One third of China’s barrels of water is “fake water” boss smoking while filling water
Beijing Youth Daily 7 quoted industry insiders as saying that nearly one-third of the barrel-filled water in circulation is “fake water”.
The newspaper pointed out that there are two main types of counterfeit barrel water in China: one is directly filled with tap water or underground water for sale without strict filtration and disinfection; the other is that some small factories buy production licenses, labels and real barrels of some big brands, and then directly fill their own produced water into the real big brand packaging for sale. These “fake water” profits can be as high as 10 yuan a barrel on average.
Beijian Daily visited a “black water factory” in Zhengzhou where counterfeit barrels of water were manufactured, pointing out that the “black water factory” was crude and full of filthy barrel cleaning equipment, tanks, and buckets. The owner of the counterfeit water factory was holding a cigarette in one hand and a water pipe in the other hand to fill a barrel called “OA Spring”.
The report pointed out that the quality of counterfeit buckets of water is also a major hidden problem. At present, there are two main materials of barrels of pure water on the market in China: one is made of PC and the other is made of PET, but the prices vary greatly. Unqualified buckets mainly use PET material, at high temperatures are prone to carcinogenic substances. Some industry insiders said that the general Life of the bucket is two or three years, but some buckets on the market have been used for nearly six years.
In addition, from the bucket, bucket sealing cover to the heat shrinkable film set, bucket of water counterfeiting in China has formed a mature industry chain.
Henan woman 722 yuan to deposit 12 years actually left 20 cents bank: and then late to also have to pay back
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China.
It is said that the money in the bank is the safest, but in mainland China, bank deposits around the “missing”, “lost money” case after case.
The mainland media reported on Feb. 8 that a woman surnamed Li deposited 722 yuan in the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China 12 years ago, and then forgot her bankbook and never went to withdraw it. When she remembered to withdraw it this year, she found only 20 cents left in her account.
Ms. Li said that after she consulted the staff, the bank said that it was deducted from various administrative fees. And that Ms. Li’s bank card is a savings card, the balance is zero for a long Time, and more than 3 years without transaction behavior, will automatically cancel the account.
Ms. Li disclosed that the bank also said, “there is this fee that fee are deducted, and then a few years later will have to pay back!”
The incident has caused a lot of debate among netizens. Many people questioned how the bank could withhold deposits from depositors by virtue of the name of management fees.
After the incident triggered public criticism, ICBC came out to argue that the reason for Ms. Li’s missing money was the withholding of pension insurance premiums, and stressed that the bank did not deduct any fees in the name of management account.
In fact, similar deposit “missing”, “lost money” cases in Zhejiang, Henan, Anhui, Hunan and other places repeatedly occur. What is even more unacceptable to depositors is that their deposits are gone from the bank and cannot be recovered.
Jiang Zemin started the era of moral decline in China when “muffled” money was made
The moral decline of a country and nation is usually a top-down, far-reaching process of transmission. As the proverb says, the upper beam is not right and the lower beam is crooked. Since the officials do not take moral integrity seriously, the people under their rule can not follow suit? Thus, we see that officials love money, the people worship Gold; officials corrupt, businessmen will speculate; officials lie, the people will follow to tell lies; officials are selfish and indifferent, the people will only care about themselves ……
How did the world-famous wind of corruption in the Chinese officialdom blow up? In addition to the fundamental factors of the totalitarian communist system, Jiang Zemin is the initiator and the black flag bearer. During Jiang Zemin’s 13-year tenure as General Secretary of the CCP and his two-year tenure as Chairman of the Military Commission through a coup d’état, the CCP officialdom became unprecedentedly rotten, sucking money from top to bottom, and the bigger the official, the more daring he was.
On October 27, 2000, Hong Kong journalist Zhang Baohua asked Jiang Zemin in Zhongnanhai about whether Tung Chee-hwa had been “handpicked” for the 2002 Hong Kong Chief Executive election. Jiang Zemin angrily ridiculed the Hong Kong journalists for their simplicity and naivety, and lost no time in “teaching” them: “There is a Chinese saying, ‘Stifle your voice and make a fortune,’ so I don’t have to say anything, it’s the best… …
According to data cited by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, since 1990, the direct economic losses caused by the corruption of Chinese Communist Party officials have ranged from $987.5 billion to $1 trillion and $257 billion annually. Jiang Zemin has been the first to bear the brunt of these losses.
During Jiang Zemin’s 13-year tenure as general secretary of the Communist Party and his two-year tenure as chairman of the military commission through a coup d’état, the Communist Party’s officialdom became unprecedentedly rotten, and money was absorbed from top to bottom.
Zhang Zhan court photos exposed: handcuffed, wheelchair, thin bones like wood
A few days ago, Zhang Zhan’s trial photos were exposed.
After Zhang Zhan, a Chinese journalist who went to Wuhan to photograph the city’s closure, was sentenced to four years in prison for “provoking and provoking trouble,” Wang Jianhong, a longtime human rights activist, released a recent photo of Zhang Zhan on June 6.
Zhang Zhan’s lawyer Zhang Keke confirmed to Apple Daily that the photo was indeed taken during the trial, saying that Zhang Zhan is still in custody at the Shanghai Pudong New Area Detention Center, and that he last saw Zhang Zhan on January 13 due to the current Epidemic. The F35 has a record of 40:1.
The F35 had a 40:0 record, the mainland netizens sigh: how about the J-20?
The picture is the U.S. Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning 2 stealth fighter
The Chinese Ministry of National Defense confirmed that the Chinese Communist Party’s own stealth fighter J20 is gradually being integrated into the actual troops. In response, some have compared the U.S. military’s F-35 stealth fighter. The aircraft had recorded an overwhelming 40:0 victory in a military exercise in 2017, causing many Chinese netizens to lament, “What about the J-20?”
According to the mainland media, the J-20 fighter jet made its maiden flight on Jan. 11, 2011, and so far China has produced at least 40 J-20s. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) boasts that the J-20 can compete with the U.S.-made F-22 or F-35.
But a mainland military media “East China Sea Great Plains” wrote an article analyzing that the F-35 would first ensure that it would not be shot down by the enemy in anti-aircraft interception operations, and then set a sick record of 40:0 in surprise attack operations, which seems to prove that the F-35 is “the real strongest. This seems to prove that the F-35 is a “real powerhouse”.
The article said that such achievements, undoubtedly hit the F-35 in the global reputation, the F-35 is powerful because it is a soft information degree of the fighter, not only has a powerful engine, some relatively good performance of the basic equipment, it also has a high technology component, to do the combination of automation and intelligence.
In military exercises, these advantages presented in the F-35 best at pre-emptive strikes, but also to better grasp the normal state of the battle. It is not only very good at prediction, but also very scary in real combat, and most of all, it greatly reduces the burden of the pilot.
The F-35 uses the PAVE PACE integrated avionics system, which integrates a variety of advanced electronics through a high-performance onboard computer, and then hands over the tasks that require immediate processing and are exceptionally heavy to the background, finally presenting the decision-making information to the pilot.
A J-20 fighter jet is pictured during a drill at the Zhuhai Air Show on Nov. 1, 2016.
The J-20 is a stowaway fighter designed and developed by Sichuan Chengdu Aircraft Company, and the fourth stowaway fighter in addition to the U.S. F-22, F-35, and Russian Su-57. It has been in development since 2002, entered service in 2017 and just recently completed its first maritime training exercise.
Justin Bronk, an air combat expert at the Royal United Services Institute, a British think tank, told Business Insider that even though the J-20 is the best Chinese fighter, it is no match for the decades-old U.S. F-15. Even though the J-20 is the best Chinese fighter, it is not as good as the F-15s that have been in service for decades.
According to Bronk, it will be years before the CCP crosses the threshold of extending the fighter’s flight range and improving its performance. Because of this, the J-20 is no match for the F-15 or Typhoon, let alone the F-22.
Clubhouse privacy policy has a privacy crisis
Radio Free Asia has checked the privacy policy of Clubhouse, which indicates that user information can be shared with relevant authorities due to national security issues. The core technology of the Clubhouse software is said to be derived from Agora, a US-listed Chinese technology company, which stated in its US listing that it was subject to speech censorship under Chinese communist law. The two companies involved did not respond to press inquiries.
The privacy policy of Alpha Exploration Co. states that the company will share user information in the event of national security or law enforcement requests.
The privacy policy specifically states that international users should be aware that if applicable, user data will be transferred to the company’s technology partners. The media reported that the core voice technology of Clubhouse is provided by Agora, a Chinese-owned company. In addition, if a user complains, the company will store the chat room recording for a short period of time until the company has completed its investigation.
Agora, which went public on NASDAQ in 2020, specializes in real-time voice transmission technology and was founded by Chinese national Bin Zhao in 2014 with dual headquarters in Shanghai and California.
According to Agora’s 2020 U.S. securities registration statement, under “Business Risks in China,” a significant percentage of Agora’s operations remain in China and are regulated by Chinese law, which requires users to delete, record and report to the government if they are found to be leaking confidential state content. The company also acknowledges that compliance with relevant laws may affect demand for its products.
The “Information Security and Censorship” section of the statement also states that the Chinese government strictly controls the Internet, and that under the China Network Security Law, Internet providers are required to strengthen the management of information posted by users, and that network operators are required to immediately delete, store and report to the relevant authorities any “illegal” content they find.
(Duration of this segment: 1:55; Total: 9:56)
Hope is always there: Clubhouse was banned by the Chinese Communist Party less than a week after it caught fire
The U.S. social voice software Clubhouse (Elite Club) was banned by the Chinese Communist Party on Feb. 8, less than a week after it became popular. Netizens have expressed no surprise about this. Wang Dan, a leader of the June Fourth Movement, tweeted, “As long as the CCP exists, there will be no illusions about a free Internet.”
Because of the “invitation code” required to sign up for a Clubhouse account, the price for the code was as high as 400 yuan on China’s most popular online shopping platforms, but now all invitation codes sold on Taobao and other online shopping platforms have been taken offline.
Now that the software has been on fire for less than a week and was quickly banned by the CCP, netizens have said that they are not surprised.
Wang Dan, a leader of the June Fourth Movement, tweeted, “But at the same time, it is important to see that with a little space and opportunity, China’s younger generation is eager to learn the truth and to discuss issues rationally, including the issue of unification and independence. This shows: hope is always there.”
Recent Comments