Recently, many multinational companies have accelerated their pace of withdrawal from China. According to the self-published “Cold Eye on Finance”, the massive withdrawal from China and the shift of industrial chain are not only in line with the U.S. strategy of technology blockade in China, but also to avoid the risk of forced technology transfer or technology theft by the Chinese Communist Party.
The recent closure of IBM’s China Research Institute, one of the 12 largest research institutions in the world, means that IBM’s research department has officially withdrawn from China, which has attracted widespread attention at Home and abroad.
IBM China Research Institute’s research areas span a variety of disciplines and industries, with a focus on technological innovation and applications including big data analytics, Cloud Computing, Internet of Things, cognitive computing, as well as in the fields of power and energy, logistics and supply chain, healthcare, telecommunications and financial services, among many other areas.
Looking at the development of IBM in the past 25 years, many well-known scientific achievements have been developed, including the birth of the famous artificial intelligence program “Watson” in the field of cognitive computing in 2011, which was once favored as a medical-assisted artificial intelligence (AI, artificial intelligence) system. intelligence) system, allegedly, only need to enter the patient’s personal information into the system, the system will be from a large number of medical research, medical guidelines and clinical trials and other information, recommended the most appropriate treatment plan for doctors to refer to.
Financial cold eyes pointed out that whether it is IBM’s global leading AI technology, or like the Internet of Things, cloud computing and traditional computing fields are unique, China is facing a blockade of these related technologies by the West, and China itself can not develop, need to obtain the support of the West, focus on breakthroughs and attacks.
The financial cold eye that at this Time, IBM first laid off such high-end scientific research and development departments of the China Research Institute, may not only be because of IBM’s overall business losses so simple, more reason is like the U.S. sanctions huawei, IBM “is in line with the U.S. technology blockade of China’s grand strategy”, because “Any Western giant engaged in high-tech research and development in China is at risk of forced technology transfer, or technology theft, by the Chinese Communist Party. There are numerous companies that have withdrawn from China, such as Google, which announced its withdrawal from the Chinese market in 2010, Yahoo, which also announced its withdrawal from the Chinese market in March 2015 and the closure of Yahoo’s R&D center in Beijing, and Amazon, which also withdrew from China in 2019, and Oracle, which officially closed its R&D center in China in the same year.
Financial cold eyes said, according to the official logic of the Chinese Communist Party, when it was claimed that Chinese companies were strong, and foreign companies were defeated, now after these Chinese giants slowly weakened, will foreign capital come in? But we see that none of these international giants have returned, the key or the United States in the past few years under the high-handed sanctions, China’s industrial chain has formed a major trend of transfer, is irreversible.
Financial cold eye said that the withdrawal of these giants are acting in the direction of Sino-US relations, the US blockade and decoupling of China has intensified the withdrawal of these companies, driving an industrial chain away from China, it can be said that the two are complementary, the US government’s decision to purchase goods produced in the US can be said to be a huge support for the US manufacturing industry, that is, US government procurement are only purchasing US domestic production Products, more than 500 billion U.S. dollars a year of government procurement will stimulate how many U.S. high-tech industries and manufacturing industries back, can be said to be a very optimistic phenomenon, is a huge manufacturing engine, to attract the U.S. manufacturing industry back to revitalize the manufacturing industry a huge signal, high-tech industries out of China may be seen as affected by the policy, but if the labor-intensive factories out of China, so to speak This is what is hurting China, so that the Chinese Communist government is a very big headache, many famous international multinational giants withdrew from China last year.
Recently an old German international electromechanical giant also began to withdraw from China, the German company Dehen Electric issued a notice to employees on January 20 this year, due to trade policy and supplier factors, resulting in increased costs, the group decided to relocate the KPO and KPS product line from Shenzhen, China to India at the end of January.
Public information shows that Dehen Electric was established in Germany in 1947, for the international veteran motor and peripheral electronic components of the development and manufacturing enterprises, in the field of home appliances and industrial automation has a very high reputation and competitiveness.
Dehen motor production technology is mature, is based on labor-intensive and low-cost raw materials, for cost changes are very sensitive, financial cold eyes, said, because of labor-intensive industries, these factories are very concerned about the cost, so the factory moved from China to India, is also the result of natural selection, now it seems, whether it is high-end technology industries or low-end labor-intensive manufacturing, these industrial chains transfer out of China The general direction of the Epidemic in Europe and the United States has not changed, but once the epidemic in Europe and the United States eases, this transfer will accelerate, so whether it is IBM China Research Institute or Germany’s Dehen motor giant to withdraw from China, or whether it is Huawei cell phone shipments fell below the top five in the world, or say like the United Kingdom recently in 44 sensitive areas to restrict Chinese personnel to study and work, are a continuation of the general direction of the decoupling of technology between China and the United States, is also a continuation of the It is also a continuation of the general direction of industrial chain transfer.
The financial cold eye points out that the Chinese Communist Party not only steals the world’s advanced technological achievements, constantly copying, copying, copying, copying, which is another major reason why the Chinese Communist Party can linger on, and now it seems that whether it is the industrial chain or the theft of technology, these two roads are slowly being blocked.
Recent Comments