Texas filed a lawsuit to the U.S. Supreme Court to invalidate the results of four state elections, supported by President Trump and 17 other states. What are the odds of a Trump reversal? How many possibilities are there for a lawsuit?
Trump sent nine tweets in a row in an hour, calling the election fraud a “coup” for the first time. Trump camp new breakthrough, the U.S. Senate will hold election investigation hearings.
The spy Fang Fang was implicated, the U.S. Congressman was removed from the House Intelligence Committee. Fang Fang’s Facebook page shows that she may have just returned to the United States, netizens speculate whether she was caught.
Trump tweeted 9 times in an hour, calling the election fraud a “coup” for the first time
On Thursday morning (December 10), U.S. President Donald Trump sent out nine tweets in a row within an hour, citing media reports for the first time, publicly denouncing the election fraud as a “coup”.
Within an hour from 9:15 a.m. to 10:15 a.m. EST on Thursday, Trump sent out nine consecutive tweets exposing the election fraud. The first few tweets accused the Democratic Party of stealing his victory and said the country should not be run by an illegitimate president, calling on the American people and the Supreme Court to save the country.
Photo:U.S. President Donald Trump raises his fist during a rally in support of Republican Senate candidates in Georgia on Dec. 5, 2009.
Trump also used the word “coup” for the first time to describe the current presidential election fraud, citing media reports. The tweet quoted a Trump supporter who commented in an interview with OANN: “People are upset, and they have a right to feel that way. Georgia not only supported Trump in 2016, it does now. Is this the only state in the Deep South that supported Biden? Have they lost their minds? This is going to escalate dramatically. This is a very dangerous time in our history. The truth is, our country is being stolen. A coup is happening before our eyes and the public can’t take this anymore.”
In a subsequent tweet, Trump also retweeted video of a teller inside a Joe State counting center scanning the same ballot multiple times.
New breakthrough for Trump camp, U.S. Senate to hold election investigation hearings
The U.S. Senate Homeland Security Committee will hold its first hearing on the 2020 election to investigate election irregularities. This is a new development for the Trump camp in the U.S. Congress.
Photo: Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin), chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin), chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, said the related hearings will help delve deeper into the election, “where a large percentage of the American public believes the 2020 election results are illegitimate because the apparent irregularities have not been fully vetted,” “For our country, this is not a situation that can last forever.”
The congressional hearing is scheduled for next Wednesday (Dec. 16).
Johnson said that many of the issues raised about the election will continue to be properly addressed through the court process and that the congressional “hearings are designed to identify the major issues in the election.”
Johnson noted that the point of the hearings is to reduce doubt in the election, “It’s not just about this election. It’s about future elections.”
In the interview, Johnson denounced the media’s practice of suppressing speech and noted that the media has caused serious election interference, more so than election interference in countries such as Russia.
Johnson said, “I mean, in fact, there are polls that have been conducted now, McLaughlin polls that show that 36 percent of Biden’s supporters have never heard the story of the Hunter Biden hard drivegate scandal because of the censorship and suppression. Once found, 13 percent said they would not vote for Biden. This would result in the loss of 4.6 percent of total Biden voters. Meaning Trump would win. “
“That’s how much influence social media and liberal-leaning media played in this election. Their interference was an order of magnitude greater than any foreign interference by Russia, the Chinese Communist Party or Iran.”
Implicated by female spy Fang Fang, U.S. congressman removed from House Intelligence Committee
U.S. Rep. Eric Swalwell, a Democrat, has been exposed as having an affair with a female Chinese Communist spy and being groomed by the Chinese Communist Party to support her rise to power.
On Wednesday afternoon, former New Jersey Republican Senate candidate Tricia Flanagan tweeted that Swalwell, a Democrat from California, had been dismissed from the House Intelligence Committee after being found to have ties to a Chinese Communist spy.
(Screenshot of Twitter page)
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) believes he should be removed from Congress outright.
Female spy Fang Fang’s Facebook page shows she may have just returned to the U.S., netizens speculate whether she was caught
A few days ago, the U.S. media suddenly surfaced Christine Fang, a Chinese spy who left the U.S. five years ago, which was quite surprising. Netizens then found that Fang Fang’s Facebook page was suddenly updated last month after many years, and it seems that she has just returned to the United States.
The netizens checked Fang Fang’s Facebook account (@christine.fang2) and found that she had just updated her avatar and cover photo on November 7, the fourth day after the US election. The account was last updated on July 5, 2014.
The updated avatar on November 7 shows her wearing a black dress with less coverage on top, three rings and a watch on her hand. After being complimented by her Facebook friend “Sam Hundel,” she also typed a thank you: “Thx Dr. Hundal.
On November 11, she changed her Facebook cover picture to a photo of the Capitol Hill ceiling. The photo was taken from a special angle, and was probably a selfie of her when she was just visiting Capitol Hill.
The incident sparked a heated debate on Twitter. Some people speculated, “Could she think that the Biden administration is in power and she can resume her old job?” Another netizen thought, “Should have caught the account, otherwise the congressman’s name appeared in the media in a dignified manner.”
Another netizen’s discovery seems to provide some basis for the above statement. The user pointed out that Fang Fang’s Facebook friends include a Chinese-American woman from Chongqing, China, “Beverly Hu”, who shared a photo of her with a white-headed man with Obama and Biden respectively. Fang Fang has also been photographed with the old man.
In one of the photos, “Beverly Hu” was hugged by Obama’s waist on one side, while the other side was interlocked with the white-headed old man. The netizens believe that this shows that their relationship is “not normal”.
What are the chances of a Trump reversal? Texas lawsuit of several possibilities
On Wednesday, the Texas lawsuit against Pennsylvania and four other states for unconstitutionality was filed less than a day before the defendants were required to respond (Thursday at 2 p.m. U.S. time). As of now, more than 17 states have followed Texas and joined the lawsuit.
This is a federal Supreme Court case, and the cases have been consolidated so that the Trump legal team does not need to go through the process state by state, but directly to the Supreme Court for consolidation. The Supreme Court’s decision is final.
Commentator Xue Jingzhong believes there are four possible outcomes to this case.
1, ruled that the defendant state overtime ballots and overtime counting invalid to December 4 at 0:00 am as the time point, the time point after the ballots and counting invalid, so to the deadline calculation, Trump won.
2, the verdict of 4 states election because of unconstitutional and invalidated so that the 4 states electoral votes Trump and Biden who can not get, who are not enough to take 270 votes situation. In this case, it is necessary to invoke the Twelfth Amendment to the Constitution, one state, one vote to elect the president. 50 states have at least 26 red states, Trump wins. Don’t worry about red states backfiring, because the relevant law states that those who vote on behalf of the state, red states must vote Republican and blue states must vote Democrat.
3, ruling four states because the election is illegal and invalid or fraudulent situation by the state legislature to decide the electoral college this is the Supreme Court on the surface of the maximum two parties are not offended or less offended by the program, that is, the ball kicked back to the state inside, let the state inside in accordance with the relevant laws, the state legislature to vote to decide the electoral college.
Because although the Republican Party is the majority party in the four states, but after all, the Republican Party is not a piece of iron, the Republican Party anti-Trump people are also many, the Democratic Party has the opportunity to operate. But no surprise, the state legislature should still make a decision in favor of Trump.
4, the judgment of insufficient evidence, the dismissal of the plaintiff’s lawsuit if Texas and other states were dismissed or ruled negative, then Trump’s hope of overturning the Supreme Court is basically dashed.
Xue Jingzhong believes that the most likely is the third. From the perspective of the Supreme Court, the decision of the governors and state governments of the four states to change the rules of the general election without going through the legislature (legislature) is untenable in terms of jurisprudence. Of course, there is negligence and even connivance of the state legislatures, and now that something has gone wrong, it is the state legislatures that should come out to clean up the mess and take responsibility. Therefore, it is reasonable and legitimate for the Supreme Court to throw this hot potato back to the state legislatures.
The governors and state governments will surely say, “Why didn’t you raise objections and stop this beforehand, but now you are here to make things worse? This is an internal state matter, it is not the Supreme Court’s business, the Supreme Court only to clarify the responsibility, point out a way to solve the problem and the way, as to how to solve, how the solution, it is not their business. After all, although the judges are divided into conservative and liberal, but the judges are representing the state, not party interests, and has nothing to do with who is appointed. No matter how you look at it, the outcome of this ruling is in the best interest of the federal Supreme Court itself.
What if there is a fourth ruling? If a fourth verdict does emerge, then the election could slide to the worst possible outcome and Trump would have to learn from Lincoln and take a thunderbolt.
Recent Comments