A few days ago, the child custody dispute case between Zheng Shuang and Zhang Heng was pronounced. Zhang Heng posted on Weibo that the US court awarded him the right to win the independent decision on child custody and revealed that the court gave Zheng Shuang a small amount of time to raise the child, saying that he would like to believe that Zheng Shuang will do his duty and responsibility as a good mother in the future and let the child grow up without regrets.
Zheng Shuang’s eldest posted
Some netizens broke the news that Zhang Heng’s friends claim that Zheng Shuang has started to find a place for psychiatric treatment and also needs to go for parenting classes. The company’s main goal is to provide the best possible service to its customers.
The company’s first name is “GG”, and it’s a very good example of how to get the most out of your life. The move also comforted many fans who still support Zheng Shuang, leaving messages in reply, “Let her take good care of herself, we are always there.”
The case of Zheng Shuang Zhang Heng for custody was recently sentenced in the U.S. District Court in Denver, Colorado. The court ruled that Zhang Heng has the right to make custody decisions for the two children, that Zhang Heng has the right to get passports for the children without Zheng Shuang’s consent or signature, and that Zheng Shuang got a small portion of the parenting time, and that she will have fixed parenting time based on the ruling. However, the verdict did not rule on whether Zheng Shuang needs to pay support. In the verdict, the judge expressed disappointment with both of them for failing to put the child’s interests completely above those of the parents and pushing all important decisions regarding child support to the court.
Ruling: Zheng has parenting time and the court sets a detailed schedule
The court made a determination on the parentage of Zhang Heng and Zheng Shuang after collecting multiple evidence and information. According to the verdict, Zhang Heng was the only parent the children knew, and for almost 18 months, Zhang Heng was the primary caregiver, and he alone, ensured that they came into the world safely, into a warm home, and that the children’s needs were met. Zheng, on the other hand, the children have only met a few times, and at best, she is a dispensable person, at worst, she is a stranger, but definitely not a mother.
This part of the disclosed verdict information is not the whole truth. According to attorney Liu Longzhu, a registered attorney in the U.S. federal court, custody in the U.S. is divided into custody decisions (Legal custody) and custody time (Physical custody), and Zhang Heng has the custody decisions, but Zheng Shuang has a portion of the custody time.
On this premise, the court determined that Zhang Heng became the primary resident of the two children based on consideration of their parental relationship and status, and that the children would go with their father if he left the United States. In addition, the court developed a parenting schedule based on the actual situation, which was divided into two phases, starting from May 24, Zheng Shuang had three days a week to take care of the children, respectively on Monday, Wednesday and Friday’s, from 10:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.; in the second phase Zheng Shuang’s time to take care of the children on Monday and Wednesday remained the same, while Friday increased and could be from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.; and had the right to extend the parenting time with the The right to extend parenting time as the relationship with the child eases, provided that Zheng attends six months of one-on-one professional therapy to help her mental emotional stability, develop a relationship with the child, and parenting coping skills.
The rest of the child’s time is vested in the father. The parents must complete a parenting course and submit the relevant certificates to the court within 60 days of the entry of the judgment.
In terms of parenting decisions, Zhang Heng has the right to make separate parenting decisions, however, the mother needs to be notified within 72 hours of any major decisions he makes for the children.
In addition, Zhang Heng has the right to obtain any government documents for the children, including passports, without Zheng Shuang’s consent or signature.
The verdict did not address the matter of alimony too much, and the verdict did not mention whether Zheng was required to pay alimony and in what amount.
Based on: ineffective communication between the two sides, both discouraging the child from sharing his feelings with the other
For such a ruling, the verdict details the analysis of the investigation of both sides. First, the court found that both parents were at fault in that neither of them could put the child’s interests first, and neither encouraged the child to share love, affection, etc. with the other, let alone respect and communicate effectively with each other.
The court found that after her relationship with Zhang Heng ended, she tried to prevent the children from being born or was willing to be adopted, and when they were born, she “put her head in the sand” and took no responsibility for them, nor did she rearrange their lives, but continued to work. She did so without regard for the fact that she had voluntarily created two lives and had taken on the burden of life to do so. It was only after the PR failure in January 2021, which had a serious impact on her career, that she took steps to try to intervene in her children’s lives.
Now, Jung’s side has offered to implement an intensive parenting plan to become a mother to her children simply by spending time with them, a parenting plan that the court did not agree with because of one of the parenting phases that interfered with the children’s lunch breaks.
The court, on the other hand, found that on Zhang Heng’s side, the court understood his concerns when he learned that the woman wanted to abort the children or give them up for adoption, however, Zhang Heng currently seemed unable to move past the past and put aside the failed relationship and other personal issues between the parties to forgive each other and build bridges between the children and their mother, instead hiding from the children over time and being reluctant for the mother to meet with the children. He also refused to acknowledge what role the mother should play in the children’s lives.
The court found that so far, Jung had failed in her role as mother, and had not shown the court that she had the confidence to want to be a parent to the children and to devote her life to it; the father had made limited efforts to do so.
There was no more effective communication about the past, other than the parties agreeing to have a child together. And today, there may be increased conflict between the parties if there is joint decision-making in ruling on parenting decisions.
Lawyer Liu Longzhu said that Zheng Shuang and Zhang Heng’s fight for custody is also more influential in the U.S. The 30-page verdict is relatively rare, which shows how meticulous the court is about the case, and the judge in this case, who is also a mother, is overwhelmed with shock and regret. Click to view>> [Zheng Shuang Zhang Heng fight for custody 30-page verdict full text]
Review: the court found Zheng Shuang’s emotional instability performance disturbing
Zhang Heng Zheng Shuang surrogacy and the fight for custody, as well as the subsequent business disputes, yin and yang contract, etc., continue to ferment in the community, things have developed to this day can be described as a land of chicken feathers, lawsuits have won and lost, but no one is a winner.
The two once had more love, now there is more hate, but unfortunately, the two little lives have become their forever cut off can not get rid of the association. Until now, they still can’t explain why they chose to surrogate two children in the first place.
According to the verdict, Zheng Shuang wanted two pig babies, but after their relationship broke down, Zheng Shuang unilaterally communicated with the surrogacy agency to try to terminate the pregnancy or send it for adoption, and the agency was ridiculous about Zheng Shuang’s attitude, saying straight out that “we are talking about a baby, not a new product that can be returned.”
The company’s main goal is to provide the best possible solution to the problem. The woman assigned a lawyer to communicate with him because Zheng Shuan was “too busy”.
However, when the matter was exposed, Zheng Shuan’s side was much more positive, while Zhang Heng began to avoid it, refusing to contact the child’s mother and discouraging any relationship between her and the child. There was also a lawsuit involving a $20 million deal between the two in the country, further escalating the animosity between the two sides.
As for Zhang Heng’s allegations against Zheng Shuang in the area of mental health, the court found that she was emotionally unstable and engaged in some disturbing behavior after the birth of the child, such as sending pictures of her father with a haircut.
Thus, while the court found Zhang Heng to be a responsible father, it did not fully side with him.
The verdict reads that during most of the years 2020 to 2021, both parents often fought online over previous relationships and matters, while Zhang Heng as the father did not talk about the children, how they were doing and how much they needed to see their mother.
This is enough to show that both parties are immature and unable to put the needs of their children before their own, much less carefully consider what these two lives mean.
Recent Comments