On the evening of December 11, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed Texas’ case against four states for unconstitutional elections on the grounds that Texas could not prove that its interests were affected by the election issues in other states and therefore lacked standing to bring the case legally. It was reported that of the nine justices, only Justices Samuel Alito and Thomas agreed to hear the case, both issuing separate statements saying, “In my opinion, we have no authority to reject a petition that falls within our jurisdiction.”
The result was unexpected by many, especially since three of President Trump’s appointees voted against the case, making it difficult for some to understand. This case highlights the special nature of this election dispute – it transcends party, politics, religion, and ethnicity, and asks questions of conscience, striking at the deepest part of each person’s heart.
The Supreme Court’s dismissal of the case seems to be based on a provision of the Constitution, but it defies common sense and principle and is merely an attempt to escape liability, which is completely inconsistent with the facts. Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia changed their election statutes without the approval of their state legislatures and treated their voters unfairly, indirectly causing fraud to occur, resulting in the tampering of millions of votes and the theft of President Trump’s victory. The fraudster’s criminal actions directly harmed the rights of all legal voters, which in effect harmed all 50 states, so how is Texas irrelevant?
Giuliani lawyers interviewed said the Supreme Court wants to stay out of it, “They don’t want to give us a chance to hear the facts, they don’t want the American people to hear them.”
The Supreme Court justices are clear that once the case is accepted, the prosecution will have the opportunity to present evidence and conduct a prosecution defense, at which point it will be difficult for them to rebut, and the situation will favor the prosecution and President Trump. From this perspective, the seven justices blocked the voices of Texas and the 25 pro-prosecution states with their dissenting votes, while blocking a path for President Trump to seek legal justice. This is so unfair to all those calling for “stop stealing elections” that it would be a “betrayal”. It is a betrayal of a democratically elected president who was attacked in a coup, and a violation of the rights of the voters as set forth in the Constitution of the United States and this law.
It is astonishing and disappointing that this time it is the Supreme Court, which is supposed to be the strongest defender of the Constitution, that is ignoring the destruction of the election and abdicating its responsibility to uphold justice. At a time when the leftist media monopolizes information, social media giants shield the truth, and leftists and socialists cry foul against Republicans, and when the Justice Department, the FBI and other departments deliberately fail to act, the Supreme Court justices join the stream and fall on President Trump.
Indeed, prior to this, many people who support President Trump (both in and outside the United States) have warned that the justices may not be credible. Today, reality shows that seemingly firm ideas or creeds collapse instantly when personal interests may encounter the most serious shocks in the face of screaming and threats from the left. The judges do not lack knowledge, but lamentably fail to demonstrate moral courage. Their cowardice hides a hypocrisy that suddenly discredits their aura of “conservative” and “elite”.
Although the Texas lawsuit was dismissed, its significance remains. The Texas attorney general’s call for justice on behalf of the state’s voters rallied the forces of 25 Republican states to deter fraudulent gangs. In addition, the case allowed nine Supreme Court justices to take a stand and opened the eyes of the public to the legal failures associated with election fraud.
The 2020 election has unveiled a number of dark secrets: the blatant theft of votes, the shamelessness of fake news, the corruption of politicians, the shirking of judges, and the chaos that reminds Americans that this is a crisis in which lies cover up the truth, criminals claim to be “legitimate,” and fraud subverts integrity. Moral decay is manifesting, dividing and eroding America at various levels.
If truth is considered “controversial,” if investigating the truth and pursuing justice is “undermining democracy,” and if the reasonable and legitimate prosecution of lawbreakers is deemed incompetent, then the nation will not be a nation. As an Arizona congressman put it, why should people obey the law or vote?
As right and wrong are turned upside down, and as the beacon of freedom is attacked by leftist and Communist forces, more and more people are realizing what it means to “fight for Trump. President Trump’s vow that “we will never surrender” is a testament to his extraordinary courage.
For more than a month, at least hundreds of thousands of voters have called and written to their state legislators to challenge the election and expose the fraud they experienced. Thousands of people have testified under oath, hundreds have appeared at hearings, and they have defied threats with awe. One Pennsylvania postal employee who broke the story said, “I don’t want to say to myself one day in the future that I had the opportunity to come forward and didn’t act.”
On December 12, the American people will launch a series of “Stop Voter Theft, Support Trump’s Re-election” marches and rallies in Washington, D.C., and six controversial state capitals. Tomorrow, the brave will continue to fight for justice.
Recent Comments