and old, and infants, were killed in a way never before seen in modern history.
The University of Texas at Austin historian Edward J. M. Rhoads, in his book “Manchus and Han,” quotes British missionaries as saying that the Manchus knelt and begged the revolutionaries to let them go, but were mercilessly brutalized. Wealthy Han Chinese captured Manchu girls as slaves, and soldiers took Manchu women as wives. Some Manchu families would dress their daughters as Han Chinese, but since they were not foot-binding, they were easily discovered. See kill happy, the Hui also joined the “revolution”, together with the burning and looting.
Lu Kangle estimates: Xi’an Wuchang alone, there were 20,000 and 10,000 Manchus killed. In southern China, such as Guangzhou and Fuzhou, there were massacres. According to mainland media figures, there were 600,000 Manchus in Beijing in 1911, but only 30,000 remained in 1949.
Aung San Suu Kyi explained that the Rohingya had killed the Buddhists with violence first. Ditto: the Ten Days of Yangzhou and the Three Massacres of Jiading are just physical forces and counter forces. Just as the Black Lives Matter Gui burned and looted in twenty cities in two months, a small number of patriotic whites entered Capitol Hill on January 6 with a slight collision, which was not only normal but also benevolent.
Therefore, the hearts of Asians are always directed toward Suu Kyi.
Recent Comments