Data scientists recently testified at a hearing before the Georgia Senate that election data showed the state switched 17,650 votes cast for President Donald Trump (D) to Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden (D).
On Wednesday (Dec. 30), a team of experts led by Lynda McLaughlin, along with data scientists Justin Mealey and Dave Lobue, presented their findings on the election to the Georgia Senate Judiciary Subcommittee.
Milley served as an electronic warfare technician in the U.S. Navy for 9 1/2 years and also worked under contract with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) as a data analyst and programmer for the National Counterterrorism Center. Currently, he works as a programmer for one of the Big Four accounting firms.
Loboué is a data scientist with more than a decade of experience in multiple industries.
“We can prove that there was actually fraud in this election, that fraud occurred in the Joe State election, and we can prove it with data.” Milley said, “The will of the people of Joe State to vote is not reflected in the results certified by the Secretary of State.”
According to the team’s analysis of time-series election data posted online Dec. 24, Trump’s vote in counties showed a decline rather than the normal incremental increase.
As many as 17,650 Trump votes were allegedly shifted to Biden.
Time series data analysis shows that Trump’s votes appeared to be declining in several counties in the Joe State, which normally would have been incremental. (NTD LIVE Screenshot)
The team said the vote shift occurred at the county level, so it was difficult to observe at the state level because the decrease was offset by accurate data uploaded from other counties.
One “clear example of vote switching” occurred in DeKalb County, the data scientists said.
At 9:11 p.m. local time on Nov. 3, Trump received 29,391 votes, while Biden received 17,218. But in the next report update, Trump’s vote count changed to 17,218, while Biden’s vote count changed to 29,391.
For this single event alone, 12,173 votes were converted.
Lobue said, “I want to make it very, very clear that at no point in the incremental process should you have a decrease.”
Trump lost the state by a margin of 12,670 votes, according to the current certified results in Joe, and the Trump campaign is still challenging the results in multiple courts.
McLaughlin’s team did not name any state officials, county officials or relevant voting machine manufacturers for wrongdoing. They emphasized that the analysis is non-partisan.
“The analysis we’re reviewing is purely scientific, not based on any political affiliation, not red or blue, left or right. The goal is truly to focus on numbers, data and machine network systems.”
The Epoch Times was unable to independently verify the allegation.
The Joe State Office did not respond to The Epoch Times’ request for comment. Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and his office have vehemently denied that systematic election fraud occurred during the general election.
Ballot counting process flawed
Experts also said at Wednesday’s hearing that they believe ballot switching may have occurred during the Results Counting and Reporting (RTR) process.
The Epoch Times was also unable to independently verify the allegation.
According to information posted on Dominion’s website, Joe State used the Dominion voting system in the November election.
Poll workers can reject or validate ballots during the RTR process. A widely circulated video (click here) shows a Coffey County (Tenn.) elections supervisor demonstrating how the Dominion voting software can change ballots through a “ruling” process. The process also allows the operator to scribble a ballot mark on a scanned ballot, or to invalidate a voter’s completed ballot mark.
Richard Barron, director of the Fulton County Board of Elections and Registration, the most populous county in the state of Joe, has issued a statement saying the county has conducted numerous ballot adjudications.
“As of just now, we scanned 113,130 (ballots) and adjudicated more than 106,000 (93.7 percent) of them.” He said in a video, “The only ballots that were adjudicated were those, (that is) the ones where we had a challenge to a ballot, where there was a problem in terms of what the computer read and how it was read. And then the ballot review team goes out and determines the intent of the voter.”
After the ballots are adjudicated and the data is released and sent to the Secretary of State and the media data port, there is an “audit” step in the RTR process that is supposed to readjust the results after the “unofficial results” are released.
The manual does not mention whether this step requires authorization from the Secretary of State, nor is it clear whether votes can be changed, deleted or added during the audit process.
According to the Dominion Statistics and Reporting User Guide, available on the Colorado Secretary of State’s office website, such “unofficial results,” the data used by McLaughlin’s team in the analysis, should be made available to the public after the ruling.
It’s unlikely that this will make Trump’s vote any less likely.
Recent Comments