Capitol Hill Attack a Rumor U.S. Lawmakers Slam Congress for Military Abuse

National Guardsmen on duty outside the U.S. Capitol.

The March 4 militia attack on Capitol Hill that was hyped up by the left media after being fervently warned by the Capitol Police Department has been proven to be a rumor. And U.S. Rep. Michael Waltz (D-CA) blasted Congress for misusing the U.S. military, saying the move was a waste of taxpayer money.

According to the police, some civilian organizations predict that Trump will return to power for a second term on March 4. The House of Representatives canceled its Thursday and Friday sessions in response to warnings from Capitol Police to further increase security, but the Senate remained open for business as usual.

The Gateway Pundit reported that few people were present at the Capitol on March 4, and the area around the Capitol was almost completely deserted under high security, except for joggers, journalists and a few tourists who tried to take pictures of the Capitol dome through the fence.

The report said the Capitol Hill scene was quiet that day, with only a few peaceful people appearing nearby. A couple named Carson (Carson) said they came out around noon to see if anything was going on. And they said frankly that they think there is a problem with the 2020 presidential election in the United States, so the United States now has two presidents: Trump and Biden.

While it was quiet on Capitol Hill, at 3:08 p.m. that day, there was this scene on the streets of Washington, D.C., which had been on lockdown for more than a month. Multiple motorcycles were driving in front, followed by dozens of Secret Service vehicles with alarm bells calling, a very imposing sight. Some netizens marveled: What kind of big shot is this coming, as if it were going on a mission?

There are still thousands of National Guard soldiers protecting the Capitol, which is surrounded by fences and razor wire. This abnormal state of affairs has raised questions from lawmakers of both parties.

According to U.S. News OAN on March 4, plans for a stay that was originally planned to be reinforced by National Guard troops because of the Jan. 6 incident appear to have become permanent. Several members of Congress, including Rep. Walz, have asked Congress to respond to the situation. The lawmakers argued that Congress must reduce the presence of barbed wire and troops if there is no credible information and an imminent threat of violence. Walz said he has repeatedly asked Congress for intelligence briefings, but never received them.

Walz described how members of Congress now need more soldiers than the number of U.S. soldiers sent to Iraq and Afghanistan combined. He argued that soldiers need to return to their states to help distribute the Chinese Communist Virus (COVID-19) vaccine and reunite with their families.

While some Democratic lawmakers echoed Walz’s sentiments, congressional Democratic leaders insisted that National Guard troops be stationed in Congress for an extended period of Time while a review of Capitol security is conducted.

If the Pentagon does extend the 60-day period for the National Guard after March 12, the cost will fall on taxpayers, Walz said. In addition, the Defense Department originally estimated a cost of $300 million to keep National Guard soldiers until mid-March. And keeping the National Guard on duty longer could spike that budget into the billions of dollars.