This year’s World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, held from January 25 to 29, focused attention on the Epidemic, with topics such as how to build confidence in vaccines, how to deal with the epidemic crisis, how the virus affects mental health and more, and proposed the concept of “Great Reset,” which sees The Wuhan pneumonia outbreak in China was seen as an opportunity to rethink the future of humanity. In fact, Forum Chairman Klaus Schwab advocated the so-called “Great Reset” six months ago, pointing out in his book “Covid-19: the Great Reset” that the current world is in a state of flux due to “globalization and technological progress. Globalization and technological progress” have brought about three major characteristics: interdependence, speed and complexity.
Interdependence means that countries are not islands, and they cite the analogy that humans on earth no longer live on more than a hundred ships, but in a hundred cabins on the same ship. The second is speed, the speed of change and transformation of all people, events and things is quite high, and when a crisis arises, the risk increases quite fast. Ironically, they use the spread of pneumonia in Wuhan as an example to show the speed of risk diffusion. In fact, the financial tsunami also shows that even if a crisis occurs only in one country, it quickly becomes a global financial crisis with a high degree of interdependence. The third is complexity, which they describe with the term “quantum politics”, in short, uncertainty. There is no doubt that uncertainty is even more pronounced when local crises are rapidly transformed into global crises, and that dealing with global crises may be beyond existing knowledge and capacity, with contagion having a direct impact on the “failure of global governance.
The globalists see these three attributes as positive values, but the financial tsunami and the Wuhan pneumonia crisis inevitably call into question the value of such attributes. To some extent, the World Economic Forum, as a die-hard globalist, is responsible for the scourge of globalization. However, they still assume that these three characteristics are good, so the way to solve the crisis is to cooperate more and more closely.
Why is it bad to reduce interdependence among countries, to slow down the so-called global development and to reduce complexity? In short, why is it bad to reverse the shift to globalization? Globalists do not imagine that globalization can be reversed, and should not be reversed, because humanity has no choice but to replace it with fragmentation, essentialism and anger, and such a dynamic is itself a crisis. They are convinced that the global community needs a major reorganization not only at the macro level – economic, social, geopolitical, environmental and technological – but also at the micro level – industrial and corporate – and at the individual level.
The World Economic Forum invited world figures such as Prince Charles of England to endorse the globalist “Great Reorganization” and they have continued to promote it for some Time since. Could a world government be the goal envisioned by these globalists? Could a world government be the goal that these globalists envision, one in which the problems of humanity can be dealt with more effectively?
However, how would such a world government come about? Would it be a global central government? Would it be a giant spirit with highly centralized power? But if the epidemic can be slowed down, countries will carefully analyze and evaluate the scourge and damage of the epidemic and reflect on the good and bad of globalization, and globalists need not rush to whitewash an already bloodless globalization.
Recent Comments