Today, I talked with former colleagues and old friends about the cooling-off period for divorce and the need for both parties to receive divorce papers, and the results of our discussion.
- We are pessimistic that these two settings will not necessarily reduce the divorce rate, and whether the number of divorces will decrease as a result. We are pessimistic about whether the number of divorces will decrease as a result. On the contrary, we think there will be an effect on the marriage rate, and those who want to get married should give it serious consideration.
- It is more damaging to the security of marital property and the protection of the weak in marriage, especially the latter.
- destroys easy access to divorce by consent and increases the time and procedural costs of litigating the marriage. It affects the free will of both parties to the marriage, and is now an administrative and legal means of imposing conditions that are typical of public power affecting private power.
- My friends, especially those who do divorce litigation, property division business volume has increased dramatically, today the number of consultations a day more than five times the previous day.
- To put it theoretically, the law is an expression of some (ahem) will, and the law is not just amended or created to solve superficial problems, such as divorce rates, but also to solve deeper problems. To put it bluntly, isn’t the creation of this provision a combination of things? Is it an aid to some deeper problem? For example, the population, pension, and basic population benefits are riddled with holes ……
The above is pure nonsense and small group discussion, does not represent any personal opinion, does not represent formal legal interpretation.
Further reading: @WuYueShanWen.
On the matter of “divorce cooling-off period,” the thing to say, you have said, this kind of nonsense is not worth the extra keyboard.
In fact, the treatment of lower fertility expectations, the population decline, blocking the divorce is not the solution, but more importantly, make people want to get married, childbirth.
Marriage has the benefit of naturally want two people to get a license to live it.
For example, in terms of tax relief, each developed country has a lot of experience in this regard.
There are more and stronger tax breaks for couples living together.
The more children you raise, even if you don’t give a subsidy, the more tax credits you can deduct, and the more children you have, the more tax deductions you can take.
Loans for personal consumption, such as buying a house or a car, with reduced interest rates.
If you have children out of wedlock or single-parent families, don’t set a threshold for hukou, and subsidize them in addition to tax breaks and other exemptions.
If you say there are such measures abroad, why has the fertility rate dropped so much? This problem is actually related to social development and cultural traditions, and our society has not yet reached that level.
The desire to have children in Chinese society is not suppressed by culture, but by the cost of childbirth.
If you increase the cost of divorce, you are indirectly increasing the cost of marriage, which is really stupid.
Recent Comments