The WHO investigation team announced in Wuhan on February 9 that it was consistent with the CCP’s argument that COVID-19 (the CCP virus) was highly unlikely to have come from the Wuhan Institute of Virus Research. Some experts pointed out that WHO colluded with the CCP to confuse the source of the outbreak with the source of the virus and to divert international attention from the source of the outbreak. Australian experts involved in the WHO investigation in Wuhan said that the outbreak originated in China.
“I think the outbreak started in China,” said Professor Dominic Dwyer, a microbiologist and infectious disease expert at the Australian Department of health, in an interview with News.com.au on the 9th. “I think the evidence that the Epidemic started in other parts of the world is actually very limited. There is some evidence, but it’s not very convincing.”
Professor Dwyer, who flew back to Sydney from China on the 10th and is currently in isolation in a hotel, was the only Australian on the 14-member WHO team that travelled to Wuhan to investigate the outbreak, which was working to determine the source of the epidemic.
But confirming in January that a team of WHO experts would travel to China to launch the investigation, WHO Director-General Tan Desai claimed that “experts are beginning to travel to China to participate and review scientific research on the origins of the new coronavirus (CCP virus) with their Chinese counterparts.”
At a press conference following the conclusion of the WHO investigation, Peter Ben Embarek, chairman of the team, claimed that it was “highly unlikely” that the virus came from the Wuhan Institute of Virus Research, downplaying the origin of the outbreak.
Dr. Xiaoxu Lin, a U.S. virologist and former director of the Virus Research Laboratory at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, made it clear in a Feb. 3 interview with Japan’s The Liberty Web that the WHO had colluded with the Chinese Communist Party to confuse the source of the outbreak with the source of the virus, confusing people with no scientific background and successfully diverting the world’s attention from the true source of the outbreak. This has successfully diverted the world’s attention from the true source of the epidemic.
Peter Ben-Embarek also said that the issue of new coronaviruses emerging from the frozen Food chain will be a matter for continued research.
This is also a narrative that the CCP is attempting to get people to accept. The CCP has repeatedly emphasized that the virus was detected on imported frozen foods or packaging in an attempt to use this to dump the source of the outbreak overseas.
Dwyer argues that there is “very limited evidence” that the outbreak originated outside of China.
Dwyer also believes that “the outbreak in the Wuhan market was indeed an amplified event. The virus may have been spreading in the community for weeks before that.” He said, “Genetic analysis of the virus, among other things, would indicate that the virus may have been spreading since mid-November, early December of last year (read 2019).”
By analyzing the sampling reports from the CCP’s South China Seafood Market, Dr. Lin Xiaoxu noted that the CCP does not in fact believe the outbreak originated from this seafood market in Wuhan. “They’ve done a poor job: they haven’t done any testing on any of the live animals at the South China Seafood Market. If the Chinese (Communist) government really believed that the outbreak originated from this seafood market, they would have conducted animal testing.”
Dwyer also disclosed, “We also know that the Chinese reported that the people who went to the hospital were in serious condition, but we know now – to be fair, they didn’t know (about the outbreak) at the Time. But we now know that the virus is spreading among other healthy people, so there must have been a lot more cases than confirmed last December.”
Australian Prime Minister Morrison was one of the first world leaders to call for an investigation into the origins of the outbreak, which was met with frantic retaliation by the Chinese Communist Party, which restricted imports of Australian beef and coal, and raised taxes on Australian barley and wine.
The WHO experts were only able to enter China to investigate the outbreak a year after it broke out, due to the Chinese Communist Party’s strenuous obstruction. Outsiders jokingly called the WHO trip an “archaeological” one and questioned whether the so-called investigation had actually become a political show to clear the Chinese Communist Party’s name.
The U.S. government has said it wants an independent review of WHO’s findings and underlying data.
Some U.S. lawmakers have denounced the WHO as a puppet of the Chinese Communist Party and have proposed holding Tandezai and other WHO leaders accountable.
Recent Comments