Recently, Hu Xijin, the nation’s most active editor-in-chief, made a statement about the global fight against the Epidemic. “There are countries that give money to everyone, but that belongs to coaxing everyone, and all the money is basically the same as none of it. “
Other than that, the logic is very touching.
With the return of the gentleman tried to use this logic to create sentences, found that greatly revolutionized the world view:.
If you don’t give money to everyone, you are basically giving money to everyone.
To tax everyone is basically the same as no taxes, which is basically the same as everyone not paying taxes.
Giving everyone a down jacket would be the same as giving everyone no clothes, and the winter would be even colder.
Giving everyone a year-end bonus would be basically the same as having no year-end bonus. So don’t envy those companies that have year-end bonuses for all employees.
The company that makes everyone work overtime is the same as no one working overtime. So don’t condemn those companies with 996 and 007.
Giving social security to all takeaway workers is basically the same as having no social security. So for takeaway workers, you can’t do the social security thing.
All vegetables, fruits, chicken, fish, meat and eggs are up in price, it is basically the same as no price increase. The people should be assured to buy, boldly buy, we all have the same price, buy not to lose.
All people go Home for the New Year, it is basically the same as not going home. So everyone should not go home for the New Year. Accordingly, if everyone spends New Year’s Eve in place, it is basically the same as everyone going home for New Year’s Eve.
If everyone is infected, it is basically the same as no one is infected. You see, this logic, in the future, the United States, India may be used.
And every woman in the circle of friends in a relationship, it is the same as not in a relationship, equals single. Suddenly found a shortcut to justify the scum, especially the sea king: Hu Chief Editor said ……
All of one’s microblogs say they love their country, it is basically the same as not loving their country.
All media say a certain policy is good, it is basically the same as this policy is not good.
Everyone who pays for their own quarantine is basically the same as not spending any money.
Everyone doing the nucleic acid test once is basically the same as no one doing the nucleic acid test.
While watching Laohu’s microblog, I overheard a blurb about the Tonghua area and the lack of sanitary napkins for health care workers, saying that sanitary napkins are not included in the epidemic prevention supplies and are not allowed to go through the green channel.
This problem, exposed last year, many netizens therefore accused the local homework can not copy.
I tried to use this logic of Laohu to argue.
All supplies are well thought out and prepared, it is basically the same as not prepared, which does not show what effective work has been done.
If all the health care workers are short of sanitary napkins, it is the same as not. So, don’t be too concerned.
It is also very reminiscent of Professor Li Yi’s lofty statement that 4,000 dead people are equal to no dead people. It’s almost like an absolute double whammy.
A netizen said aptly that Hu Xijin’s so-called dialectic is actually when he wants to praise a thing, he will first say a little of its shortcomings, and then boast of its benefits.
In this way, it gives a sense of neutrality, objectivity and comprehensiveness, but also achieves the pre-determined dialectical purpose.
Although this method is extremely simple, it can fool a lot of people.
With the return of the Jun try to use this method to boast about Laohu, feel good to use:.
The level of Laohu’s speech, which sometimes seems to lack logic and defy common sense, is only a small part. The overall level of Laohu’s speech is still good.
First of all, the old Hu is very diligent, almost every day more blog, a long argument, the general public do not have the energy and perseverance. Laohu is not an ordinary person.
Secondly, Laohu’s text is very fixed, which shows that Laohu’s values are very stable, and also shows that Laohu is a stable person.
Moreover, Laohu is good at using various tricky postures to find out the positive value from a thing that is originally considered negative, polishing and polishing it to make it as white as clean.
This is in the leading position when you look at the editors-in-chief all over the world.
Of course, if everyone thinks this logic of Laohu doesn’t make sense, then it is basically the same as making sense.
Complete victory.
Recent Comments