Video goes viral! CNN female reporter and the left-wing radical who incited the congressional riots get high on each other.
Here comes the doom! Biden’s inauguration rehearsal is rescheduled due to security concerns. Biden’s team’s first budget proposal is criticized for raising taxes on the working class.
Revolution! Harvard students sign a petition to revoke the degrees of “Trump supporters”.
Will it work? U.S. constitutional law experts caution that the left’s conversion of congressional events into impeachment is a smokescreen intended to distract Americans from election fraud. The government has also proposed four initiatives to root out election fraud.
CNN Female Reporter Gets High With Left-Wing Radicals Who Incited Congressional Riots
CNN photojournalist Jade Sacker’s image of her celebrating with left-wing radicals inside the U.S. Capitol with each other on Jan. 6 has gone viral online.
The latter, named John Sullivan, has been prosecuted by the Justice Department. They seemed pleased with the riot, adding, “We did it!”
The video shows Sark asking, “You’re not filming this, are you?” Sullivan replies, “I’ll delete that stuff.” It turns out he didn’t delete it, and led to the video going viral online.
Sullivan was the first confirmed left-wing agitator involved in the congressional riots.
Biden inauguration rehearsal rescheduled due to security concerns
U.S. media outlet Politico reported that the inauguration rehearsal, originally scheduled for Sunday, has been rescheduled for next Monday (Jan. 18).
The report said Biden and his team members’ planned trip from Wilmington to Washington on Amtrak next Monday has also been canceled. Biden’s team declined to comment on the schedule change.
Biden’s team’s first budget proposal criticized for raising taxes on working people
On Friday (15), House Budget Committee member Jason Smith, a Missouri Republican, sent a letter to Ted Kaufman, head of the Biden transition team, questioning the Biden team’s first budget proposal, which shows a tax hike on working Americans.
Smith tweeted on the 15th that, as the ranking Republican member of the House Budget Committee, he intends to find answers for working-class Americans who do not want their taxes raised to grow the government or fund the unrealistic promises it made in its campaign.
To that end, Smith sent a letter specifically to Kaufman, pointing out that the new administration’s budget exposes its plans to raise taxes.
As the highest-ranking Republican on the Budget Committee, Smith strongly opposed the Democrats’ removal of budgetary limits on government spending and the implementation of so-called pay-as-you-go, or PAYGO, provisions that would allow Democrats to further increase spending on climate change proposals such as the Green New Deal.
“Such provisions are designed as a mechanism to force through the Green New Deal and other socialist policies that are designed to hurt American workers, families and farmers.” Smith added.
“The day after the 117th Congress was sworn in, House Democrats sought to deny Americans the transparency of information they deserve by aggressively promoting an expensive radical wish list.” Smith said.
It’s a revolution! Harvard Students Sign Petition to Revoke Degrees of ‘Trump Supporters’
Students at Harvard University have issued a petition demanding that the university revoke the degrees of three political figures for supporting Biden’s claims of election fraud and inciting the so-called “riots” on Capitol Hill, which they say are a white supremacist social movement.
According to Foxbusiness, four students at Harvard University are currently petitioning to revoke the degrees of three political figures, including White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany, Republican Senator Rafael Edward Cruz and Congressman Dan Crenshaw, after banning Trump administration officials from speaking at the university last year.
Legal experts have analyzed that the congressional riots are still in legal battles, and it is difficult to revoke the degrees of their supporters in the name of supporting Trump and inciting violence. A spokesman for Harvard University declined to comment on this, only confirming the existence of the petition campaign.
Apollo.com commentator Yang Xu said, “This is nonsense! The degree is a reflection of past learning in school, and has no direct relationship with the future. The degree must not be allowed to become a stick for the left to fight against dissidents.
They don’t have time or reason to impeach, so divert the public’s attention and don’t fall for it!
U.S. constitutional law expert Robert G. Natelson recently wrote in the English-language Epoch Times that stirring up public outrage over the illegal break-in at the Capitol is a distraction; don’t let it stop us from planning and implementing our immediate agenda.
Constitutional law expert Nathanson said: I’ve been in politics for more than 50 years. I know it’s a distraction, and those who are trying to turn events in Congress into impeachment know that they don’t have the time or the reason to do it. They also know that President Donald Trump is not inciting illegal behavior.
Robert noted that this diversion has three goals.
(1) To divert public attention away from the election irregularities and the legitimacy of the Biden presidency.
(2) To prevent an honest investigation of those irregularities.
(3) To prevent corrective action.
Constitutional experts propose a four-pronged approach to rooting out election fraud
To ameliorate many of the problems plaguing the 2020 election, constitutional law expert Robert has done an analysis and proposed a four-project agenda.
This agenda focuses on state legislatures, he said. There is little hope for progress at the federal level, where the system – and perhaps the elections themselves – are corrupt. In Washington, power and incentives work against responsible as well as competent Americans, who are the backbone of our nation.
In the federal political game, we always have to start at our own two-yard line and run with the football climb. The other team, on the other hand, starts running downhill from our 20-yard line. The referees (aka the mainstream media) make every real or imagined call against our team and rarely against the opponent.
This is why fiscally conservative Americans have not succeeded at the federal level. It’s why, with the exception of Ronald Reagan, no president has been consistently conservative for nearly a century. (Trump is a conservative on some issues, but a liberal on fiscal matters.)
In the 2020 election, while Trump is allegedly losing, at the state level, conservatives are gaining ground. Republicans (not all of whom are undeniably conservative) now control the legislatures and governorships in 23 states. In at least seven other states, they control both houses of the legislature without a governorship.
While it is not widely known, state legislatures are at the heart of our constitutional system. They have the power to force changes in the operation of the union, in some cases without even the consent of the governor.
The following is a brief description of four items.
Item 1.
Voters must educate state legislators about their constitutional role and motivate them to fulfill that role. As noted above, state lawmakers have an important constitutional responsibility. They manage the presidential election process, they have a lot of say in the congressional election process, and they can control the constitutional amendment process. State legislatures have been neglecting these responsibilities. This must change.
Item 2.
Reform state election laws. the need for this will be obvious after the 2020 election. The details of what needs to be addressed will vary from state to state. However, it is clear that the misuse of mail-in ballots is anomalous and unconstitutional. That said, it is clear that changing election laws will not cure all corruption. This is the reason for proposing item #3.
Item 3.
This applies to states that have a history of ballot corruption in large cities or college towns. These states include six swing states where Republicans control the legislature: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Their legislatures should pass resolutions to have these states’ presidential electors elected by Congress rather than by popular vote. Maine and Nebraska have already done so, and the Supreme Court has upheld this approach.
The governor’s consent is not necessary. This reform would effectively contain local corruption to a few congressional districts, rather than allowing corruption to affect presidential elections in entire states.
Item 4.
Convince as many state legislatures as possible to support the “Convention of States” constitutional amendment petition. These amendments would establish federal term limits and limit federal power. In the long run, this is the most important of the four agenda items.
All political factions recognize that our current system of governance has certain problems: deep divisions among citizens; enormous special interest influence; poorly functioning and sometimes abusive government; excessive centralization of power; and an oligarchy (whether you call it “deep government” or the “military-industrial complex”) that is not controlled by the people.
Only a convention of states, or in the words of the Constitution, a “convention to propose amendments,” has the will and power to propose constitutional reforms that address these problems. Only a state legislature can ensure a convention.
Each of these four goals can be achieved in any environment where productive Americans, rather than so-called “progressive” interests, prevail. Each is a relatively small change, but one with great potential impact.
Recent Comments