U.S. Capitol Police.
After the Capitol Hill incident on Jan. 6, people were told that five people died during the protests that day, and more than a month later, Trump, who was charged for the incident, had his impeachment trial begin in the Senate. Thus implicating people’s desire to find the truth. Revolver News, a U.S. media outlet, on Feb. 9 provided an exhaustive and fascinating analysis of the truth about the death of Officer Brian Sicknick, one of the five dead men.
Last week, CNN was stumped by a simple question that grew stranger by the day, Revolver News said. Why did investigators go to the trouble of framing the death of U.S. Capitol Police Officer Snicknick as a murder?
Officer Snicker’s death is the only death allegedly caused by a crowd that was let into Capitol Hill by police, at least in part out of confusion, for social media reach, or simply in memoriam, and even the New York Times has acknowledged that limited property damage was caused.
But that’s a far cry from murder. Yet MAGA has been bloodily defamed in the court of public opinion and in Trump’s (Trump’s) impeachment case as a felony murderer, while potential “exculpatory” evidence has been silenced or sealed. As the Democratic Party in Washington mulls domestic anti-terrorism legislation in response to the MAGA bloodbath, there is a growing belief that MAGA may have been bloodied. Time is of the essence for the FBI to release all evidence, to bring guilty to justice, or to clear the MAGA movement of these serious allegations.
So, why did the FBI withhold Officer Snicker’s medical report?
Opinion Version 1.0: Shameless Lies
Revolver News blasted the huge New York Times headline the day after Snicker was reported dead, which later turned out to be a Judith Miller-level dirty lie.
Version 1.0 flooded the airwaves, editorials and social media. Every outlet from USAToday to the New York Post to the Daily Dot repeated that Snick was “hit by a fire extinguisher,” that it wasn’t “sources say,” that it wasn’t It’s not “many people believe” – it’s just a completely unqualified, unequivocal statement of fact.
In an unforgivable shock, the House trial memo itself, which lists the alleged impeachment charges against the 45th president, states that Trump is “responsible for hitting a Capitol Police officer in the head with a fire extinguisher, killing his insurgents. Their source was the New York Times.
But the New York Times left a real “stink” in this, because every claim they made, every detail they conveyed, was a lie.
Law enforcement officials now tell CNN that when Snick died, there were no fire extinguisher blows, no bloody wounds, and no blunt force trauma.
Not only that, but it’s increasingly unclear even when and where Snik died and whether he was taken to a hospital.
It turns out that many hours after the protest had ended, Snicker texted his brother Ken that night (Jan. 6), confirming that he was basically fine and “in good shape” except for being “pepper-sprayed twice.
Then, a strange thing happened. The next afternoon (Jan. 7), the Snickers Family began receiving phone calls saying that Officer Snickers had been pronounced dead. These calls were not from the hospital, or from the attending physician, or from the U.S. Capitol Police, the FBI or the Department of Justice. They were coming from media reporters!
Certain privileged members of the media were apparently the first to receive the sensitive information circulating among “law enforcement officials” that Snicker was dead.
But then the story became even more bizarre, as if echoing scenes from the dark, twisted British surreal humor group Monty Python’s “Bring Out Your Dead,” which turns out Snicker is not dead.
The U.S. Capitol Police responded in a public statement on the evening of January 7, saying that the media gossip was untrue. Snicker was still alive.
An hour later, when Snickers’ family arrived at the hospital and saw their beloved Brian still fighting for his Life, the U.S. Capitol Police issued another statement: Now Snickers is dead.
In an article on the truth of Officer Snik’s death, the investigative news organization ProPublica wrote: “‘We didn’t get any calls,’ Ken Sicknic said. Sicknic) said, ‘We’re a little overwhelmed right now. You (the media) got the notice of his death before I even got any information.’ Officer Sicknic was the youngest of three brothers.”
“Nearly an hour later, the U.S. Capitol Police Department issued a statement refuting news reports of an officer’s death. The department eventually reported that Snicker had died at 9:30 p.m. Thursday (Jan. 7), adding that it was the result of injuries sustained in the previous day’s attack.”
But even this statement contains a curious detail. Ken Snicker was told that his brother collapsed inside the Capitol before being taken to the hospital. But the statement from the U.S. Capitol Police that night tells a different story: He returned to the police department’s office first.
Sometime between Wednesday night (Jan. 6), when Snicker was fine, healthy and back in his office, and early Thursday evening (Jan. 7), when he was dead or near death, Snicker apparently had a stroke. The part about when and how the stroke occurred should be the easiest part of this story to resolve. However, we are told to believe this, or as the media likes to say, “there is no proof.”
Then the story gets even stranger.
Acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen said the Justice Department would “leave no stone unturned” to find out why Snicker died. Yet more than a month after his death, the Justice Department, the FBI, the U.S. Capitol Police, the D.C. medical examiner, the hospital that cared for him and his treating physician have disclosed precisely no information.
Exactly one month after Snicker’s death, no autopsy results have been released. For reference, an autopsy takes only two to four hours, and preliminary results are usually available within 24 hours.
Investigators were “troubled by the lack of evidence that anyone could have caused his death. Authorities “have reviewed video and photographs showing that Snicker had contact with the mob during the siege, but have not yet determined the moment he was fatally wounded.”
Ominously, the findings of the D.C. medical examiner have not been released. Authorities have not released the ongoing process.
The U.S. Capitol is one of the most video-supervised buildings on the planet. Instead, federal authorities have not released any internal video footage and have not promised to make it available.
No one knew that Snick’s memorial remains had been cremated, except for the chance discovery that Snick’s remains had been placed in an urn, not a casket. This meant that no further forensic analysis could be performed to determine the cause and time of Snick’s death. One wonders why a family, still searching for answers, would authorize cremation without autopsy results, a death certificate, or a medical report. Did this family authorize (the cremation)?
Opinion Version 2.0: Strategic Ambiguity and Rhetorical Confusion
As “Opinion Version 1.0” turns into a total mainstream media hoax, the globalist American left media is transitioning to “Opinion Version 2.0”: strategic ambiguity and rhetorical obfuscation.
Snicker was not killed by MAGA thugs. Snicker died from injuries sustained during physical contact with protesters, according to Capitol Police.
They have quietly removed “by” and added “while” and “with”. Then they have reconstructed the entire sentence in the passive voice so that 90% of readers will confuse what happened and accept their statement.
But “injured in physical contact” is like “died of pneumonia in Wuhan”. Even if you die in a car accident, they will interpret it that way. It’s a trick.
But using this framing device preserves the memetic energy of opinion version 1.0 (brazen lies) without the need to painstakingly provide readers with a more accurate narrative of what investigators really believe happened that day: “Officers killed five people.”
But how exactly did they die?Revolver News promises to explore this disturbing question in part two of its explosive investigative series. Stay tuned.
Recent Comments