At that Time, I had just written a news article about a farmer in Hebei who adopted ecological farming methods to cultivate his land, and the response was great. The main reason was that the farmer was a fraud and ecological agricultural products were not desirable.
I didn’t know her, but she said she loved the land and the Life of this farmer, and was very enthusiastic.
Further on, I learned that she married a bee farmer in Qinghai and opened her own small store, a successful transition for media people, as I saw several interviews about this story. It was a time of transition for media people, and a time when it was relatively easy to start a business. The stories Ma Jin Yu told were full of beautiful things: the paradisiacal Qinghai grassland, the love of interracial people, and the personal efforts to change the local business ecology, the latter being common, but love was the most special, but also the most dangerous. Will not there be conflicts after a long time? The shelf life of love disappeared how to do?
After that there was no news, I am not a honey lover, and I did not patronize her small store.
I didn’t expect to hear from her again, in this way. The next thing is the overwhelming comments, more shocking in the life of our critics, surging, dirty, revealing only their own filth, no one at all to real for the horse to think, to analyze her situation, to real help her, basically is a variety of abuse, the network to show their skills.
The most common form of discrimination is against Tibetans. Including my readership, there are several women who have made remarks: they (young Tibetan men) still look very handsome, but that taste, are unable to approach it. Quite like the nineteenth century British colonists in India style of speech, there are also a few brave frontier, said: Ha ha, Tibetan boys are very handsome ah, but really, a few steps closer to disgust – others have not yet moved on you, imagine themselves into beautiful prey, “Tarzan of the Apes” to see too much?
Tarzan of the Apes”, “King Kong” in the beauty of the prey how are blonde white, purely in the 19th century, the Western popular stereotypical imagination. In that rotten system, yellow women themselves were also discriminated against, and were always seen as a blurred Oriental presence, acting as the Westerners’ chambermaid, a slave, a discarded love affair.
We’ve had a hard time overturning this discursive discrimination. Thought everyone was completely politically correct, but to our surprise, it has not disappeared at all: only used within the borders of our own country, where people despise various minorities and it is safest to pour dirty water on them, so everyone says anyway.
There are even comments that this region is “a natural justice for women to be beaten to death by their husbands, something that is not surprising and no one cares about”. The overall slander and rumors are close to Nazi rhetoric.
Although Ma Jin Yu’s husband was confirmed to be Han today, no one has apologized for yesterday’s insulting remarks about Tibetans and their region, including several big V. Under the cover of one politically correct statement (anti-domestic violence), how odd it is to practice another so incorrect statement (attacking other ethnic groups, and regions).
The second kind of discrimination is even more common, the abuse of the so-called “literary young women”.
Why do you have to marry after knowing someone for 47 days? (Shorter marriages are not necessarily unfortunate.) Are you crazy to marry a man who is so dirty, violent, and ugly (purely in your imagination)? I don’t know Ma’s husband, but just by virtue of the photo, as a male is considered to be good-looking, Ma married him, and did not disgrace himself, even in the Han area, Ma to find such a good-looking man, we would think that she married a good-looking husband (of course, judging people by their appearance is absurd).
I’m not sure exactly how they met and fell in love, but having seen Ma tell the story several times, there is still a lot of warmth in this story. There are difficulties in getting along, but also daily romance, compared to the traditional love in the Central Plains, this story is more beautiful in comparison, and as a result, it attracted the contempt of the noblewomen, ah, how can you have feelings with such people?
Probably the noblewomen feel that the peasants are really inferior.
Today, I saw the article of pear godmother Zhao Lihua, scolding Ma Jin Yu, scolding San Mao, as if only she married the official’s love the most righteous, so I feel a deep malice. I am not sure when the horse’s Marriage is the beginning of the problem, perhaps began in a time of trivial arguments, disputes over business and traditional human feelings, difficult problems in the Family, to the first time before the hands, I fully believe that there are not only feelings between the two, there is romance, compared to many people’s mediocre marriage, this marriage is not particularly bad, bad is bad in the two people after the problem, did not promptly I’ve seen the horse’s side of the story, at least, is to run away, to get out, to make the problem worse.
From a somewhat interesting story of love marriage, step by step to the vicious end of domestic violence, both sides tore, I can not say that it is all the responsibility of this region and this nation, not even to say that it is all the responsibility of the man, belong to an irresponsible inference, we do not know the mystery, or how to get worse and worse, need further information – -But from this, they start to abuse the literary young woman, put on a mercenary smug face, quite disgusting.
I don’t see how this marriage is any worse than a violent, cold war, where both sides secretly cheat on each other.
The advantageous face to abuse the literary young woman, mocking love people first look at themselves.
The third kind of discrimination comes from the discrimination against the marital status of the horse. This discrimination is more complex, not only for the “ethnic” and The third type of discrimination is more complex, not only against the “ethnic” and “literary young women”, but also against the bottom, that the horse is married to the bottom of society, the horse is the savior instead of being beaten, the horse is too innocent.
I received a private letter today, all kinds of abuse, saying that I said “the horse marriage in the Culture clash” is nonsense, said I was dumbfounded to see that this was not completely putting the horse in an inappropriate position? Is she a goddess getting married? Do you think you witnessed the story of the Seven Fairies and Dong Yong?
In the story told by the horse herself, she also mentioned that she was collecting mushrooms in the grassland, some of which were wetter and contained more water, and she refused to collect them, but her husband was reluctant to offend the neighbors, and the two quarreled. This story is particularly interesting and even worthy of special analysis by cultural scholars. Definitely not the horse represents the advanced and the husband represents the backward, the horse uses the story she tells to portray herself as the local business rule-maker. But is the husband really at fault? It is entirely possible to tell this story according to another set of logic. Isn’t it perfectly acceptable that he, who focuses on kinship, is willing to suffer losses for the sake of neighborly relations and neighborhood balance?
In this conflict, we put too much emphasis on the vulnerable position of the horse as a wife, and ignore the horse as a foreigner, and is knowledgeable, resourceful women, she has some kind of strong position of her own, the husband may not always be strong, especially the horse a complaint, can stir the political and legal committee, and the husband’s voice is completely drowned out, is this fair? The various problems in the marital situation, it would have been difficult to distinguish clearly, the need for more detailed investigation, more detailed judicial intervention, raising the country to roughly scold the bottom of the scum, really is a new kind of network violence.
It is certainly correct to oppose systemic domestic violence, but any solution to domestic violence is not a simple tirade to solve.
Individual misfortunes often have less than humane causes. Based on the available material, the real problem with the horse, in my opinion, is more a matter of indecision, poor judgment, and failure to make timely choices. Just like the couple in the American drama “Big Little Lies”, violence and love have been entangled, we must not complain about Nicole Kidman as the heroine why not divorce earlier, or encourage her to go to court to complain, all her decisions, are generated step by step, and the situation is closely related, these outsiders seem clear solutions, in fact, people in a difficult situation may not understand.
Under all kinds of discrimination, the truth becomes more and more blurred.
All that remains is a pile of obscenities that deeply expose the desolation and filth of the current interconnected world in Jane.
Recent Comments