On Tuesday (22), President Trump‘s lawyer Rudy Giuliani said he expects several big stories to break in the next few days about the Georgia voting machines.
Speaking Tuesday on “War Room: Pandemic,” Giuliani said, “I happen to know that we’re going to have a big story or two about the (voting) machines in the next day or two in the state of Joe. Let me pray for luck.”
Many counties in the state of Joe use Dominion voting system machines. A forensic audit (Forensic Audit) in Michigan recently concluded that the Dominion voting system was designed to influence elections.
Recently, William Ligon, Republican chairman of the Joe Senate Election Law Study Subcommittee, released a report on the Nov. 3 election. Giuliani said, “This is the first breakthrough of its kind.” The report said election workers appeared to have engaged in coordinated illegal activity. He was referring to the period when the vote count was conducted without supervision.
The release of the report, Giuliani said, could trigger a special session in Joe State to decertify the election results. Since the Joe State House is controlled by Republicans with a Republican majority, he said, “this would be an opportunity.”
Speaking of voting machines, Giuliani also said, “Maybe a little bit of additional information about fraud or deception would be more than enough to overturn the election results.”
Giuliani also said Tuesday that the Trump campaign has evidence of voting machine malfunction throughout the Joe State.
“In one place in rural Joe State, we checked the election results three times and got three different results.” He said.
Joe State House Speaker David Ralston (R), state Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Jesse Stone (R) and Vice Chairman Bill Cowsert (R), all did not respond to requests for comment.
Ligon did not respond when asked if other members of the Election Law Study Subcommittee supported the report.
Sen. Elena Parent (D-Mass.), a member of the subcommittee, told The Epoch Times by email, “The report was never shared with me. This report was not voted on or considered by the committee. It represents nothing more than the views of the chairman as a single lawmaker.”
Recent Comments