Xie Tian: The new U.S. military strategy remote control can hit the Chinese Communist Party military power hard

Todd Harrison, director of the Defense Budget and Space Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a U.S. think tank with an international security program, said in a new study that the U.S. military’s repositioning of remotely piloted combat systems is of great significance to the future development of U.S. military forces. Todd Harrison, director of the Defense Budget and Space Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), pointed out in a recent study that the U.S. military’s repositioned remotely piloted combat system is of great significance to the future development of U.S. military forces. Dr. Xie Tian, a professor at the Aiken School of Business at the University of South Carolina, said that the new strategy of the U.S. military could be decisive in a possible future confrontation with the Chinese Communist Party’s military, whose millions of troops would instantly suffer heavy damage.

Dr. Xie Tian told the station that the issue of military-based strategy involves political issues and economic issues, and that Remotely Crewed Systems (RCS) can be a force multiplier, which can increase the combat power of the military without increasing the number of soldiers, or reduce the number of soldiers without reducing combat capability. Among other things, remotely controlled aircraft, as well as UAVs, are already heavily equipped for the U.S. military, and the cost of personnel to use and operate them is far less than that of manned vehicles.

The new military system, which is called “remotely controlled systems,” which we translate as “remotely controlled systems,” is a repositioning that I think is very significant for the future of the U.S. military, and it’s basically a comprehensive shift to an unmanned system. It is basically a comprehensive shift to an unmanned system. If you can rely on these machines he can control the war from afar, then this is basically very little casualties, which is very beneficial to the United States. One is that it can become a multiplier of military power, military power will expand very quickly; and another is that it can increase combat capability without increasing the number of people, or reduce the number of soldiers without reducing combat capability; then this makes too much sense for the United States, right?

Dr. Sheeda said that it is more cost-effective and economical for Americans to use machines, so the front-line commanders of the U.S. military are now beginning to demand a lot of these unmanned devices that are remotely controlled in the rear, and the pace of the U.S. military toward unmanned aircraft, unmanned ships, unmanned submarines, unmanned space planes, and various unmanned combat systems will be greatly accelerated.

There is no doubt that once the U.S. starts to do this across the board, the U.S. mobilization capability, the mobilization of war is very fast, and this will basically change the state of warfare in the future. Now, the U.S. defense budget has been growing, right, and there’s a figure that it grew by 12 percent from ’16 to ’19. But the numbers of the military, the numbers of military personnel have not grown with it. The number of military personnel, the Navy is 5 percent, the Army is only 1.9 percent. You could say a lot of that has actually been spent on weapons systems. And the next step to the U.S. fiscal year 2025 in the purchase of those, inside it 11 medium, large long-range cruisers and six super-large long-range cruisers, are unmanned. The U.S. Navy plans to deploy 140 to 200 long-range unmanned submarines. That is, soon, soon the future of the United States, of course, it will not all at once transition to unmanned above, but soon will reach at least a quarter of the unmanned, so this is a very noteworthy trend.

Dr. Xie Tian believes that the U.S. military is about to enter a new era, with the most advanced robotic weapons systems, in the sky, sea, land, space, a comprehensive attack; and the “soldiers” operating these weapons systems, in fact, are thousands of miles away, ten thousand miles away from the U.S. mainland, in those thick concrete and radiation protection weapons under the protection of the The “soldiers” who operate these weapons systems are actually thousands and thousands of miles away on American soil, in the underground bunkers protected by thick concrete and radiation-protected weapons, operating these steel machines from a distance through satellites and fiber optics, to fight against the enemies of the United States, such as the millions of flesh and blood of the Chinese Communist Party.

Dr. Xie Tian also said that one of the military tactics that the Chinese Communist Party relies on is the human sea tactics, the ship sea tactics, the swarm tactics of drones, and even driving civilian populations and fishermen’s fishing boats as human shields to block artillery fire and shrapnel for the Chinese Communist Army. Going forward, the U.S. military’s new strategy could be decisive in a possible future confrontation with the Chinese Communist Party’s military, whose seemingly growing military strength instantly becomes unstoppable.

Why does it think it’s so powerful now? It thinks it has the largest army in the world, right? But it still can’t keep up with the technology level. It has no hope of catching up with the United States, and in fact it can’t even catch up with Russia, maybe Japan, maybe the Ukraine, from which it stole a lot of technology. Now, the Chinese Communist Party still relies on its human tactics, using this to deter others, when the Chinese Communist Party fights with the United States, it does not see the American soldiers, they are likely to face a large number of war machines, that your human body and this body of steel to fight, then the Chinese Communist Party must be hopeless, right? The Chinese Communist Party’s millions of troops are very scary, but now it may not seem scary at all, that is, in front of the U.S. Army’s fully modernized unmanned systems may be nothing in the future.