Background of the incident: The suspicion of election theft cannot be dispelled
Biden officially entered the White House on January 20 and issued more than forty presidential orders within a few days, completing the process of de-Trumping; however, the suspicion of Biden’s Steal Vote (election theft) never disappeared in American society. Social media had to delete a large number of tweets and even tweet numbers accusing Biden of stealing the election. Biden supporters also described the fraud and election stealing as rumors created by Trump supporters.
However, Time Magazine published a Feb. 5 article, “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election,” about Mike Podhorzer, a pioneer of “data-driven political change” who created and led The story of Mike Podhorzer, the pioneer of “data-driven political change,” who created and led a cross-border coalition in 2019 to manipulate the nation’s elections like never before and “win” the 2020 U.S. elections.
After the articles were published, the leftist camp admired the organizers for their genius in using data to change politics, while conservatives saw the articles as a shameful return to the vault to show how the theft was carried out, such as when Byrne called Biden “President*” and said that Biden had won according to the process, but that it was an ignominious win. But it was a dishonorable win, like an athlete on dope, hence the asterisk. Former White House aide Garrett Ziegler said of this cognitive divide in a Feb. 6, 2021, video interview: “We live in a country where there are two conceptions of justice, and even if the evidence is put in front of the left, they won’t believe it. They’ll believe 2+2=5 if that’s what works operationally (Operational Success). Just as the X and Y chromosomes have been scientifically proven to be different for men and women, but the left still believes that men can become women” are objective arguments.
As a researcher who has followed the U.S. elections closely, I think this documentary in-depth report emerges to make up for an important perspective on the 2020 U.S. elections: the self-reporting of the Vote Stealers Coalition (they call themselves the Democratic Defense Coalition). In terms of documentation, the study of a history requires three categories: first-hand accounts and documentation, and third-party surveys.
Currently, there are six battleground states with live video recordings of consecutive hearings on election fraud held in the days following the election, which fall under the category of eyewitness accounts, and three consecutive investigative reports published within a month by economist and White House trade and industry adviser Peter Navarro: The Immaculate Deception: Six Key Dimensions of Election Fraud (The Immaculate Deception: Six Key Dimensions of Election Fraud). Immaculate Deception: Six Key Dimensions of Election Irregularities,” December 17, 2020, “The Art of the Steal,” January 12, 2021, “Yes, President Trump Wins (Yes, President Trump Won, January 13, 2021).
Inside the report, it says that a scientific analysis of election data and processes in six swing states (Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin) led to the powerful conclusion that 3,069,002 votes were suspected to have been cast illegally. Professor Navarro’s report is very strong, reliable, detailed, and belongs to the third-party investigation; only the documentation is lacking, and since Georgia and Michigan have destroyed the original documents, it is estimated that the leftist camp does not want to leave the documentation as evidence, and the Times article is self-evidence of the “winning” party. As long as the three types of information are read against each other, the election will come to a conclusion close to the truth whether the election is stolen.
As a witness to the U.S. 2020 election, I must be a sober witness to history and not be swayed by positions or annihilated by rumors.
Why did TIME publish this in-depth documentary?
After TIME published “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign,” I began to review the election based on the phenomena mentioned in “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign” article, comparing the relevant information since the election one by one (I never take Q’s rumors at face value). From all the big events that happened in 2020 as described in the article – from the connection between the Epidemic and the mail-in ballot, the rise of BLM and Antifa across the US after late May, the social media blocking of Trump and his supporters, the data evidence changes that happened after six states stopped counting votes on election night in November 2020, and the overall pressure on pro-Trump The pressure on key Trump supporters (the two Michigan Republican senators who went to the White House on November 20 to meet with Trump), through to the Alliance Defending Democracy’s efforts to include anti-Trump Republican politicians (called RINOs on Trump’s side), and the “Red” campaign mentioned in the article. I have written about this, including the mail-in ballots and the data coup, the last five steps after the election described in the article, and the “78 days” published by Jim Van Der Hey, founder of the leftist online media Axios, a few days before the election. The final five steps after the election described in the article were also described in the “78-day coup plan” published a few days before the election by Jim VanderHey, founder of the leftist online media Axios, but they were not as clearly listed.
All of this, Trump supporters believe, is being run by the deep state, but no one can say what kind of people make up that deep state and how they communicate and coordinate their actions. Even Democratic voters, as long as they are not in this huge action network, are probably not very clear. From this perspective, the article “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign” is a clear explanation of the organizers and organization network of the 2020 election manipulation and the way of action.
Then, Time magazine’s leftist position has always been pro-Democratic Party, and the reporter Molly Ball admits in the article that she has a close relationship with the organization and shares information in a timely manner, so if disclosing the inside story only hurts the leftist camp, she would never expose herself to the inside story of election rigging at this time. “What led Molly Ball to write this article and get the approval of the Alliance for Democracy?
I believe there are three reasons.
First, there were questions about Biden’s election theft. About half a month after the election, a Rasmussen poll was released on November 20, 2020, in which about 47 percent of people thought Biden stole the election, including 30 percent of Democrats surveyed and 75 percent of Republicans, and 47 percent of all respondents thought Biden stole the election. The vote-stealers know in their hearts that although they got Biden into the White House as they had hoped, the stigma of stealing the election cannot be erased.
Second, since the theft of the election is a fact, simply take the initiative to come out and do the opposite, saying that it is “to defend democracy”, to put on the aura of moral political correctness for the theft of the election. The author puts the left on the moral high ground at every turn, describing the theft of the election, which undermines American democracy and constitutionalism, as an action to defend democracy. The Democratic Party is the core of the leftist system of organizations wrapped in the veneer of non-partisanship to prove that it has gained more help, and so on, not only to justify their own name, but also to convince the left of those who suspect fraudulent voters, as a spiritual placebo to them.
Third, the success of stealing the election, must let the world know its merits. The article mentions that “Ian Bassin, co-founder of the nonpartisan rule of law advocacy group ‘Protect Democracy’ (a coalition affiliated with the Alliance for the Defense of Democracies), said: ‘Any attempt to interfere with the correct outcome of the election would be a mistake. Any attempt to interfere with the correct outcome of the election has been thwarted. But it’s very important for this country to understand that this didn’t happen by accident. The system doesn’t work magically. Democracy doesn’t perform automatically.”
By electoral correctness, I mean that the left sees nothing as correct except for electing the people they want, and that all actions taken to achieve this, even if they go against existing laws, are “defending democracy”; by “democracy is not self-executing” The Democratic Party should not forget that they “won” this election by using their wisdom and various means, not by the voters’ own choice.
Based on the above considerations, the article “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign to Save the 2020 Election” was written. Although the article is full of praise for the Coalition to Steal the Elections, claiming that everything it does is in the “defense of democracy”. However, given the shocking facts revealed in the article, which almost completely negate the leftist media’s (including Time) previously one-sided argument that “election fraud does not exist,” even the leftist media, which praised the success of the “grand scheme,” had to admit: “The Even the leftist media, which hailed the “grand scheme” as a success, had to admit: “The Times investigation has thoroughly shaken up American society, especially the most conservative sectors, by unraveling how a months-long scheme was hatched to defeat Trump in the polls, in the courts and in public opinion.”
The article then finally admits that it was “a mega-conspiracy organized among progressives, liberals and even some conservatives.
Because of the status of the United States, and because the 2020 U.S. election will surely be a key turning point in the world’s transition from globalization to the Great Reset, this “Secret History of the Shadow Campaign” has left a precious text for the United States and for the world because of its self-incriminating theft of the election. From now on, the leftist media can no longer claim that the election is fair and transparent, but can only praise themselves for the “very clever” stolen election.
Recent Comments