Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director general of the World health Organization (WHO), during a news conference at WHO headquarters in Geneva, Feb. 24, 2020.
The WHO expert panel released its report on the investigation of the origin of the virus on Tuesday (March 30), followed by a rare choking of the Chinese Communist Party by WHO Secretary General Tedros Ghebreyesus, who even said further investigation of the outbreak was needed. Experts believe that the WHO origin of the Epidemic is very unreasonable in order, and Tan Desai change of tone has a variety of possibilities.
Lin Xiaoxu: The WHO report’s ranking of the possibility of the origin of the epidemic is very unreasonable
According to the report, the panel of experts proposed four possibilities for the origin of the epidemic, the highest probability is that the virus host infected the second animal, the latter then infected humans, rated as “likely to very likely” (likely to very likely); followed by direct transmission of bats to humans, rated as The second is direct human transmission by bats, which is rated as “likely”.
The third type of transmission is through frozen Food, rated as “possible but not likely” (possible but not likely); as for the leakage through the laboratory is rated as “extremely (unlikely).
In response, Dr. Lin Xiaoxu, an American virologist and former laboratory director of the Department of Virus at the U.S. Army Research Institute, told the Epoch Times that the WHO report’s political bias far outweighed its scientific rigor, and made serious errors in ranking several possibilities. In particular, it is unreasonable to rank the laboratory leak as highly unlikely, almost to the exclusion.
Lin Xiaoxu said that the evidence from various sources over the past year or so shows that the unique characteristics of the virus genetic combination, as well as some epidemiological features can be seen, the possibility of the virus spreading from an animal to a human, relatively speaking, is also lower than the possibility of laboratory leakage.
According to Lin, it is unreasonable for the WHO panel of experts to simply rule out the possibility of a laboratory leak based on the data provided by official Chinese Communist scientists during their one- or two-week visit to China.
He pointed out that the characteristics of dozens of viruses that Seattle scientist Stephen crane analyzed in a statistical way, as well as the epidemiological aspects of this, considered together, and came to the conclusion that there is a 99 percent chance of a laboratory leak. “Whether it is China, or other countries in the past decades of virus research, researchers are infected by laboratory samples, viruses cultured inside, from Time to time, and this possibility is relatively high.”
Frozen food transmission sorted before lab leak accused of helping Chinese Communist Party shrug it off
According to Lin, the WHO report ranked frozen food transmission ahead of the possibility of a lab leak, which also doesn’t make much sense. “This is basically an official argument by the Chinese Communist Party to dump the blame.” The production and processing of frozen food has the potential to be contaminated with this virus, and further spread must have the prerequisite that there is already a corresponding pandemic outbreak in the source. But in late 2019 and early 2020, no outbreak has been seen in any place where the spread of this frozen food is associated.
“It is evident that the spread of the virus through frozen foods is, at best, a possible way to explore the further spread of the virus, but not a possibility to trace the source of the virus. This World Health Organization ranking is not reasonable in this regard.”
He said, “This possibility of transmission from bats or intermediate hosts to people, so far the Chinese Communist Party has not officially provided any animal samples, especially samples from intermediate animal hosts that have tested positive for COVID-19, and this in itself is and is highly unusual.”
He further analyzed that the civet was found to be the intermediate host within 4 months of the Sars (SARS) outbreak, and the camel was found to be the intermediate host within 9 months of the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome outbreak in 2015. Now more than a dozen months later, no animal intermediate host has been found in the case of a large concentrated outbreak of the CCP virus, which also suggests that this possibility is relatively low.
“There are quite a few errors in the WHO’s ranking of the likelihood of the origin of the virus.” Lin Xiaoxu said, “The independence of this report itself is also quite questionable.”
According to current affairs commentator Tang Jingyuan, this WHO report is meaningless, the report was actually issued under the manipulation of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and the CCP government clearly interfered in the whole investigation process. Purely from the academic perspective of tracing the origin of the epidemic, its political value is much higher than its scientific value, and its credibility is very low and has little meaning.
Tandse chokes on rare Chinese Communist Party expert: multiple possibilities
After the WHO report was questioned by many parties, WHO Secretary General Tan Desai said in a rare case, the expert team encountered difficulties in accessing the original data, and even mentioned that although the report alleged that the most unlikely to leak from the laboratory, but will consider all the possibilities, the report is only the beginning, not the end, “we need to conduct more research in a number of areas, which will require further field visits “.
Wu Te, an independent media commentator on the mainland, believes that he should be under pressure from the international community, especially from the U.S. side, before revealing the situation during the investigation of the origin of the virus experts to obtain data obstructed by the Chinese Communist Party, so as to highlight the independence of the WHO, a little scolding to help the taste of a big favor.
Wu Te also pointed out that the content of the WHO investigation report itself is actually nothing new, “cold chain transmission”, “laboratory leakage” may be very low assertion looks like in and mud, neither want to offend the Chinese Communist Party nor other countries in the international community.
Recent Comments