U.S. media outlet National Archives reported Sunday that Cuban-born U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio, also translated as Rubio, on Feb. 2 re-moved a gun ban bill he has pushed in the past. Under this bill, as long as an individual is under investigation for domestic terrorism, that person would not be able to own a gun, even if they are not charged with any substantial crime.
This bill, in effect, would take away the Second Amendment rights of such people, says The National Archives.
Sen. Rubio pushed for this gun ban bill in Congress after the 2016 nightclub shooting in Orlando, Florida, perpetrated by Islamic terrorists.
According to Rubio’s website, the bill pushes that “individuals who have been subject to a federal terrorism investigation within the past 10 years who have attempted to obtain a firearm, the U.S. attorney general may delay the purchase or transfer of the firearm for 10 business days and file an emergency petition with the court to prevent the transfer of the firearm. If the court finds that the person is likely to engage in terrorism, or has engaged in terrorism, the attorney general can arrest that person.”
Rubio believes the bill, would “provide law enforcement agencies with more authority to pursue suspected terrorists while preserving the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens.
It is unclear whether Rubio’s plan will gain broad enough support in the Democratic-controlled Congress or whether the bill will eventually reach Biden‘s desk.
The Biden Administration‘s current attorney general is Merrick Garland, who has fantasized about taking guns out of the hands of American citizens since 2000.
Meanwhile, intelligence officials friendly to the Biden regime have classified the vast majority of Republicans as domestic terrorists. The National Archives recently reported that Robert Grenier, former director of the CIA‘s Counterterrorism Center, compared American citizens to violent Muslim “insurgents.” He wrote in the New York Times that the past few days have brought a startling realization that what we are witnessing may well be a prelude to a continuing violent insurgency by our fellow citizens within the United States.”
Meanwhile, The Washington Examiner also published an opinion piece by former CIA official, Interior Committee adviser and Homeland Security Secretary Kevin Carroll, in which Carroll drew comparisons between the protesters at the Capitol and al-Qaida.
Noel Fritsch, a pro-Trump Republican political consultant, told the National Archives that he wasn’t even at the Capitol on Jan. 6, but was approached by the FBI to make inquiries anyway. It appears that Rubio’s bill is intended to categorize people like Fritsch among those who need to be denied their Second Amendment rights, the National Archives writes.
Recent Comments