New and old U.S. national security advisers talk to each other about differences in policies toward the Chinese Communist Party

On Friday, outgoing U.S. national security adviser John O’Brien and current national security adviser John Sullivan expressed different views on the national security strategies of the two administrations, especially on their policies toward the Chinese Communist Party.

As Trump leaves office and Biden takes office, there are important shifts in U.S. national security policy.

The first important issue we’re passing on to the next administration is the Chinese Communist Party, an overconfident and rising Chinese Communist Party, which has become the primary, generational geopolitical challenge for the United States,” said former national security adviser O’Brien.

In a conversation with his successor Sullivan, former national security adviser O’Brien said the security challenges facing the United States are first and foremost the Chinese Communist regime, followed by Iran, Russia, and transnational criminal groups.

In a conversation with his successor, Sullivan said the U.S. needs to prioritize the viral Epidemic and economic crisis, followed by strengthening alliances and repairing existing security structures based on values.

The most far-reaching national security challenge the United States is facing is getting its internal problems right,” said Sullivan, now national security adviser.

In response to the Chinese Communist challenge, Sullivan sees four major steps that need to be taken, the first of which is to reorganize domestic policy in response to the propaganda that the Chinese Communist model is better than the American model.

Sullivan, now the U.S. national security adviser, said, “We need to restructure the foundations of our democracy, from the democratic system itself to racial inequality and economic inequality.

Sullivan also spoke of strengthening ties with democratic allies, maintaining a competitive edge in technology, and taking concrete action on issues such as human rights.

Sullivan, now the U.S. national security adviser, said, “Finally, it’s about being clear and consistent on these issues and being ready to take action and make the Chinese Communist Party pay for what it did in Xinjiang and Hong Kong.

Experts say Sullivan’s avoidance of considering the Chinese Communist Party as the top threat shows a fundamental difference between the Biden and Trump administrations.

Senior commentator Tang Jingyuan: “The Trump Administration has made it very clear that the most important threat to the Chinese Communist government is the threat to values, or the threat to ideology. And the Biden Administration‘s so-called domestic agenda is, to some extent, in line with the ideological expansion of the Chinese Communist Party, that is, the far-left agenda he is pushing. I think this is the most fundamental difference between the Biden administration and the Trump administration.