Supreme Court has taken up Joe State election fraud case, says Linwood barrister “We found the evidence,” Arizona election case goes to Supreme Court.
Supreme Court refuses to take it up, Texas AG responds forcefully, President Trump makes appeal. This follows the latest news that President Trump and six states have asked to join the Texas lawsuit as plaintiffs. The number of House members supporting the Texas lawsuit rose to 126. Texas lawmakers will propose a referendum to decide whether or not to “form a separate state.
Why are the 3 justices nominated by Trump unconstitutional? Have more than 20 states failed to protect the constitution?
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has responded forcefully to the U.S. Supreme Court’s 11-day refusal to hear Texas’ election case against four swing states.
Texas Attorney General Paxton took four swing states – Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia – to the Supreme Court on August 8, suing them for unconstitutional election procedures.
After the Supreme Court announced its refusal Friday night, Texas Attorney General Paxton issued a statement saying it was unfortunate that the Supreme Court decided not to take the case and did not determine whether the four states’ failure to comply with federal and state election laws (were) constitutional. “I will continue to work tirelessly to defend the integrity and security of elections and hold accountable those who would overturn established election laws for their own benefit.”
President Trump also tweeted a short video questioning the fairness of the election, which ended with a call for the American people to call the legislature and ask them to fight for an honest election.
The lawsuit comes after Texas sued four swing states after President Trump and six states have filed motions with the Supreme Court to join the lawsuit. As of Friday (Dec. 11), 126 Republican lawmakers in the House of Representatives supported the Texas lawsuit challenging the 2020 election, including House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.).
2 Linwood: Supreme Court Has Taken Up Joe State Election Fraud Case
On the same day that the Supreme Court declined to take up the Texas lawsuit, on Dec. 11, Trump team barrister Lin Wood tweeted, “[The Joe State fraud case] is finally on the Supreme Court docket!”
The Supreme Court’s website, published in Lin Wood’s tweet, shows that Lin Wood’s case against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger was decided by the Supreme Court on Dec. 5 and listed on the docket on Dec. 11.
Lin Wood’s case against Laffensperger began Nov. 13. At that time, Lin Wood sued Laffensperger and other state officials in federal court in Atlanta, alleging that his agreement with the state’s Democratic Party last March to change Joe State’s absentee ballot processing procedures was unconstitutional.
4 Arizona election case goes to Supreme Court: “We found the evidence”
Arizona Republican Party Chairman Kelli Ward announced Friday (11) that a lawsuit filed by the state’s Republicans over election fraud will go to the Supreme Court.
According to Breitbart News, Ward said Friday that if the appeal is accepted, the case will become the third fraud case before the U.S. Supreme Court regarding the 2020 presidential election.
Ward explained that they appealed the case to the Supreme Court because the state did not follow proper procedures. She said, “In our view, the lack of due process is unconstitutional and it’s time for a case to be filed, for discovery and for a holistic hearing.”
Ward emphasized, “The media always likes to say, ‘Show us the evidence.’ We find the evidence, but then we don’t have enough time to find more evidence because they hide it.”
Ward said the judge set an unrealistic deadline, effectively giving the plaintiffs only three days to examine up to 3 million ballots, and that was impossible to accomplish.
WI Supreme Court accepts appeal of WI invalid ballot lawsuit
The Trump camp is fighting a major legal battle in several U.S. states, where the Trump camp’s lawsuit was dismissed in a lower Wisconsin court, but the Supreme Court accepted the appeal.
A Wisconsin judge rejected the Trump camp’s claim that the election process was illegal, with Judge Stephen Simanek declaring that the vote count was open and transparent and not in dispute.
The Trump camp appealed the decision to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which accepted the appeal. The Supreme Court previously refused to send the case directly to the lower court without hearing it, but the Trump camp is now able to bring the case before the WI Supreme Court, which has a majority of conservative judges and is expected to hear it over the weekend.
The Associated Press pointed out that the Supreme Court decided to hear arguments 48 hours before the Electoral College vote, that is, Saturday, after the lower court ruled that there were no irregularities in the elections in the two major counties in WI, which is quite unusual.
In addition, the Trump camp’s lawsuit in Michigan was dismissed. The Trump camp claimed that Republican poll watchers were barred from entering the Detroit counting center, but the Michigan Supreme Court rejected the Trump camp’s appeal.
Recent Comments