Recently, Xinhua News Agency, People’s Daily and other official media criticized the “experiential show-off video” for deviating from mainstream values, and named a netizen “Big LOGO Eating Down Beijing”.
Big LOGO has filmed videos such as “300 yuan a couple of Wagyu beef steaks”, “3,700 yuan afternoon tea”, “75,000 yuan for a night in the presidential suite”, “1,990,000 yuan for a monthly birth”, and “1,990,000 yuan for a monthly birth”. “The core selling point is “expensive”, and thus arousing the curiosity of the audience.
It is reported that the big LOGO himself is not a rich generation, but only this “paper and gold” routine to harvest the short video traffic.
After being criticized by the official media, Big LOGO publicly apologized to the public, and also made three explanations, and has deleted a large number of videos from his channel.
file
But many netizens believe that, as “food saving action”, the official has no right to restrain the content of the creators in the name of positive energy, and these high-priced consumption originally existed in reality, the video authors just take the audience experience, why a thing only allowed to do not say it?
@ChenShengDaWang: Look at the hot search, big LOGO video showing off wealth was named and criticized, a little shocked.
The big LOGO started out as a civilian food explorer and later turned to high-end life experiences, either as a rich kid or a big boss, or an ordinary person. It is better to say that he is showing off his wealth than to say that he is taking a peek at it.
Every restaurant and hotel he goes to is real, with clear prices, no distortion and exaggeration, no disinformation and fiction. The price is not set by him, the store is not opened by him, how wrong is his.
Obviously for so many years, so many high-end consumer places, thousands of customers, a constant stream. If a thing is only allowed to do, but not allowed to say, then there must be a problem.
And it must not be your problem.
Such a harsh naming and shaming, is it afraid that ordinary people will learn badly when they see something luxurious and high-class, or is it that ordinary people should not know that there are those places?
The big LOGO immediately apologized, but of course he had no choice. Then what is the standard for not being extravagant. Can stars still use tens of thousands of dollars of bags, bloggers can still do luxury unboxing. Those really rich people will therefore be hard and simple, eating dry noodles every day.
Not. People have good days. It’s just that you shouldn’t see it.
Cnbeta｜Accused of ostentatious wealth, netizen anchor Big LOGO apologizes, “will be more careful to choose the subject matter”
The newest and most popular of these is the “The New York Times”. “The video will be more carefully chosen in the future.
The big LOGO in its account “big LOGO eat down Beijing” released a video response, said to all the recent media on its comments and suggestions are grateful, humbly accept. “The ‘Presidential Suite’ video was filmed last year, but we realized that this kind of content might cause some bad guidance to the society, so we took the initiative to delete it, and we have not chosen similar expensive hotel topics after the year. “
img
In addition, the big LOGO said that the original intention of the video is only to share an experience, and did not want to guide people to consume those too expensive things, “in many videos clearly said that many things are not worth trying”, “the future will be more careful to choose the video subject matter “.
On April 15, Xinhua News Agency official microblogging to # Xinhua News Agency named some short video platform to show off the wind of wealth # as the topic, the current short video platform in a haircut will cost 10,000 yuan, a night in the “presidential suite” to 75,000, spend 1.99 million yuan to “sit in the moon “Nowadays, various short video platforms are flooded with a large number of ‘show-off’ short videos with luxury life as the selling point, and the wind of extravagance is getting stronger and stronger.” “Some short video creators are obsessed with the pursuit of traffic and profit, so that social responsibility ‘stand aside’, the frequent display of paper and gold content corrupt the social climate,” and said, “This wind of extravagance should be managed! “
On April 16, Xinjing News reporter contacted the main body of the relevant video accounts, in which a staff member of the Netflix “Big LOGO Eat Down Beijing” responded that “those videos have been deleted years ago,” and said that the future dissemination of content will have The content will be adjusted in the future.
The following comments were collected from the Internet.
I was attacked by the strawberry flavor heavy fist: afraid that we look at more to find the original themselves growing in the ground.
The owner of the fruit store L: It is because of the rich who explored the rich.
Aries427: “Poverty is not socialism”-some leader once said.
Super old x: this is not a cover-up?
It is not said that there is no clothing: you have money can, live a luxurious life is no problem. But can not muffled, eat meat don’t biaji mouth, so that the majority of people with cell phones can not drink soup how to look at it? Really do not know how to do things! Must be educated education. There is money and shut up is virtue ah. Not deceitful will not let you spend is what?
Zhao Lao Kuan: low profile, learn from others mineral water bottles filled with Maotai.
Ti-Ri: the anchor is to present this lifestyle to the civilian public, not they show off their wealth, but this life of great wealth has always existed, just before we do not know. Now this lifestyle, known to the public, is moving the cake of who needs to be so sanctioned these anchors.
Drunken Breeze 963258: It’s not fictional, why do you need to apologize?
I changed my name just not to let you find: ahahaha, in my case 2688 a bowl of noodles and 6 yuan a bowl of noodles are used to fill the stomach, they are paper and gold their, not in my way, they can not guide me, and I have no money.
Gamma Cat: I’ve only seen similar store videos, I personally think there is nothing wrong with that kind of video, I a working class, can not afford to eat pork can not see the pig running? This thing is not fictional, so that the pricing is so high is the concept of healthy consumption, I look at it is not healthy.
Nantong L: boring, even the right to know?
Doraemon’s big pocket y: how to ease the class conflict? Just blindfold the grassroots.
Rabbit called big hot spicy: this is showing off the rich? This is the paper drunk? …… not experienced to see also can not?
Aziz big cat: to avoid generating instability even if also a little also not.
Xu a Xian 2109: you can have high-end consumption, but can not promote, the understanding of this is the meaning.
Hope Jinling: If something is allowed to happen in the real world, but not allowed to be recounted, then he is actually tampering with history.
Monday morning: just afraid that the people know that the original rich people are so spend money
Do not eat pills of Rika: ordinary people which can see the life of the Dragon Kingdom.
Guangdong Feng Qing’an: How is “showing off wealth” defined? Who has the right to define it? What are the criteria? Is “showing off your wealth” a crime? Whose rights are violated? What are the responsibilities and costs?
Nobuts-: just don’t want us to see the gap between the rich and the poor?
Zoe Yanxi: The person who photographed it should not have photographed it.
Youyuan ____sky: can not let the fart know ah.
The cold mountain soft water 2012: this slowly again and decades ago the same. When our parents’ generation thought that the big leaders and we, like us, eat chaff every day, who did not know that people every day chicken, duck, fish and meat drink Maotai. But we can not see it.
Small fish LOVE eternal love: In fact, I really think that like these places where they do not obviously do not take advantage of even the so-called central media criticism do not have to apologize first, and can even be polite, not condescending dialogue. // D0CT0R_WHO: You’re a bit of a foreign guest. Not only the central media will not give you an apology, the short video platform will immediately block you.
A strip of Myman: Damn this news on the look of my very angry, we can not live this life to see the next are still not okay, and what is wrong with people, you have to sour to see what is sour, really big reporting times.
dgghjufv: snow country train.
Next door to the village of the little flower cat: it is clear that those who are rich and unkind do not want you poor people know how windy and luxurious they live, afraid to cause class conflicts, after all, the poor could have endured the darkness and poverty, see these luxurious life only to find that the original rich people’s happiness is that we can not imagine when the helpless, is afraid that we the poor people are not willing to hate the rich inside…
Follow the good microblogging: want me to do a few issues of the life of the poor! In see what they say. // Wind Ren finally have a cat: that you disappear even faster …… last year on the comprehensive poverty eradication ah brother dei.
Didn’t have to fill in the feelings machine 0722: I read a lot, think really no dazzle, in addition to the part of advertising, speech quite real an up owner.
florence_sunset: There is a demand for this kind of video to have a market, this kind of video can fire, side by side to prove that ordinary people on this class of people’s lives and consumption is a great curiosity, so itself shooting this kind of video bloggers nothing wrong, the audience group is quite large.
Yao son: angry! I’m poor and can’t let me see how the rich live?
Recent Comments