In the New Year’s Eve of 2020, Fang Fang, a Chinese writer who was persecuted by official forces and wrote a diary of the closure of Wuhan city during the outbreak of the Communist Party of China (CPC) virus (Wuhan Pneumonia), criticized the extreme left force, saying that “the extreme left force is the existence of China that harms the country and the people.” If this extreme left virus is allowed to infect the whole society, China will have no future.
The year 2020 “will be a year of trials and hardships, so I don’t want to say more,” Fang wrote on his micro blog late on New Year’s Eve (Dec 31). Record two paragraphs as notes and summaries for the year, or as highlights “.
The first paragraph of the article is a suicide note written by Chang Kai, a director of Hubei Film Studio, on his deathbed after he contracted Wuhan pneumonia in February 2020. Since then, the letter has been widely circulated on the Chinese Internet, known as “Chang Kai’s suicide letter”, which caused a huge response.
In the second paragraph, Fang quoted the last entry in his Wuhan diary, which read: “I will say again and again: the extreme left is China’s disastrous existence! They are the biggest resistance to reform and opening up! If we allow this far-left force to run amble and allow this virus to infect the whole society, reform will surely fail and China will have no future “.
At the end of the article, Fang said that history will remember “the chang Kai of 2020”, as well as “the difficulties and perseverance we have had”, and that “I am still full of expectations” for 2021.
Fang’s comments on his weibo account have resonated. Supporters generally expressed high affirmation and support to Fang.
But Fang has also been attacked by pro-government netizens in the mainland. Among them, Sima Nan, a well-known leftist in the mainland, posted a post attacking Fang fang, saying that she holds “the right to define the extreme left” firmly in her hand, “the standard is set by her, the hat is made by her, and who she flies to is determined by her”.
Fang Fang, whose real name is Wang Fang, was born in Nanjing, Jiangsu province, and grew up in Wuhan, Hubei Province. After the outbreak of the COMMUNIST Party of China (CPC) virus, Fang Started to write “Fang Fang’s diary” on his microblog every day from January 25, 2020 for 60 days until March 25, when he stopped writing.
The Diary of Wuhan, written by Fang Fang, reveals what wuhan saw and felt during the closure of the city due to the Communist Party virus epidemic.
Dai Jianye, a professor at Central China Normal University in Wuhan, tweeted on February 24th that communist Party officials had sent hundreds of journalists to the affected areas, “but they all add up to less than one person”. Fang’s diary became a small window into Wuhan during the lockdown.
Fang fang’s wuhan diary, however, has been attacked by the Communist Party and state media, and criticized by mainland Chinese netizens.
Fang’s diary will hit Amazon in English and German on April 8, 2020. The move triggered a barrage of criticism from mainland Chinese, who accused Fang of being a “traitor” and “endangering national interests”, while others called for a team to go to Wuhan to kill her. Others posted a punitive broadcharacter poster, threatening fang fang to “repent and apologize for his mistakes in the way of death”, which could be described as a cultural Revolution-style “wen-Offensives”. Their blatant remarks caused an international uproar.
In May last year, Zhang Boli, member of an expert group of the CPC Central Committee guiding Group for Epidemic prevention and control, academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering and president of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, gave a so-called “Ideological and Political Lesson on Fighting the epidemic” to college and primary and secondary school students in Tianjin via a live webcast.
In particular, it said, “Teachers, professors and students in some universities, represented by Fang’s diary, have been exposed to the epidemic to their distorted values.” For making “inappropriate comments” during the epidemic.
Zhang’s naming and shaming during the official presentation provoked a furious response from Fang.
On May 13, Fang posted a message on his microblog criticizing Zhang — a “Cultural Revolution-style criticism” — and demanding that he publicly apologize
Recent Comments