On January 28, Hu Xijin, the editor-in-chief of the Global Times, who has always presented himself as a guest of the system, sent out a long Weibo post and habitually began to point out the overall impact of the Epidemic on economic activities and the loss of social wealth, not forgetting, of course, that China’s GDP was still growing positively last year, which is in fact nothing to be ashamed of.
But while praising China, Hu’s editor-in-chief habitually hacked other countries, saying, “Some countries give money to everyone, but that’s coaxing everyone, and giving money to everyone is basically the same as not giving money at all.
This extraordinarily harsh words, immediately annoyed the crowd of onlookers.
Instantly, the comment section of Hu’s editor-in-chief became a large car accident scene.
One of the most liked messages was “Why are you sending money basically equal to not sending money.” This seemingly restrained comment is followed by a pleasant smiley face, but people with a slightly more normal IQ know how strong the anger is suppressed behind this expression, which is simply a rhetorical question.
The later statements, not so polite, such as “civil servants are certainly nothing to lose …… welfare benefits have not decreased at all, quite good”, “as the media, should happen for the people (voice), rather than mention (for) The government justifies”, “‘are issued money equal to not issued money’, good guys, this plate gripping.” The government’s taxation is basically the same as not collecting taxes? , “coordinates Jiangsu green vegetables have been 7 yuan a catty” ……
There are many particularly fierce criticism behind, I will not list them all, you can see for yourself, public opinion how its anger.
The epidemic in the end how raging, we can all feel, the general public have a few people have not been affected by the ripples, this pain we all feel.
As for some people, Life can already be described as a struggle.
For the people at the bottom of life is very difficult, they need the help of real money, can give money is the father, and the most should play the role of this father, is the government.
Of course, for the most difficult part of the group, the government did take relief measures, which is inexcusable, but we should also admit one thing, the rainy dew type of money relief, indeed, does not exist.
The epidemic in the past year, the world’s economic past countries, the basic have given money to the nationals, near Japan and South Korea, as far as Europe and the United States, the Americans have sent three waves of money, I did not see the United States of those knowledgeable people to stand up and say, do not send, are sent as not sent.
What kind of logic is this? Economic logic? Political logic?
In my opinion, it is the logic of assholes.
Someone really jumped on the concept that an increase in the minimum wage would lead to an increase in Inflation. Dare I say that the bad social conditions are the result of you poor people being too well fed and too good to be understood that way?
Isn’t it the same thing to raise wages, and to give out money for the poor?
Use your simple morality and intellect to judge, as some comments said, I will have money to buy rice, noodles, meat and eggs, no money I can only starve like a fool, such a point of elementary school students understand the reasoning, need to pull to all the money is the same as no money on such a strange fallacy?
Maybe the situation of each country is different, other countries government is too much free money, they are willing to send we can not stop, they are willing to coax everyone as Hu said, fooling everyone to play, we also have no right to speak.
We do not send money, may also have its reasons, but please Hu editor-in-chief such a cultural people with the right to speak, can not lick the face to say, sent money is the same as no money such shameless remarks?
If you perform like this again, it is estimated that the stingy patriotic man who lives in the basement and eats instant noodles will have to jump to his feet and curse.
You know, can be active in the comment section of Hu editor-in-chief, in addition to a small number of black powder, most of his iron powder, such as the fake package of the basic plate, now the basic plate can be backwater scolding him, see how anti-intellectual his remarks, how unpopular.
The first thing you can do is to talk about the interests of the masses, the editor-in-chief Hu, is really speaking from the perspective of the masses every Time?
Of course, I criticize Hu’s editor-in-chief, some people may still be uncomfortable, saying that you are not just expressing an opposing attitude, you can say something deeper common sense to convince me?
Well, I will talk about the benefits of giving out money today.
The most superficial benefits of giving out money, there is no need to say more, the people who have money to spend, the society must be stable, domestic demand is being pulled, then say something deeper.
After Biden took office as president, he planned to take out $1 trillion in rainy day money to Americans, each American can receive $1400.
Before that, the U.S. had already given out money twice, the first time $290 billion and the second time $900 billion.
The U.S. unemployment rate is at an all-time high, and the U.S. per capita income has surprisingly risen by 25%, so who can tell me what’s happening?
The Americans who got real money, opened the buy mode, the largest costco supermarkets in the United States, ushered in a wave of sales boom, some people liken this to revenge consumption.
Last summer, the United States of America’s Wal-Mart supermarket online sales surged 97%, as for sales on Amazon, there is more than one, joint sales records.
Amazon platform for new sellers, 75% from China, made in China in this wave of the epidemic, only in the early encountered some difficulties, the later ushered in a spurt of orders frenzy.
Large to cranes, small appliances and textiles, or hand towels such as fast-consuming daily necessities, China’s share is increasing. And the United States of America’s big money action, is directly stimulating and universal benefit to the Chinese manufacturing.
The foreign trade manufacturers I know, especially to the U.S. market, are now working three shifts in their factories, working feverishly. They don’t care about capitalists, or the word exploitation in the books, as long as they get paid for the work they do.
Since last summer, China’s foreign exports have been growing positively for seven consecutive months, with export growth of 9.9% in September, which has doubled to 18.1% in December.
Without the big spill of money from the United States, the bottom of the American people rely on what to support the Made in China, I’m afraid they can only receive hamburgers at the Soup kitchen.
The American people are giving out money and even the Chinese people can benefit from it, so do you think giving out money is a good thing or a bad thing?
If someone thinks the big money spreading is a bad thing, that person is either a big dumbass or a big badass.
The probability of the latter is obviously greater, because it is something that does not require intelligence to figure out.
Those who do not treat the people as human beings, those who try to play the people like monkeys, those who deliberately pretend not to hear the people’s cries, will not end well.
Recent Comments