The sheer scale and blatant fraud of the 2020 election, along with the mainstream media’s blindness and censorship blackout, is a sign that America is in a critical state. Far from being a blow to any one person or party, it is destroying the institutional (electoral system) and moral (honesty, integrity) foundations of the United States of America, whose constitutional government is in jeopardy.
Rejecting fraudulent results, thoroughly investigating election fraud, and defending constitutional government are the only options for any patriot.
Trump now has the dual identity of being both the sitting President of the United States and a candidate for the next presidency. But regardless of the identity, it means that Trump is already at the forefront of defending the U.S. Constitution, and is the first defender.
From the perspective of a presidential candidate, the Trump camp has three fronts on which to fight.
The first front is conventional judicial litigation, from the contested state courts to the federal circuit courts and up to the federal Supreme Court.
The second front is in the contested state legislatures, where the state legislatures vote for the state’s electors by holding public hearings to expose election fraud in their states and deny fraudulent election results. These two fronts are now at war.
The third front, still in the making, is in Congress. The U.S. Congress has the final say as to which states’ electoral votes it will accept and which it will reject. Specifically, as Congressman Mo Brooks put it, when Congress certifies the election results on January 6, the states will submit them in alphabetical order, and if at any time a member of the House and a senator jointly object, the other states’ submissions will be stopped. Immediately afterwards, the House and Senate each debate for two hours, followed by a separate floor vote to accept or reject a state’s electoral vote submission.
If the highly fraudulent state’s submission is rejected, finally, the House of Representatives will decide who is President and the Senate will decide who is Vice President under the 12th Amendment to the federal Constitution. When the House of Representatives decides on the presidential candidate, the vote is cast by the state delegations, as opposed to the usual vote of legislators. Each state delegation has one vote, and the person who wins a majority of the state delegation votes will become president. The Republicans control at least 26 of the 50 state delegations, so it is to Trump’s advantage to win a majority of votes and win re-election.
However, from the perspective of an incumbent president, Trump can use his own interpretation of the Constitution as the basis for using his prerogative power. In the U.S. constitutional tradition, presidents use these powers to act unilaterally to resolve serious political disputes or manage crises, only to justify their actions to Congress and the American people after the fact. This demonstrates both the legitimacy of their exercise of power and the authority of their decisions.
Since the founding of the nation, presidents have had the power to resolve major disagreements. President Washington unilaterally declared his neutrality in the war between France and England in the early 1890s, despite the complete absence of an express provision in the Constitution authorizing him to do so. President Jefferson purchased the Louisiana Territory from France in 1803, although there was no express provision in the Constitution giving the federal government the power to acquire the territory. President Jefferson insisted on exercising his power to remove members of his cabinet, establishing the supreme authority of the President in the executive branch, even though the Constitution was silent on the power of removal. President Lincoln exercised such power that he was called a “constitutional dictator. On March 4, 1933, the day the president was sworn in, Roosevelt asked Congress to give the president “as great an executive power as in the event of an invasion,” a bold statement of his determination to lead the country and the government.
The 2020 election fraud has left the United States in a critical state, and it is absolutely necessary for President Trump to exercise the unique presidential powers granted by the Constitution.
On December 2, in what he called “what may be the most important speech I will ever give,” President Trump made it clear: “As President, my highest duty is to defend the laws and the Constitution of the United States, which is why I am determined to protect our electoral system, which now faces a Systemic Attack.”
The “systematic attack” on the U.S. election system is unprecedented, even more damaging than the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. It is now urgent that President Trump take decisive and effective emergency action to defend American constitutionalism, as the Chronicle feature – “Making Things Right: The Constitution Gives the President Special Powers” – states. -said.
Despite the “deep government” sabotage, there may be some key evidence within the Trump administration. For example, it has been reported that U.S. Special Forces have seized a number of servers in Frankfurt, Germany, that are linked to serious election fraud, and have engaged in a firefight with the CIA, resulting in casualties. From what has been disclosed so far, the “Frankfurt server” involved the CIA, the Chinese Communist Party, Iran, Serbia, Liechtenstein, and others. If it is not an empty rumor, it will help President Trump to take decisive measures.
There have been suggestions and expectations from various sectors of American society for President Trump to take decisive and effective emergency action.
For example, on December 1, the civic organization We the People Conference (WTPC) published a full-page ad in the Washington Times, referring to President Lincoln’s extraordinary actions to save the Union during the Civil War and comparing it to the “Civil War” that is dividing the United States today, calling on President Trump to exercise his special presidential powers as President Lincoln did.
In another example, former U.S. Air Force Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney argues that in response to the treasonous attempt to steal the election during the presidential election, a “five-step plan” could be implemented: declare a national emergency (President Trump issued this presidential decree in 2018); implement a counter-terrorism plan; and, in the case of the U.S. Senate, issue a “five-step plan. Riot Acts (to prevent and stop Antifa and BLM from creating mass chaos in major U.S. cities); declaration of martial law (in terms of population, martial law is not much different than a lockdown in response to a Chinese Communist virus epidemic); some secondary actions, including suspension of Habeas Corpus; initiation of court-martial trials.
In extraordinary times, extraordinary things are done and extraordinary achievements are made. President Trump is the fate of the United States, and it is time for him to go along with it.
Recent Comments