A few days ago, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) proposed to “try out a system of registering household registration by place of permanent residence,” but instead of applauding the system, a large number of Chinese netizens feel that it is a “detrimental move” made by the authorities to scam rural land and de-stocking urban real estate.
According to land media reports, the General Office of the CPC Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council recently issued the “Action Plan for Building a High Standard Market System”, saying it is “of great significance to speed up the construction of a new development pattern with the domestic circulation as the main body and the dual domestic and international circulation promoting each other”.
The “program” includes six major points, including “promote the efficient allocation of factor resources” in the point mentioned in the “trial implementation of the registration of household registration system in the place of permanent residence”, triggering a lot of debate among mainland netizens.
The document said that, in addition to mega and mega cities, in eligible metropolitan areas or city clusters to explore the implementation of the cumulative mutual recognition of the years of household registration access to the same city, the trial implementation of the registration of household registration system in the place of permanent residence, to guide the population to settle, but also “improve the national unified public service platform for social insurance, to promote the transfer of social security continuity.
Some netizens pointed out that the words “in addition to mega and megacities” exclude 16 cities, including six mega cities: Shanghai, Beijing, Chongqing, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Tianjin and 10 megacities: Dongguan, Wuhan, Chengdu, Hangzhou, Zhengzhou, Nanjing, Xi’an, Jinan, Shenyang, Qingdao.
Some people believe that, excluding these cities, the so-called “household registration system by place of permanent residence” is “useless”.
In addition, netizens also raised at least four points of doubt about the system.
The first is that it is a new tactic of the Chinese Communist Party to cheat farmers out of their land.
The first is that it is a new tactic of the Chinese Communist Party to cheat farmers of their land. Trying to cheat farmers out of their land.
“Meow Meow…”: It’s just that the city’s land is almost finished, so the brain moves to the peasants’ land.
“Xing Qing…”: advice to those who have a rural account please cherish it, turn out easy, turn back (difficulty) is comparable to the sky…
Secondly, it is thought to promote small city real estate to inventory.
Some say, “Forcing the masses to buy houses in the city. The price of housing down naturally sold more, why do damage.”
Others said, “I feel that people are buying houses to inventory, because rural people go to the city to work for a long Time can not go back to the city to buy a house.”
Third, question whether the system is mandatory or gives people the right to choose voluntarily.
“Wei Xiao…”: So people who don’t want to give up their rural hukou, can they still keep their rural hukou?
“Paddy…”: The premise must be voluntary, after all, urban hukou is not necessarily rare for everyone.
“Hi I…”: this is a disguised way to let you move your account? A lot of rural young people are working outside and buying a house, but they won’t move their hukou out!
Fourthly, it is believed that for foreign workers, the hukou is not the main concern at present, the implementation of a unified health insurance and social security in the country is.
Some people say, “medical insurance first common it, area code are the same place medical insurance can not brush, buy drugs difficult ah.”
“Social security can be seamlessly connected is the most important, change a place to work, social security is really too much trouble!”
“The key is the unification of social security medical insurance, the network era this should not be difficult, is it the slow advancement caused by the lazy administration of the relevant departments?”
Some netizens also believe that whatever policies the CCP pursues are not for the sake of the common people, but for the benefit of the party’s rule, only adopting different strategies at different times.
“Star…” said, “One is a sickle and the other is a hammer on the party flag. Why use a hammer when you can use a sickle (cut leeks). When you’re in a hurry, you can see if you want to use a hammer.”
Recent Comments