On March 30, the World health Organization (WHO) released a joint report on the origin of the new coronavirus, which lists several possibilities for the origin of the virus and concludes that the possibility of a laboratory leak is “extremely remote.
In response to the report, 14 governments, including the United States, Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Israel and Japan, signed a joint statement expressing “common concern. The statement noted that “the international expert investigation into the origin of the new coronavirus has been severely delayed and access to complete raw data and samples has been lacking.”
On the same day, WHO Director-General Tandezai said in the release that WHO experts were experiencing difficulties in obtaining raw data and said, “I am not convinced that this assessment is broad enough and that we need further data and research to draw stronger conclusions.”
Tandse’s statement drew media attention, with some reports calling his performance “surprising. On the face of it, instead of urging everyone to accept the report’s arguments, which clearly favor the CCP, Tandezai is criticizing Beijing for not being cooperative enough. Why has he suddenly changed his tune?
In fact, from the beginning, the WHO “investigation” was not well received by the outside world, as it was a year after the outbreak and there was little “on-the-ground” value in visiting places like the South China Seafood Market. In addition, the Chinese Communist Party set a condition: WHO must conduct a joint investigation with China. According to media reports, several experts involved in the “investigation” disclosed that what they saw was already prepared by the Chinese side and that they had no access to more original materials.
To use an analogy, in a criminal investigation, the top suspect leads the evidence collection, identification and report writing, and the final conclusion excludes the suspect. So, how credible is such an “investigation”? No wonder some people think that WHO and the Chinese Communist Party are playing a double game.
The reasons for Tandse’s change of attitude in favor of the CCP are as follows: first, the CCP and the WHO had too much of a show, and the results were too biased in favor of the CCP; second, on March 29, the Associated Press disclosed a draft of the WHO report that it had obtained, raising doubts in advance; third, on March 28, U.S. Secretary of State Blinken told the media that he had doubts about Beijing’s “help in writing” the report. Fourth, several media outlets again focused on the ambiguous relationship between the WHO and the CCP, rehashing many old scores, including a photo of Tan Desai rushing to shake hands with Xi Jinping.
As a result, WHO and the CCP are once again in the limelight. At this point, a slight change of face by Tan Desai may help calm public anger and delay the process. Anyway, the United States has returned to the WHO and promised to inject funds, Tan probably wants to “change” to break out. Perhaps this move was made with the consent of the Chinese Communist Party.
The outbreak began in China, and the Chinese authorities’ concealment of information and delays in fighting the Epidemic caused an even greater disaster worldwide. Therefore, the international community should not only work to clarify the source of the virus, but also thoroughly investigate the Chinese regime’s concealment of the disease and the WHO’s poor cooperation with the Chinese Communist Party.
Between March and June of last year, a number of countries issued calls for accountability and claims against the CCP, followed by strong reports and bills. For example, on April 6, the Henry Jackson Society (HJS), a British diplomatic think tank, released a study entitled: “New Crown (CCP) Virus Reparations: Assessing China’s (CCP) Potential Culpability and Legal Response Pathways,” which concluded that China (CCP) could have reduced the impact of the New Crown virus (CCP virus) on the global economy.
On June 15 of last year, the U.S. House of Representatives Investigative Panel released its “Minority Interim Report on the Origins of the COVID-19 Global Pandemic, Including the Role of the CCP and the WHO,” which made three recommendations: replacing the WHO leadership, launching an international investigation into the CCP’s concealment of information during the early stages of the pandemic, and reforming the International Health Regulations.
The situation was unfavorable to both the Chinese Communist Party and the WHO as the U.S. withdrew from the WHO, leaving it facing a huge loss of funding. However, as the White House changed hands and the U.S. returned to the WHO, the CCP continued to enlist people with masks and vaccines, boasting of its success in fighting the epidemic and exaggerating the epidemic in Europe and the U.S., leading to a weakening of the momentum to blame the CCP. However, the CCP knows that it cannot evade its own responsibility for the spread of the epidemic. Therefore, using the WHO report to clear its name is an important move.
The reason the CCP manipulated the WHO was to use its status and aura of “science” in an attempt to dispel questions and suppress further investigations. This is also the purpose of the CCP’s efforts to infiltrate several international organizations – to enhance the CCP’s international image, to seize international discourse, to steal international platforms, and to sell the CCP’s story.
Today, in the face of the joint report by the WHO and the CCP, the international community needs to reflect that staying at the level of “common concern” is not enough to ward off and defeat the CCP threat, and the lesson of the 2020 pandemic is that China and the world paid the price of millions of lives by indulging the CCP.
The name “WHO” does not in itself mean impartiality or science, nor does membership in WHO necessarily mean uncompromising commitment to public health and safety. The only way to find out the truth and escape from the crisis is to stick to one’s conscience.
Recent Comments