The official of Shandong province recently visited a “poor Family“, netizens found that the “poor family” has Luxury goods such as Maotai and Wuliangye, the official quickly debunked the rumor. (Internet photo)
In recent years, the Chinese Communist Party‘s official so-called “poverty alleviation” projects have exposed many absurdities, and poor households have become props for officials to show their “political achievements”. Recently, officials in Shandong Province once again made a fool of themselves when they visited a “poor household,” and netizens discovered that the household not only had a three-room apartment, but also had luxury items such as Maotai and Wuliangye hidden in its Home. Then the household was exposed, the official background of their children is very deep.
On February 3, Qingdao City, Shandong Province, Chengyang District, Echinhontan Street Office released a WeChat article “Spring Festival visit to difficult households strong warmth warm hearts”. The article mentions that the party committee and office leadership team members and community cadres of Echinhontan Street went to each community to visit the needy families and send condolences.
According to the article, the visit to 231 low-income households, 34 scattered special hardship households, 263 households in difficulty.
After the article was sent out, one of the pictures was questioned by netizens. The picture that netizens questioned was the first picture in the article. Four staff members from the street office carry several gifts to visit an old man whose hair has turned gray. But at the same Time, the top left corner of the picture is clearly placed two bottles of Maotai wine, placed in the top of the cabinet.
Some people point out that the street office condolences to the needy in name only, and others believe that such behavior is a fraudulent hardship quota.
The official in Qingdao, Shandong province, recently visited a “poor household” and netizens discovered that the “poor household” had luxury items such as Maotai and Wuliangye at home, but officials quickly dispelled the rumors. (Internet photo)
On February 4, the street office responded to the netizens’ questions in a public post, saying that the needy household met the conditions of a needy family. And the picture placed in the Maotai is the difficult household a few years ago to a relative’s home to attend a banquet, see the guests drink leftover empty bottles of wine very much like, so it was brought home to place on the cabinet.
In this regard, many netizens have commented: “I used to see more in the authorities, this household is certainly a driver or a relative of someone in the authorities, living particularly close to the unit, and the family has an old man can say a little piece of Soup.”
“Once took the leadership to condole with poor households. On the way back from the condolence, the leader said, look at that old lady, so many sets of rental housing, than I have money.”
Qingdao city officials recently condoled the “poor households” when the help, exposed the extravagant family background. Subsequently, the “poor household” was revealed, the official background of their children are very deep. (Internet photo)
“The company’s main business is to provide a wide range of products and services to the public. Secondly, how much is an empty bottle of Maotai, you can go online to search, and then look at that bottle of Maotai floating belt are not removed, which is something that can just pick up? The tradition of fake big empty cannot be lost!”
“Many poor households are relatively well-connected families, and this one is no exception! Look at the photos of the three rooms and one hall, Maotai, Wuliangye, top quality tea frozen top oolong, treadmill, wood flooring, LED TV, overall wall cabinet, European-style entry lights, potted plants, poor households have these leisure? In fact, every word they say we do not believe anymore.”
Similar to the above incident, just a few months ago, the secretary of the party working committee of Pingxiang City, Jiangxi Province, visited a local “poor household”, but the picture of the report showed that the “poor household” had a luxuriously decorated home.
Some people questioned, “If this is ‘poverty’, we are all refugees”. But the city’s deputy mayor then debunked the rumor, saying that the “poor household” was “rich before poor”.
Party Secretary of Pingxiang Economic Development Zone, Jiangxi Province, and other officials visit a “poor household” in the area, but the photo accompanying the report shows the “poor household” in a luxuriously decorated home. (Web Photo)
CCP’s “Poverty Alleviation” Fraudulence
In recent years, the Communist Party’s official “poverty alleviation” programs have been criticized by public opinion for their absurdity and for turning poor households into props for officials to showcase their “political achievements.
In November 2017, Dehong Prefecture, Yunnan Province, publicly informed the Longchuan County Civil Affairs Bureau “rely on mountains to eat mountains” collapse of corruption nest case, more than 70% of the cadres and employees of the spouse and immediate family members to eat low security . And Longchuan County is one of the 93 concentrated contiguous special hardship areas in Yunnan Province, poor counties.
In May of the same year, during a national inter-provincial cross-examination of so-called “poverty eradication work”, a county in central China was caught red-handed pretending to be the son of a poor household in order to cope with the inspection.
A mainland netizen, “Linyi micro-information”, disclosed online that some villagers in Xinzhuang Township, Fei County, Linyi, reported that village cadres followed the county leaders to the village to distribute 1,000 yuan (RMB) to poor households, but after the county leaders left, the village cadres came to the villagers’ homes to ask for 800 yuan back, so the villagers got 200 yuan of the poverty alleviation money. This caused dissatisfaction among several villagers.
Wuhan TV in Hubei province disclosed in late November 2016 that some local officials never came back after taking pictures with poor households; there are also sick elderly people listed as poverty alleviation households, officials arranged for the elderly who do not know farming techniques to raise chickens, and finally not only all the chickens died, the elderly also subsidized a lot of money for this.
The mainland WeChat public website “Kneeling Terracotta” once disclosed that a poor household in Shaanxi Province had died eight years ago, but his direct Food subsidies had been fraudulently claimed by officials until after the official stepped down from his post.
In August 2016, in Kangle County, one of the 43 national poverty-stricken counties in Gansu Province, a tragic case of human family was reported that a young mother, Yang Cailan, killed her four children in poverty and then took poison to kill herself, and her husband also died soon after.
After the incident, Guo Rui, a senior mainland media figure, found that the low-income quota was distributed to the village secretary’s own brother and nephew, among others.
In an editorial in the Southern Metropolis Daily, the government’s long-standing policy of bogus “low-income guarantees” was mentioned. The article revealed that the government does not issue the “low income guarantee” according to the actual number of poor people in the town, but according to the target issued by the top and the “relationship” of the relatives. This “low-benefit corruption” has resulted in at least half of China’s urban poor being left without low-benefit coverage.
In May 2020, Li Keqiang revealed at a press conference that 600 million people in mainland China earn about 1,000 yuan a month. According to a survey conducted by the Income Distribution Research Institute of Beijing Normal University, the total number of people earning less than 1,090 yuan a month is 600 million; the total number of people earning less than 2,000 yuan a month is 963 million.
At the end of last year, the Communist Party announced that “all poor people in the country have been lifted out of poverty. Civil society scholars believe that the authorities rushed to announce the “national poverty elimination” in order to save money.
Recent Comments