A big distorted face, a hoarse voice, an uneducated look, and a star-studded media, this is how Swedish “environmental girl” Greta Thunberg has looked on stage since her debut.
With the full force of Western politicians and media, she has gained numerous glory and honors, and has become the idol of many teenagers. For the young girl personally, she has gained weight and her family is said to be strict vegetarians.
It was exactly two years from August 20, 2018, when she skipped school to hold a sign at the Swedish Parliament building in Stockholm, to August 20, 2020, when she “educated” Angela Merkel for 90 minutes in the German government meeting room.
Then, she announced on the online platform that she will return to school and prepare for university next year. As for what university, she does not have to worry about, the United States and Europe are lining up many famous schools to invite her face to study.
Her mother said she could see carbon dioxide in the air with her naked eyes, so some European netizens teased her that she should be called “St. Greta”. Gretta”, her icon should be everywhere.
On March 30, the University of Winchester erected a bronze statue of her on campus at a cost of about £24,000 in recognition of her contribution to the environment. No matter how unhappy some students are, the university is still proud of it.
On April 15, the BBC also released a video interview with her, as if she were an environmental expert.
However, as a global environmental leader, Greta has fallen into the hands of the Japanese this time.
On April 13, the Japanese government shocked the international community with its decision to discharge Fukushima nuclear effluent into the sea. Greta remained silent as if she had turned a blind eye to this act of the Japanese, which seriously damaged global environmental protection.
She copied a news report and retweeted a criticism of the Japanese government by Greenpeace under constant questioning by netizens, without any attitude from herself. This is a “squeak” and continues to play dead.
In the past, she was able to jump up and down on the biggest issues, but now, she is not taking such a big event as nuclear sewage discharge into the sea seriously, which makes the netizens full of doubts.
What is the problem of her so perverse behavior? There are several possibilities.
First, after her parents (team) successfully packaged her as an “environmental leader”, she has a great ability to guide public opinion, for a certain matter, Greta speak out or not can become a deal, the Japanese gave a large amount of “hush money” in advance, the deal done.
Second, she is a political puppet of the West, and environmental protection is a political stick to be used, and through Greta, the West’s environmental discourse is greatly increased. She must be completely subservient to the West’s political needs, and the connivance with Japan is exactly what the West needs politically.
three, that Greta is a cautious person who is trying to memorize the periodic table of elements and does not want to take a stand before she has reached the level of Madame Curie
Fourth, she is in love, and women in love have zero IQ, so people should leave her alone.
If you don’t understand, ask, so Chen Weihua, the EU bureau chief of China Daily, asked under her tweet, “Do you think this is acceptable? Gretta?” Thousands of netizens liked Chen Weihua’s question.
You can be sure that more and more netizens will see her face clearly, and the logic is actually very simple: whoever packages her out is the one she serves.
In 2018 and 2019, she claims to be just a simple environmentalist, and her parents say that everything has nothing to do with politics, and they want people to focus on environmental protection and not other aspects.
Is it really not related to politics? After having an extremely strong public influence, in October 2020, before the US election, she tweeted, “Damn! Take action and get everyone to vote for Biden.” Also retweeting anti-Trump tweets, she urged American fans not to vote for Trump.
Greta is the darling of the American establishment and mainstream European politics, but does that have much to do with the environment? When the environmental discourse is in their hands, it’s a disaster for developing countries.
It is clear from the Japanese nuclear waste that Gretar and the team behind it do not care about the environment, but rather want to use the “environmental” label to do unspeakable things.
The emergence of Greta, how many silent dedication to the cause of environmental protection to deprive the honor? And easily robbed them of the fruits of their hard work.
Has she ever planted a tree? Has she ever healed a piece of sand? Cleaned up a meter of river? Nothing, there is only the distorted face full of stage effects in the show everywhere.
Eat it than pigs can eat, but also told the world to stop economic development, she certainly did not suffer the kind of African children hungry, and do not care about it all.
Just say no to environmental protection, who will, the problem is that the average person simply can not get her behind the media resources.
Her “success” will only make more kids learn to be opportunistic and avoid school. One person skipping class will be punished by the teacher, but a group of people skipping class will be called “climate action” and the teacher will have to smile.
The United States is now preparing to launch its own “environmental teenager”, the same age as Greta.
Jerome Foster, who started skipping class in 2019, went to the White House every week to hold a sign calling attention to the climate crisis for 58 weeks, learning from Greta in style.
Then his dad took him to New York to make a scene about the environment, and the book didn’t even need to be read; he had an extra trump card over Greta – environmental justice for people of color. So, he too took the UN podium.
He finally “made it” too, and a few days ago, Biden recruited him to the White House climate advisory panel, where all the other officials, experts and scholars were over 40, and he was only 18.
Biden used such a truant teenager environmental protection teenager as one of the presidential climate advisers, this and know the king with disinfectant to prevent the virus is essentially different?
Greta seems to be to meet the rival, the American-made may be more functional than the Swedish-made. However, it is no coincidence that Jerome Foster is also silent about the Japanese discharging nuclear effluent into the sea.
As long as people are more observant and not confused by their rhetoric, they can see that this “double standard environmental protection” has always existed.
In 2019, she did not see the burning California forest fires; in 2020, she did not see the super mountain fires in Australia, nor did she raise her voice; in Japan, she did not react to the tanker accident that polluted the sea of Mauritius, and in this case, the nuclear effluent incident, she played a repeater, is there any surprise?
For European politicians and media, what matters is this flag, this idol, which is a multi-party joint deception.
Western opinion media, for the most part, are tacitly approving of Japan’s discharge of nuclear wastewater into the sea, and this is the most difficult part for Greta, who has no other choice but to run away, and this time to admit it.
She and her parents are realists, just playing the role of environmental idealists. Calling out Trump, in line with mainstream political tendencies in Europe and the United States, can bring her reputation.
But if she scolds the media for not condemning Japan for discharging nuclear waste water? That would be doing more harm than good, and the benefits would outweigh the losses, because she is relying on the Western media to tout to get those benefits.
A tool of the people, but seen by some as an awakening of environmental awareness, to follow the West’s anti-intellectualism? Being led by the nose by these things and self moving, then don’t even want to eat meat in the future.
Who broke the Kyoto Protocol, who withdrew from the Paris Climate Agreement? Anyone with a normal IQ knows where the greatest resistance to protecting the human environment comes from? But the Greta’s, packaged by the West, are targeting the developing world as the main target.
When the environmental line of sight is diverted by the West, the result is the connivance of the unscrupulous Japanese.
Greta has shown her true form this time, not as an environmentalist, but as an accomplice to the destruction of the human environment, how dare you?
Recent Comments